Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache Traffic Server VS NPM SimpleHTTPServer

Compare Apache Traffic Server VS NPM SimpleHTTPServer and see what are their differences

Apache Traffic Server logo Apache Traffic Server

Fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/S 2 and 1.1 compliant caching proxy server.

NPM SimpleHTTPServer logo NPM SimpleHTTPServer

NPM SimpleHTTPServer is a compact web server for the management of the static files.
  • Apache Traffic Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29
  • NPM SimpleHTTPServer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-10

Apache Traffic Server features and specs

  • High Performance
    Apache Traffic Server is designed for high-speed caching and can handle large volumes of traffic efficiently. Its architecture allows it to serve requests with low latency, making it suitable for high-traffic websites and applications.
  • Scalability
    It offers robust scalability features, allowing it to manage multiple terabytes of data and scale up to handle many clients simultaneously, which is beneficial for growing businesses and expanding infrastructure.
  • Extensibility
    Traffic Server supports plugins and extensions, enabling developers to customize and extend its functionality to suit specific needs, which adds flexibility for unique requirements.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, Apache Traffic Server offers a free solution with a strong community support, allowing users to collaborate and contribute to its development and troubleshoot issues.
  • SSL Termination
    It provides the capability to handle SSL termination, which offloads the burden from backend servers, improving overall security and performance for HTTPS traffic.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Traffic Server

  • Complex Configuration
    The configuration of Apache Traffic Server can be complex, especially for beginners, which might require a steep learning curve and extensive documentation reading or seeking community help.
  • Limited Windows Support
    Traffic Server is primarily developed for Unix-based systems and has limited support for Windows, which can be a limitation for organizations that primarily operate in a Windows environment.
  • Community Support
    While it benefits from open-source community support, it may not have the same level of professional support or comprehensive documentation as some commercial alternatives, potentially leading to slower resolution of issues.
  • Resource Intensive
    When handling large amounts of traffic, Apache Traffic Server can become resource-intensive, which may necessitate higher hardware investments to maintain optimal performance.

NPM SimpleHTTPServer features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis of NPM SimpleHTTPServer

Overall verdict

  • SimpleHTTPServer-style packages on npm (such as http-server) are lightweight, reliable tools for quickly serving static files during development, making them a good choice for their intended purpose.

Why this product is good

  • Extremely easy to set up and run with a single command, requiring minimal configuration
  • Great for quickly serving static HTML, CSS, and JavaScript files during local development
  • Lightweight with few dependencies, so it installs and runs fast
  • Useful for testing static sites and prototypes without setting up a full web server stack
  • Cross-platform and works anywhere Node.js is installed

Recommended for

  • Front-end developers who need to preview static websites locally
  • Developers building quick prototypes or demos
  • Beginners learning web development who need a simple local server
  • Testing static assets before deploying to production
  • Situations where a full-featured server like Apache or Nginx would be overkill

Apache Traffic Server videos

Transparent HTTP proxying with Apache Traffic Server

More videos:

  • Review - Yahoo's Adventure with Apache Traffic Server - Shu Kit Chan, Vijay Prashanth Hosahithlu

NPM SimpleHTTPServer videos

No NPM SimpleHTTPServer videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache Traffic Server and NPM SimpleHTTPServer)
Proxy Server
100 100%
0% 0
Web Servers
0 0%
100% 100
Proxy
100 100%
0% 0
Web And Application Servers

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Traffic Server and NPM SimpleHTTPServer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Traffic Server seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache Traffic Server mentions (6)

  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Apache Traffic Server โ€” A free, fast, and scalable HTTP caching system that improves network efficiency. It supports forward and reverse proxy caching and is configurable to run simultaneously on either or both options. It also provides authentication and basic authorization through plugins. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Wikipedia now has up to 1000X reduction of ATS disk read latency at the p999
    Apache Traffic Server: https://trafficserver.apache.org/ Hereโ€™s how they use it along with Varnish: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Caching_overview. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • How does Content delivery/distribution network work?
    The LARGE majority of CDNs use either Apache Traffic Server (https://trafficserver.apache.org/) or Nginx for their cache webserver, so the mechanisms used are pretty easy to find if you look through the docs. Source: about 4 years ago
  • Using Nginx as an Object Storage Gateway
    Apache Traffic Server (no relation to Apache itself) would be an excellent option: https://trafficserver.apache.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
  • Build a CDN in about 5 hours
    We have choices. We could use Varnish (scripting! Edge side includes! PHK blog posts!). We could use Apache Traffic Server (being the only new team this year to use ATS!). Or we could use NGINX (we're already running it!). The only certainty is that you'll come to hate whichever one you pick. Try them all and pick the one you hate the least. - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago
View more

NPM SimpleHTTPServer mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of NPM SimpleHTTPServer yet. Tracking of NPM SimpleHTTPServer recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache Traffic Server and NPM SimpleHTTPServer, you can also consider the following products

Squid Proxy - Website Content Acceleration and Distribution. Thousands of web-sites around the Internet use Squid to drastically increase their content delivery. Squid can reduce your server load and improve delivery speeds to clients.

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

WinGate - WinGate is highly capable web proxy software for Windows: caching, intercepting, forward and reverse proxy with https inspection and SSL offload, SOCKS server, email

Caddy - The HTTP/2 Web Server with Automatic HTTPS

Varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows