Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apollo.io VS localhost.run

Compare Apollo.io VS localhost.run and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Apollo.io logo Apollo.io

Apolloโ€™s predictive prospecting, sales engagement, and actionable analytics help the teams to reach its full revenue potential.

localhost.run logo localhost.run

Instantly share your localhost environment!
  • Apollo.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-08
  • localhost.run Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24

Apollo.io features and specs

  • Comprehensive Database
    Apollo.io offers a vast and up-to-date contact database, which is ideal for lead generation and sales prospecting.
  • Advanced Search Filters
    The platform provides powerful filtering options that allow users to narrow down potential leads by various criteria, making it easier to target specific audiences.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Apollo.io integrates seamlessly with popular CRM tools like Salesforce and HubSpot, streamlining the workflow for sales teams.
  • Email Tracking
    The email tracking feature helps sales teams monitor engagement and follow up effectively, thereby increasing the chances of closing deals.
  • Customization and Automation
    Users can customize outreach templates and automate follow-up sequences, improving efficiency and ensuring consistent communication.

Possible disadvantages of Apollo.io

  • Pricing
    The platform can be expensive, especially for small businesses or startups with limited budgets.
  • Data Accuracy
    Some users report that contact information can occasionally be outdated or inaccurate, leading to ineffective outreach.
  • Learning Curve
    The platform's extensive features may require a significant amount of time to learn and utilize effectively, posing challenges for new users.
  • Support Limitations
    Customer support may not be as responsive or comprehensive as some users would like, potentially leading to delays in issue resolution.
  • Overdependence on Technology
    Relying too much on the platform's automation features can sometimes lead to reduced personalization in outreach efforts, which can affect engagement.

localhost.run features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Localhost.run provides a simple way to expose your local server to the internet without requiring complex configurations or additional software installations.
  • No Installation Required
    You can use localhost.run directly from your terminal without the need to install any software or dependencies.
  • Free and Instantaneous
    Localhost.run offers a free service, and you can quickly start tunneling without any wait times or sign-ups.
  • Wide Compatibility
    It works with any web server running on your local machine, making it highly versatile.

Possible disadvantages of localhost.run

  • Stability and Uptime
    As a free service, localhost.run may not be as reliable as paid alternatives, potentially leading to unexpected downtimes.
  • Limited Customization
    Localhost.run doesn't offer many advanced features or customizations, which may be a drawback for more complex use cases.
  • Security
    By exposing your local server to the internet, there could be potential security risks if your server is not properly configured or secured.
  • Performance
    The performance of the tunnel can be slower compared to running the server locally due to additional network hops and bandwidth limitations.

Analysis of Apollo.io

Overall verdict

  • Apollo.io is generally well-regarded in its space, especially for businesses looking to enhance their sales intelligence and outreach processes. Most users appreciate its robust feature set and user-friendly interface.

Why this product is good

  • Apollo.io is considered good by many users because it provides a comprehensive sales engagement platform with features like a vast and accurate database of contacts, powerful searching and filtering tools, and automated outreach capabilities. It helps sales teams improve their prospecting efficiency and effectiveness.

Recommended for

  • Sales teams looking to streamline their prospecting efforts
  • Businesses seeking a reliable source of contact data
  • Organizations that want to automate and optimize their outreach campaigns
  • Companies of all sizes aiming to enhance their lead generation strategies

Analysis of localhost.run

Overall verdict

  • Localhost.run is a good tool for developers who need a fast, efficient, and secure way to share their local development environments. Its ease of use and minimal setup make it an excellent choice for quick sharing and testing scenarios.

Why this product is good

  • Localhost.run is a service that provides a quick and easy way to expose a local server to the internet. It is often praised for its simplicity, ease of use, and minimal setup requirements. It allows developers to share their work quickly for collaboration, testing, or demonstration purposes without needing to deploy to a public server. It uses a secure SSH tunnel, which adds a layer of security to the service.

Recommended for

  • Developers who need to demo their work to clients or teams
  • Collaborative programming and real-time feedback
  • Testing webhooks or APIs from an external source
  • Temporary exposure of local servers for testing purposes

Apollo.io videos

Free software to find email addresses - apollo.io review

More videos:

  • Review - โ€œFeature Fatigue Kills UXโ€ by Lily Chen, senior software engineer at Apollo.io

localhost.run videos

No localhost.run videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apollo.io and localhost.run)
Lead Generation
100 100%
0% 0
Localhost Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Sales Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Webhooks
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apollo.io and localhost.run. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apollo.io and localhost.run

Apollo.io Reviews

  1. michelleturner
    ยท Managing Director at Nuvoro Digital ยท
    Apollo for automated outreach

    We use Apollo with our Sales and BDR team to manage our cold outreach. The strength of the platform is the sequences and cadences that you can set up. Compared to other tools we have used in the past like Salesloft the UI is much easier to navigate. The main limitation is that the quality of data isn't as vast and often I can find prospects on Linkedin but not in Apollo.

