Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Sonic XML Server VS Apache Xerces

Compare Sonic XML Server VS Apache Xerces and see what are their differences

Sonic XML Server logo Sonic XML Server

Considering Sonic XML Server for your business? Updated for 2020! Access FAQ and important tips before choosing.

Apache Xerces logo Apache Xerces

Advanced XML parser, including support for XML Schema, DOM Level 2, and SAX.
  • Sonic XML Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-14
  • Apache Xerces Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-20

Sonic XML Server features and specs

  • High Performance
    Sonic XML Server is designed to efficiently handle XML data, offering fast processing times due to its optimized architecture.
  • Scalability
    The server can scale to accommodate increasing loads, making it a good fit for growing businesses that anticipate increased traffic and data processing needs.
  • Integration
    Sonic XML Server offers robust integration capabilities, allowing for seamless communication with other systems and services.
  • Security
    The server includes security features designed to protect data in transit and at rest, ensuring that sensitive information is well guarded.

Possible disadvantages of Sonic XML Server

  • Complex Setup
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex and may require specialized knowledge or training.
  • Cost
    The cost of Sonic XML Server might be prohibitive for smaller businesses or those with limited budgets, due to licensing fees and potential need for additional hardware.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running the server can be resource-intensive, requiring significant hardware resources which may lead to increased operational costs.
  • Limited Support
    Users might find that support options are limited or inadequate, potentially leading to delays in resolving technical issues.

Apache Xerces features and specs

  • Standards Compliance
    Apache Xerces is highly compliant with XML standards, including XML Schema, DOM, and SAX, which ensures robust processing and validation of XML documents.
  • Wide Language Support
    Xerces offers support for multiple programming languages, including Java, C++, and Perl, providing flexibility and integration in various development environments.
  • Community Support
    Being an Apache Software Foundation project, Xerces benefits from strong community support and regular updates, which enhances reliability and addresses security concerns.
  • Extensibility
    The library is designed to be extensible, allowing developers to customize its behavior and extend its capabilities to meet specific needs.
  • Open Source
    Xerces is open-source software, available for free under the Apache License, making it a cost-effective solution for both personal and commercial use.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Xerces

  • Complexity
    The extensive features and capabilities of Xerces can lead to increased complexity, which might be overwhelming for developers who need a simple XML solution.
  • Performance Overheads
    Due to its comprehensive feature set and strict standards compliance, Xerces might introduce performance overheads compared to simpler XML parsing libraries.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users may find Xerces challenging to learn, especially if they are not already familiar with XML and related technologies.
  • Limited Non-XML Functionality
    Xerces is specifically focused on XML parsing and validation, which means it lacks features for handling other types of data or file formats.
  • Deprecation and Maintenance
    Some aspects of the library may not be actively maintained or could become deprecated, potentially leading to compatibility and security issues over time.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Sonic XML Server and Apache Xerces)
Data Integration
100 100%
0% 0
Text Editors
36 36%
64% 64
ETL
100 100%
0% 0
Databases
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Sonic XML Server and Apache Xerces. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Xerces seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Sonic XML Server mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Sonic XML Server yet. Tracking of Sonic XML Server recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Apache Xerces mentions (1)

  • What second language to learn after Python?
    Well, regarding HTML5, what I've found was libxml (does not support tag-soup HTML5), https://github.com/lexbor/lexbor, for which I was unable to find good documentation ( see https://lexbor.com/docs/lexbor/#dom), Apache Xerces (appears to not support tag-soup HTML5 as well), and Gumbo, which does not appear to be active and to support selectors and XPath (although there are libraries that add that). Source: over 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Sonic XML Server and Apache Xerces, you can also consider the following products

MarkLogic - Schema-agnostic Enterprise NoSQL database technology, coupled w/ powerful search & flexible application services

Qizx - XML Databases

IBM App Connect - IBM App Connect is the all-in-one integration tool for connecting apps, integrating data, building APIs and acting on events

Apache Anakia - XML Databases

Azure Service Bus - Learn how to set up messaging that connects applications and services across on-premises and cloud environments. Tutorials, videos, API references, and more.

Apache Santuario - Apache Santuario - Index