Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Appian VS localhost.run

Compare Appian VS localhost.run and see what are their differences

Anyone.com
The smarter way to buy, sell, and close real estate transactions. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Appian logo Appian

See how Appian, leading provider of modern low-code and BPM software solutions, has helped transform the businesses of over 3.5 million users worldwide.

localhost.run logo localhost.run

Instantly share your localhost environment!
  • Appian Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-20
  • localhost.run Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24

Appian features and specs

  • Low-Code Development
    Appian allows users to create applications with minimal hand-coding, catering to business analysts and developers alike. Its drag-and-drop interface simplifies development and accelerates time-to-market.
  • Process Automation
    Appian excels in automating complex business processes, improving operational efficiency, and reducing human error. Its powerful BPM tools streamline workflows effectively.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Appian provides strong integration capabilities with various third-party systems, databases, and cloud services. This ensures that applications can seamlessly communicate with existing enterprise systems.
  • Enterprise-Grade Security
    Appian offers robust security features, including role-based access control and data encryption, making it suitable for businesses with stringent security requirements.
  • Scalability
    As a cloud-native platform, Appian is highly scalable, supporting the needs of growing enterprises by easily handling increased loads and more complex applications.
  • User Experience
    The platform provides a user-friendly interface, both for developers building the applications and end-users interacting with them, enhancing overall user satisfaction.

Possible disadvantages of Appian

  • Cost
    Appian can be expensive, particularly for small to medium-sized businesses. Its pricing model might not be feasible for organizations operating on a limited budget.
  • Learning Curve
    Although it simplifies development, mastering Appian still requires a learning curve. Users need to invest time in training, which can slow down the initial development phase.
  • Complex Customization
    Highly tailored or very specific customizations can be challenging to implement within Appian. Some complicated functionalities may require extensive workarounds.
  • Limited Offline Functionality
    Appian's offline capabilities are limited, which can be a disadvantage for field services or users who need to access the application without a reliable internet connection.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Due to its proprietary technology, organizations may face vendor lock-in, making it challenging to migrate applications or data to another platform if needed.
  • Performance Issues at Scale
    While Appian is scalable, some users report performance issues when running extremely large and complex applications, which can impact user experience and overall efficiency.

localhost.run features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Localhost.run provides a simple way to expose your local server to the internet without requiring complex configurations or additional software installations.
  • No Installation Required
    You can use localhost.run directly from your terminal without the need to install any software or dependencies.
  • Free and Instantaneous
    Localhost.run offers a free service, and you can quickly start tunneling without any wait times or sign-ups.
  • Wide Compatibility
    It works with any web server running on your local machine, making it highly versatile.

Possible disadvantages of localhost.run

  • Stability and Uptime
    As a free service, localhost.run may not be as reliable as paid alternatives, potentially leading to unexpected downtimes.
  • Limited Customization
    Localhost.run doesn't offer many advanced features or customizations, which may be a drawback for more complex use cases.
  • Security
    By exposing your local server to the internet, there could be potential security risks if your server is not properly configured or secured.
  • Performance
    The performance of the tunnel can be slower compared to running the server locally due to additional network hops and bandwidth limitations.

Analysis of localhost.run

Overall verdict

  • Localhost.run is a good tool for developers who need a fast, efficient, and secure way to share their local development environments. Its ease of use and minimal setup make it an excellent choice for quick sharing and testing scenarios.

Why this product is good

  • Localhost.run is a service that provides a quick and easy way to expose a local server to the internet. It is often praised for its simplicity, ease of use, and minimal setup requirements. It allows developers to share their work quickly for collaboration, testing, or demonstration purposes without needing to deploy to a public server. It uses a secure SSH tunnel, which adds a layer of security to the service.