    ๐Ÿ Competitors: SalesLoft
    ๐Ÿ‘ Pros:    Creating email sequences|Ab testing of emails|Good user experience
    ๐Ÿ‘Ž Cons:    Data quality is lacking sometimes|Onboardin process was cumbersome

Best AI Prospecting Tools for B2B Sales in 2026
What is the best AI prospecting tool for B2B sales in 2026? The best tool depends on your team's specific situation. toflow.ai is a strong fit for multi-channel outreach across email, LinkedIn, and WhatsApp, and is the only platform in this list with native MCP support for Claude and ChatGPT-based prospecting. Apollo.io is the leading option for teams needing a large contact...
Source: toflow.ai
11 Apollo.io Alternatives and Competitors 2024
FAQWhatโ€™s better than Apollo.io?What Apollo.io competitors are better for lead generation? What is Apollo.io used for?
Source: evaboot.com
Top 15+ Apollo.io Competitors & Alternatives [2024]
Unlike some other Apollo.io competitors, Reply is also great for engaging potential customers. The platform boasts multichannel outreach options and cloud calling. You can also use it to send personalized outreach, including videos created on Vidyard.
Source: www.kaspr.io
15 Best Apollo.io Alternatives to Find Verified B2B Leads (2024)
FindThatLead is affordable, with plans for individuals and small teams. If you just need the basic contact details for leads, FindThatLead is a practical alternative to look at instead of Apollo.io.

localhost.run Reviews

Tunnelling services for exposing localhost to the web
localhost.run is very similar to Serveo but with less features. In fact, as far as I can tell, it only does 1 thing: expose your local web server to the web with a public URL. And it does that well enough for me.
Source: chenhuijing.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apollo.io should be more popular than localhost.run. It has been mentiond 69 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apollo.io mentions (69)

  • Enriching Free Trial Signups: The PLG Data Stack for Turning Inbound Users Into Qualified Pipeline
    Personal email domains destroy this. Clearbit's Enrichment API returns a null company when it hits gmail.com. Apollo routes personal domains straight to a consumer bucket and skips B2B fields entirely. Even PDL's /person/enrich endpoint โ€” the most permissive of the major providers โ€” gives you around 32% hit rate on Gmail addresses versus 74% on corporate domains. I measured this across 6,200 signups for a... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Clearbit Is Now HubSpot-Only: A 1-to-1 API Migration Map for Teams Getting Locked Out
    A few things worth flagging: PDL beats Clearbit's historical rates for US and Western European companies, but drops to ~52% match rate for Japan and South Korea specifically. Apollo underperforms on raw company matching but returns significantly more contacts per domain in Prospector-style queries than Clearbit's Prospector ever did โ€” the tradeoff is more stale titles in the result set. Hunter.io is fast and cheap... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Auto-Enriching Your CRM on New Contact Creation: A No-Code Webhook Playbook
    One thing comparison guides consistently get wrong: Clay is not an enrichment API. It's a waterfall orchestration tool that calls People Data Labs, Apollo, Clearbit, and others in sequence for you. It's useful, but it adds 2โ€“8 seconds of latency per row in my runs and costs more per match than going direct. For a CRM webhook flow where you need sub-second enrichment calls, Clay is the wrong layer to hit first. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • How to Build an OSINT-Powered B2B Prospecting Workflow in 2026 (Without Getting Banned)
    Last year I ran the same LinkedIn Sales Navigator export through three enrichment APIs. Apollo matched 61% of the emails. Hunter.io matched 54%. An OSINT-first pipeline I'd built in n8n โ€” pulling from public sources before hitting any paid API โ€” matched 79% and cost roughly $0.003 per contact. The delta wasn't magic. It was sequence. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • LinkedIn Scraping Is Dead: 5 Legal, ToS-Safe Alternatives That Actually Work in 2026
    Despite having its LinkedIn Page removed in 2025, Apollo remains a functional enrichment and outreach platform with 275M+ contacts. The free tier includes 10,000 credits and the $49/month basic plan is the cheapest entry point for a combined enrichment-plus-sequencing workflow. Apollo's data collection methods have attracted LinkedIn's attention, but the product continues to operate. The risk I'd assign it:... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
View more

localhost.run mentions (42)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apollo.io and localhost.run, you can also consider the following products

ZoomInfo - ZoomInfo is a B2B database providing detailed business information on people and companies.

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

Lusha - Search less. Sell more.

sish - An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.

Hunter.io - Find all the email addresses related to a domain

LocalXpose - Your network without the IT work. Radically simple, always-on tunneling service for mission-critical applications.