Software Alternatives & Startups

Apache Traffic Server VS CCProxy

Compare Apache Traffic Server VS CCProxy and see what are their differences

Apache Traffic Server

Fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/S 2 and 1.1 compliant caching proxy server.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
CCProxy

Want to share Internet connection? Get every computer online through a single Internet connection?

Rating
5.0 · 1 review

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Apache Traffic Server seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 6 times since March 2021.

social mentions
6 vs 0
Proxy Server popularity
60% vs 40%
alternatives listed
161 vs 109

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Apache Traffic Server
CCProxy
Website trafficserver.apache.org youngzsoft.net
Pricing
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Apache Traffic Server 5 features
CCProxy 5 features
  • High Performance
    Apache Traffic Server is designed for high-speed caching and can handle large volumes of traffic efficiently. Its architecture allows it to serve requests with low latency, making it suitable for high-traffic websites and applications.
  • Scalability
    It offers robust scalability features, allowing it to manage multiple terabytes of data and scale up to handle many clients simultaneously, which is beneficial for growing businesses and expanding infrastructure.
  • Extensibility
    Traffic Server supports plugins and extensions, enabling developers to customize and extend its functionality to suit specific needs, which adds flexibility for unique requirements.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, Apache Traffic Server offers a free solution with a strong community support, allowing users to collaborate and contribute to its development and troubleshoot issues.
  • SSL Termination
    It provides the capability to handle SSL termination, which offloads the burden from backend servers, improving overall security and performance for HTTPS traffic.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Configuration
    The configuration of Apache Traffic Server can be complex, especially for beginners, which might require a steep learning curve and extensive documentation reading or seeking community help.
  • Limited Windows Support
    Traffic Server is primarily developed for Unix-based systems and has limited support for Windows, which can be a limitation for organizations that primarily operate in a Windows environment.
  • Community Support
    While it benefits from open-source community support, it may not have the same level of professional support or comprehensive documentation as some commercial alternatives, potentially leading to slower resolution of issues.
  • Resource Intensive
    When handling large amounts of traffic, Apache Traffic Server can become resource-intensive, which may necessitate higher hardware investments to maintain optimal performance.
  • Ease of Use
    CCProxy offers an intuitive user interface that simplifies the process of setting up and configuring proxy servers, making it accessible even for users with limited technical expertise.
  • Multi-Protocol Support
    The software supports a wide range of protocols including HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and more, allowing it to cater to diverse networking needs.
  • User Management
    CCProxy provides robust user management features, enabling administrators to efficiently control and monitor user activities and bandwidth usage.
  • Access Control
    It includes access control functionalities that allow admins to block unwanted sites and set internet access restrictions based on IP addresses or domains.
  • Cache Management
    The software offers effective caching mechanisms to improve internet browsing speed and reduce bandwidth consumption by storing frequently accessed data.

Possible disadvantages

  • Windows Only
    CCProxy is only compatible with Windows operating systems, which could be a limitation for users who operate on macOS or Linux platforms.
  • Limited Free Version
    The free version of CCProxy has restricted functionalities, encouraging users to purchase the full version for comprehensive features.
  • Scalability Issues
    For larger enterprises, CCProxy might lack the advanced scalability features that are necessary to efficiently handle large volumes of traffic.
  • Basic Reporting
    The reporting and analytics features are relatively basic, which might not meet the requirements of organizations seeking in-depth network analysis.
  • Customer Support
    The availability and responsiveness of technical support could be improved to provide faster assistance for troubleshooting and user queries.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Apache Traffic Server 2 videos + Add
CCProxy 3 videos + Add

Transparent HTTP proxying with Apache Traffic Server

More videos

  • - Yahoo's Adventure with Apache Traffic Server - Shu Kit Chan, Vijay Prashanth Hosahithlu

Let's have a look at CCProxy

More videos

  • - instalar ccproxy y configurarlo
  • - how to install ccproxy . bitvise ssh client . proxifier fake ip

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Apache Traffic Server
CCProxy
60% 60%
40% 40%
57% 57%
43% 43%
63% 63%
37% 37%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Traffic Server and CCProxy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Apache Traffic Server no reviews yet
CCProxy 5.0 · 1 review

We have no reviews of Apache Traffic Server yet. Be the first one to post

  • The best for small office with 25 computers .
    SaaSHub review
    · Mar 2021

    Complete , simple and powerfull , all option for band control included ! But free for only 3 user . I have not found better 20' min for reading instruction, installing and setup for non expert , (3' min for expert ) !

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Apache Traffic Server 6 mentions
CCProxy 0 mentions
  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Apache Traffic Server — A free, fast, and scalable HTTP caching system that improves network efficiency. It supports forward and reverse proxy caching and is configurable to run simultaneously on either or both options. It also provides... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Wikipedia now has up to 1000X reduction of ATS disk read latency at the p999
    Apache Traffic Server: https://trafficserver.apache.org/ Here’s how they use it along with Varnish: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Caching_overview. - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
  • How does Content delivery/distribution network work?
    The LARGE majority of CDNs use either Apache Traffic Server (https://trafficserver.apache.org/) or Nginx for their cache webserver, so the mechanisms used are pretty easy to find if you look through the docs. Source: over 4 years ago

View more

Tracking CCProxy since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Apache Traffic Server and CCProxy

When comparing Apache Traffic Server and CCProxy, you can also consider the following products.