Recommended for

  • Developers who need to demo their work to clients or teams
  • Collaborative programming and real-time feedback
  • Testing webhooks or APIs from an external source
  • Temporary exposure of local servers for testing purposes

Appian videos

+ Add

Appian CEO: Delivering โ€˜Mission-Criticalโ€™ Software | Mad Money | CNBC

More videos:

  • Review - This is Appian
  • Review - Appian Application Designer: Build Applications in Days, not Years

localhost.run videos

No localhost.run videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Appian and localhost.run)

Appian

localhost.run

BPM
100 100%
BPM
0% 0
Localhost Tools
0 0%
Localhost Tools
100% 100
Workflow Automation
100 100%
Workflow Automation
0% 0
Webhooks
0 0%
Webhooks
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Appian and localhost.run. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Appian and localhost.run

Appian Reviews

Top 10 Microsoft Power Apps Alternatives and Competitors 2024
Strengths: A powerful low-code platform, Appian caters to large enterprises with complex business process automation needs. It offers robust workflow management capabilities, allowing you to automate intricate business processes with decision-making logic and case management features. Appian excels in industries like finance, insurance, and healthcare, where complex...
Source: medium.com
7 Best Business Process Management Tools (2023)
Appian is used by companies to automate their routine tasks, integrate with other enterprise tools, and create custom workflows. It offers a wide range of features such as mobile app development, chatbots, AI assistants, etc.
Source: theecmconsultant.com
11 Business Process Management (BPM) Software for SMBs
Experience the power of business workflow automation with Appian and accelerate your business governance, results, and efficiency. Appian simplifies your workflow design to empower users and pro developers to draw processes, such as a flowchart.
Source: geekflare.com
10 Best Low-Code Development Platforms in 2020
Verdict: Appian is the provider of the software development platform. The Appian low code development platform is a combination of intelligent automation and low-code development.
Source: www.softwaretestinghelp.com
Best Google App Maker alternatives in 2020
Appian excels when used to create form-based apps. The product does allow building custom UI components, but only by using Appianโ€™s in-product customization tools. Appianโ€™s reasoning for this is security and to ensure JS compliance across browsers and devices.
Source: retool.com

localhost.run Reviews

Tunnelling services for exposing localhost to the web
localhost.run is very similar to Serveo but with less features. In fact, as far as I can tell, it only does 1 thing: expose your local web server to the web with a public URL. And it does that well enough for me.
Source: chenhuijing.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, localhost.run should be more popular than Appian. It has been mentiond 42 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Appian mentions (7)

  • AI Coding Adoption at Enterprise Scale Is Harder Than Anyone Admits
    AI coding adoption at enterprise scale is hard because the real project is not installing a tool. It is redesigning trust, review, ownership, and delivery discipline around a new source of code generation. That's where platforms like Retool, ToolJet, Appian, etc. shine. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Enterprise App Builders That Are Actually Enterprise-Ready (Top 5)
    You are process-heavy and regulated, and your app is basically a workflow engine: Appian. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Low-Code tools & Frontend
    Does any of you use a low-code tool like Retool or Appian? If so, what is the most common use case? Source: over 3 years ago
  • Appian Associate Developer Certification help
    Look for use case inspiration in the Solutions area of appian.com and within the AppMarket. See if you can build proof of concepts of some of these. Source: over 3 years ago
  • What is best way to create an online responsive database driven website to help manage my small orchard?
    There are low code database driven website creation systems out there at the moment e.g. OutSystems and Appian however they have very limited free trials (e.g. auto-disable after a few days of no use), and then the paid options are again too expensive. Although I will note that they seem to be great in terms of their usability and would be perfect for creating a simple interface without too much diving into code. Source: about 4 years ago
View more

localhost.run mentions (42)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Appian and localhost.run, you can also consider the following products

Camunda - The Universal Process Orchestrator

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

Kintone - Build business apps and supercharge your company's productivity with kintone's all-in-one...

sish - An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.

Bizagi - Bizagi is a Business Process Management (BPMS) solution for faster and flexible process automation. It's powerful yet intuitive BPM Suite is designed to make your business more agile.

LocalXpose - Your network without the IT work. Radically simple, always-on tunneling service for mission-critical applications.

Loading...