Apollo.io Reviews

1. michelleturner

   · Managing Director at Nuvoro Digital · 10 months ago
   Apollo for automated outreach

   We use Apollo with our Sales and BDR team to manage our cold outreach. The strength of the platform is the sequences and cadences that you can set up. Compared to other tools we have used in the past like Salesloft the UI is much easier to navigate. The main limitation is that the quality of data isn't as vast and often I can find prospects on Linkedin but not in Apollo.

   🏁 Competitors: SalesLoft

   👍 Pros:    Creating email sequences|Ab testing of emails|Good user experience

   👎 Cons:    Data quality is lacking sometimes|Onboardin process was cumbersome

CapSolver Reviews

1. georkings

   7 months ago
   High Success Rate, Exceptional Support

   I use Capsolver to solve mainly recaptcha v2 and v3 via API. It helps me to bypass those captcha with a good success rate. It's a cheap service with very good documentation for API service, and the staff is very helpful and friendly. Capsolver solves recaptcha v2 pretty fast and with an extremely high success rate. When I've had problems with v3, they have helped me out to increase the success rate.

   🏁 Competitors: NextCaptcha
2. DamnKarma

   · Engineer at Bosch · over 2 years ago
   Best working Capcha solver!

   I've been using CapSolver for a while now, and it has been a game-changer when it comes to dealing with those annoying captchas. This addon simplifies the whole process and saves me a ton of time. It's incredibly reliable and efficient, making it a must-have tool for anyone who encounters captchas regularly. I appreciate the convenience it brings to my online activities, and I highly recommend CapSolver to anyone looking for a dependable captcha-solving solution.

   🏁 Competitors: NopeCHA, hektCapcha

   👍 Pros:    Fast|Active live support|Very reliable|Best captcha solver available
3. Luna5829

   almost 3 years ago

   I recently tried out Capsolver in my app, and I'm fairly impressed with its accuracy. There are some issues regarding speed, where if you try to send multiple requests at the same time (with threading), it can take a really long time (4 requests all at once took upwards of 45 seconds), but that's solved using proxies. It was also extremely easy to integrate it into my program, and the API is really user-friendly.

   👍 Pros:    Accuracy|User-friendly|Api integration

   👎 Cons:    Speed

Apollo.io mentions (69)

• Enriching Free Trial Signups: The PLG Data Stack for Turning Inbound Users Into Qualified Pipeline

  Personal email domains destroy this. Clearbit's Enrichment API returns a null company when it hits gmail.com. Apollo routes personal domains straight to a consumer bucket and skips B2B fields entirely. Even PDL's /person/enrich endpoint — the most permissive of the major providers — gives you around 32% hit rate on Gmail addresses versus 74% on corporate domains. I measured this across 6,200 signups for a... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• Clearbit Is Now HubSpot-Only: A 1-to-1 API Migration Map for Teams Getting Locked Out

  A few things worth flagging: PDL beats Clearbit's historical rates for US and Western European companies, but drops to ~52% match rate for Japan and South Korea specifically. Apollo underperforms on raw company matching but returns significantly more contacts per domain in Prospector-style queries than Clearbit's Prospector ever did — the tradeoff is more stale titles in the result set. Hunter.io is fast and cheap... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago

• Auto-Enriching Your CRM on New Contact Creation: A No-Code Webhook Playbook

  One thing comparison guides consistently get wrong: Clay is not an enrichment API. It's a waterfall orchestration tool that calls People Data Labs, Apollo, Clearbit, and others in sequence for you. It's useful, but it adds 2–8 seconds of latency per row in my runs and costs more per match than going direct. For a CRM webhook flow where you need sub-second enrichment calls, Clay is the wrong layer to hit first. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• How to Build an OSINT-Powered B2B Prospecting Workflow in 2026 (Without Getting Banned)

  Last year I ran the same LinkedIn Sales Navigator export through three enrichment APIs. Apollo matched 61% of the emails. Hunter.io matched 54%. An OSINT-first pipeline I'd built in n8n — pulling from public sources before hitting any paid API — matched 79% and cost roughly $0.003 per contact. The delta wasn't magic. It was sequence. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

• LinkedIn Scraping Is Dead: 5 Legal, ToS-Safe Alternatives That Actually Work in 2026

  Despite having its LinkedIn Page removed in 2025, Apollo remains a functional enrichment and outreach platform with 275M+ contacts. The free tier includes 10,000 credits and the $49/month basic plan is the cheapest entry point for a combined enrichment-plus-sequencing workflow. Apollo's data collection methods have attracted LinkedIn's attention, but the product continues to operate. The risk I'd assign it:... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

CapSolver mentions (0)