Apollo.io
ZoomInfo
Lusha
Hunter.io
Instantly.ai
Clearbit
Snov.io
lemlist
Markdrop
BugHerd
Pastel
Webvizio
Apollo.io MarkdropNo Markdrop videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Markdrop's answer:
Markdrop combines powerful visual feedback, screen recording, and developer-ready bug reporting into a single, lightweight tool that feels invisible until you need it. Unlike bloated alternatives, Markdrop is fast, easy to integrate, and built for modern teams who care about speed and clarity with no Chrome extension or signup friction required.
Markdrop's answer:
Affordable, transparent pricing: Markdrop offers all the core features at a fraction of the cost of tools like Markup.io or Pastel.
Designed for devs and designers: Every comment can include logs, screen recordings, and environment data ready for developers to act on.
No friction for users: Share a link and anyone can leave feedback. No browser extensions, no accounts, no hassle.
Fast and privacy-respecting: Lightweight script, GDPR-compliant, and zero tracking bloat.
All-in-one: Combines comments, annotations, bug reporting, and async video so teams donโt need 3 different tools.
Markdrop's answer:
Markdrop is built for:
Founders and indie builders who want fast feedback without complex tools
Designers and PMs collecting client or stakeholder feedback
Developers who want bug reports with context, not vague screenshots
Agencies delivering websites and apps that need client review In short, itโs for lean product teams who value clarity and speed.
Markdrop's answer:
Markdrop was born out of frustration. As a solo founder building multiple products, I (Manuel) kept running into the same feedback pain, long email chains, vague bug reports, and overpriced tools that did too much or too little. So I built what I needed: a clean, no-fuss tool to drop comments directly on a site, see what users saw, and get back to shipping.
Markdrop's answer:
Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?
Frontend: Svelte 5 Backend: Cloudflare Workers, D1, and Durable Objects Database: Wrangler DB (D1) DevOps/Infra: Cloudflare Pages + R2 for static assets and file storage
Markdrop's answer:
Indie founders using Markdrop to launch and iterate faster
Agencies working with clients.
YC applicants using it to get fast design review
No-code builders collecting client feedback inside Webflow
Internal product teams replacing Slack screenshots with structured feedback
We use Apollo with our Sales and BDR team to manage our cold outreach. The strength of the platform is the sequences and cadences that you can set up. Compared to other tools we have used in the past like Salesloft the UI is much easier to navigate. The main limitation is that the quality of data isn't as vast and often I can find prospects on Linkedin but not in Apollo.
Based on our record, Apollo.io seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 69 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Personal email domains destroy this. Clearbit's Enrichment API returns a null company when it hits gmail.com. Apollo routes personal domains straight to a consumer bucket and skips B2B fields entirely. Even PDL's /person/enrich endpoint โ the most permissive of the major providers โ gives you around 32% hit rate on Gmail addresses versus 74% on corporate domains. I measured this across 6,200 signups for a... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
A few things worth flagging: PDL beats Clearbit's historical rates for US and Western European companies, but drops to ~52% match rate for Japan and South Korea specifically. Apollo underperforms on raw company matching but returns significantly more contacts per domain in Prospector-style queries than Clearbit's Prospector ever did โ the tradeoff is more stale titles in the result set. Hunter.io is fast and cheap... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
One thing comparison guides consistently get wrong: Clay is not an enrichment API. It's a waterfall orchestration tool that calls People Data Labs, Apollo, Clearbit, and others in sequence for you. It's useful, but it adds 2โ8 seconds of latency per row in my runs and costs more per match than going direct. For a CRM webhook flow where you need sub-second enrichment calls, Clay is the wrong layer to hit first. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Last year I ran the same LinkedIn Sales Navigator export through three enrichment APIs. Apollo matched 61% of the emails. Hunter.io matched 54%. An OSINT-first pipeline I'd built in n8n โ pulling from public sources before hitting any paid API โ matched 79% and cost roughly $0.003 per contact. The delta wasn't magic. It was sequence. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Despite having its LinkedIn Page removed in 2025, Apollo remains a functional enrichment and outreach platform with 275M+ contacts. The free tier includes 10,000 credits and the $49/month basic plan is the cheapest entry point for a combined enrichment-plus-sequencing workflow. Apollo's data collection methods have attracted LinkedIn's attention, but the product continues to operate. The risk I'd assign it:... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
ZoomInfo - ZoomInfo is a B2B database providing detailed business information on people and companies.
BugHerd - BugHerd: The Website Feedback Tool for Agencies
Lusha - Search less. Sell more.
Pastel - Sticky note-based feedback collection tool for live websites
Hunter.io - Find all the email addresses related to a domain
Webvizio - This free website feedback tool & website review software allows managers and teams to collaborate on website revisions in real time. Join for free now!