Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache ZooKeeper VS Backendless

Compare Apache ZooKeeper VS Backendless and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Apache ZooKeeper logo Apache ZooKeeper

Apache ZooKeeper is an effort to develop and maintain an open-source server which enables highly reliable distributed coordination.

Backendless logo Backendless

Backendless is a mobile Backend as a Service (mBaaS) platform.
  • Apache ZooKeeper Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-21
  • Backendless Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-20

Apache ZooKeeper features and specs

  • High Availability
    ZooKeeper is designed to be highly available, with built-in redundancy and failover mechanisms that ensure minimal downtime.
  • Consistency
    It follows a strict consistency model, ensuring that reads reflect the most recent writes, which is crucial for coordination and configuration management.
  • Scalability
    ZooKeeper can handle a high number of read operations and can be scaled horizontally by adding more nodes to the ensemble.
  • Leader Election
    ZooKeeper simplifies the implementation of leader election processes, making it easier to design fault-tolerant distributed systems.
  • Cluster Management
    It aids in cluster management by providing mechanisms to track the status and configuration of nodes across a distributed system.
  • Watch Mechanism
    ZooKeeper provides a watch mechanism that allows clients to be notified of data changes, helping to keep state synchronized across systems.

Possible disadvantages of Apache ZooKeeper

  • Complexity
    Setting up and managing a ZooKeeper ensemble can be complex, requiring careful configuration and maintenance.
  • Resource Intensive
    ZooKeeper can be resource-intensive, requiring significant memory and CPU, especially in large deployments.
  • Write Performance
    While read operations are very fast, write operations can be slower due to the need to achieve consensus among ZooKeeper nodes.
  • Operational Overhead
    Managing ZooKeeper involves operational overhead, including monitoring, backups, and handling node failures.
  • Limited Programming Language Support
    Although ZooKeeper supports many major languages, the client libraries for some languages may not be as mature or well-supported as those for others.
  • Transaction Size
    ZooKeeper is not designed for very large data or complex transactions, limiting its use cases to lightweight coordination tasks.

Backendless features and specs

  • Codeless Development
    Backendless offers a 'Codeless' feature, which allows users to build backend logic without writing any code. This is particularly beneficial for those who are not familiar with complex coding languages.
  • Real-Time Database
    The platform provides real-time data synchronization, allowing applications to update data instantly across all clients. This is essential for interactive applications such as chat apps and real-time data feeds.
  • API Services
    Backendless allows the creation of REST and SOAP APIs effortlessly. This makes it easier to integrate with other services and provides a clear pathway for extending app functionality.
  • User Management
    The platform comes with built-in user management features such as registration, login, password recovery, and social logins. This helps in reducing the effort required to implement user authentication and authorization.
  • Mobile and Web App Support
    Backendless supports both mobile (iOS/Android) and web applications, offering SDKs for multiple platforms which streamlines the development process.

Possible disadvantages of Backendless

  • Pricing
    Although Backendless offers a free tier, many features and higher usage levels are locked behind a paywall. This may be prohibitive for startups or small projects with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    Even though Backendless offers codeless development, mastering the platform as a whole can be challenging for beginners. There are many features and settings that require some time to understand fully.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Relying too much on Backendless-specific features can create difficulties if you decide to migrate to another backend service in the future. The migration process can be complex and time-consuming.
  • Limited Customization
    While Backendless offers many out-of-the-box features, there can be limitations in terms of customizing the backend behavior in comparison to building a custom backend.
  • Community and Support
    The community around Backendless is smaller compared to more established backend solutions like Firebase. This can make finding community support, third-party plugins, or comprehensive tutorials harder.

Analysis of Apache ZooKeeper

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Apache ZooKeeper is considered a good choice for scenarios involving distributed system coordination, thanks to its proven track record, robust performance, and active community support.

Why this product is good

  • Apache ZooKeeper is highly regarded for its reliability, simplicity, and efficiency as a centralized service for maintaining configuration information, naming, providing distributed synchronization, and providing group services. It is widely used for coordinating distributed systems and streamlining complex operations across multiple nodes, due to its strong consistency guarantees and leader-election capabilities.

Recommended for

  • Distributed applications needing coordination and synchronization
  • Systems requiring leader election
  • Applications that benefit from centralized metadata management
  • Frameworks like Hadoop, Kafka, and HBase which use ZooKeeper for coordination tasks

Apache ZooKeeper videos

Why do we use Apache Zookeeper?

More videos:

  • Review - 4.5. Apache Zookeeper | Hands-On - Getting Started

Backendless videos

Backendless 5 Release Overview (webinar)

More videos:

  • Review - Functionality Visibility Control in Backendless Console
  • Review - Backendless version 3.0 Overview

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache ZooKeeper and Backendless)
Web And Application Servers
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Web Servers
100 100%
0% 0
Databases
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache ZooKeeper and Backendless. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache ZooKeeper and Backendless

Apache ZooKeeper Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache ZooKeeper yet.
Be the first one to post

Backendless Reviews

2023 Firebase Alternatives: Top 10 Open-Source & Free
There are three comprehensive plans of this BaaS vendor: Backendless Cloud, Pro and Managed. But it only opened the pricing details of Backendless Cloud in this regard. Here are the key components of Backendless Cloud pricing:
Firebase Alternatives โ€“ Top 10 Competitors
Backendless is a highly scalable mobile Backend-as-a-Service (mBaaS) platform providing gazillion of features, including user authentication, live audio and video streaming, message filtering, push notifications, auto-scalability, data persistence, file storage, geo-location, cloud-code, analytics, and custom business logic. It has it all what you need to build awesome...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache ZooKeeper should be more popular than Backendless. It has been mentiond 33 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache ZooKeeper mentions (33)

View more

Backendless mentions (21)

  • Ap Developer
    Go here: https://backendless.com/ . If that don't work for you, Let me know and I'll tell you what next to do. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Join the Free Database Training Course From Backendless
    This article first appeared on https://backendless.com. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • free-for.dev
    Backendless.com โ€” Mobile and Web Baas, with 1 GB file storage free, push notifications 50000/month, and 1000 data objects in table. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • How Much Does Custom Software Development Cost?
    Luckily, instead of building the backend from scratch, some backend Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) are available. Consider the following options: REST API, Firebase, Backendless, and JHipster. Using APIs is a great way to adopt a functional backend with lower custom software development pricing. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • Urgent: Low code / No Code App Builders
    The best no-code/low-code platform for building both the frontend and backend in one place is Backendless. They have the best backend features and a really solid UI Builder that gives you pretty much all capabilities you'll likely need. Source: about 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache ZooKeeper and Backendless, you can also consider the following products

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

Firebase - Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications for mobile and web.

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

Datomic - The fully transactional, cloud-ready, distributed database

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

MarkLogic Server - MarkLogic Server is a multi-model database that has both NoSQL and trusted enterprise data management capabilities.