Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Xerces VS Apache Anakia

Compare Apache Xerces VS Apache Anakia and see what are their differences

Apache Xerces logo Apache Xerces

Advanced XML parser, including support for XML Schema, DOM Level 2, and SAX.

Apache Anakia logo Apache Anakia

XML Databases
  • Apache Xerces Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-20
  • Apache Anakia Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-02-08

Apache Xerces features and specs

  • Standards Compliance
    Apache Xerces is highly compliant with XML standards, including XML Schema, DOM, and SAX, which ensures robust processing and validation of XML documents.
  • Wide Language Support
    Xerces offers support for multiple programming languages, including Java, C++, and Perl, providing flexibility and integration in various development environments.
  • Community Support
    Being an Apache Software Foundation project, Xerces benefits from strong community support and regular updates, which enhances reliability and addresses security concerns.
  • Extensibility
    The library is designed to be extensible, allowing developers to customize its behavior and extend its capabilities to meet specific needs.
  • Open Source
    Xerces is open-source software, available for free under the Apache License, making it a cost-effective solution for both personal and commercial use.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Xerces

  • Complexity
    The extensive features and capabilities of Xerces can lead to increased complexity, which might be overwhelming for developers who need a simple XML solution.
  • Performance Overheads
    Due to its comprehensive feature set and strict standards compliance, Xerces might introduce performance overheads compared to simpler XML parsing libraries.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users may find Xerces challenging to learn, especially if they are not already familiar with XML and related technologies.
  • Limited Non-XML Functionality
    Xerces is specifically focused on XML parsing and validation, which means it lacks features for handling other types of data or file formats.
  • Deprecation and Maintenance
    Some aspects of the library may not be actively maintained or could become deprecated, potentially leading to compatibility and security issues over time.

Apache Anakia features and specs

  • Easy Integration
    Anakia is easy to integrate with existing Java projects, leveraging Apache Velocity for transforming XML documents into other text formats.
  • Efficiency
    Anakia is efficient for projects that require processing and transforming XML data, thanks to its template-based approach.
  • Template Flexibility
    Supports the full range of Velocity template capabilities, providing a flexible way to define the layout and output format.
  • Lightweight
    As a relatively small tool, Anakia is lightweight, making it a good choice for projects that do not require a complex or bulky XML processing framework.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Anakia

  • Limited Features
    Anakia is mainly designed for simple transformations and may not support complex XML transformations as well as other dedicated frameworks.
  • Dependency on Apache Velocity
    Since Anakia relies on Apache Velocity, any limitations in Velocity could impact Anakia's effectiveness in certain scenarios.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    For developers unfamiliar with Velocity, there may be a learning curve to effectively utilizing Anakia for XML transformations.
  • Lack of Active Development
    Anakia is not as actively maintained as newer XML processing tools, which might result in less community support and fewer updates.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Xerces and Apache Anakia)
Task Management
45 45%
55% 55
Databases
43 43%
57% 57
Text Editors
43 43%
57% 57
NoSQL Databases
56 56%
44% 44

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Xerces and Apache Anakia. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Xerces seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Xerces mentions (1)

  • What second language to learn after Python?
    Well, regarding HTML5, what I've found was libxml (does not support tag-soup HTML5), https://github.com/lexbor/lexbor, for which I was unable to find good documentation ( see https://lexbor.com/docs/lexbor/#dom), Apache Xerces (appears to not support tag-soup HTML5 as well), and Gumbo, which does not appear to be active and to support selectors and XPath (although there are libraries that add that). Source: almost 4 years ago

Apache Anakia mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Apache Anakia yet. Tracking of Apache Anakia recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Xerces and Apache Anakia, you can also consider the following products

MarkLogic - Schema-agnostic Enterprise NoSQL database technology, coupled w/ powerful search & flexible application services

Qizx - XML Databases

BaseX - BaseX is a very light-weight, high-performance and scalable XML Database engine and XPath/XQuery...

Apache Santuario - Apache Santuario - Index

eXistdb - High-performance native XML database engine and all-in-one solution for application building.

Sonic XML Server - Considering Sonic XML Server for your business? Updated for 2020! Access FAQ and important tips before choosing.