Software Alternatives & Startups

Apache Traffic Server VS 3proxy

Compare Apache Traffic Server VS 3proxy and see what are their differences

Apache Traffic Server

Fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/S 2 and 1.1 compliant caching proxy server.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
3proxy

3proxy freeware proxy server for Windows and Unix. HTTP, SOCKS, FTP, POP3

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Apache Traffic Server should be more popular than 3proxy. It has been mentioned 6 times since March 2021.

social mentions
6 vs 1
Proxy Server popularity
62% vs 38%
alternatives listed
109 vs 92

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Apache Traffic Server
3
3proxy
Website trafficserver.apache.org 3proxy.ru
Pricing
Open source
—
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Apache Traffic Server 5 features
3
3proxy 4 features
  • High Performance
    Apache Traffic Server is designed for high-speed caching and can handle large volumes of traffic efficiently. Its architecture allows it to serve requests with low latency, making it suitable for high-traffic websites and applications.
  • Scalability
    It offers robust scalability features, allowing it to manage multiple terabytes of data and scale up to handle many clients simultaneously, which is beneficial for growing businesses and expanding infrastructure.
  • Extensibility
    Traffic Server supports plugins and extensions, enabling developers to customize and extend its functionality to suit specific needs, which adds flexibility for unique requirements.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, Apache Traffic Server offers a free solution with a strong community support, allowing users to collaborate and contribute to its development and troubleshoot issues.
  • SSL Termination
    It provides the capability to handle SSL termination, which offloads the burden from backend servers, improving overall security and performance for HTTPS traffic.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Configuration
    The configuration of Apache Traffic Server can be complex, especially for beginners, which might require a steep learning curve and extensive documentation reading or seeking community help.
  • Limited Windows Support
    Traffic Server is primarily developed for Unix-based systems and has limited support for Windows, which can be a limitation for organizations that primarily operate in a Windows environment.
  • Community Support
    While it benefits from open-source community support, it may not have the same level of professional support or comprehensive documentation as some commercial alternatives, potentially leading to slower resolution of issues.
  • Resource Intensive
    When handling large amounts of traffic, Apache Traffic Server can become resource-intensive, which may necessitate higher hardware investments to maintain optimal performance.
  • Lightweight
    3proxy is a very lightweight proxy server, which makes it suitable for running on low-resource systems and can be easily managed with minimal overhead.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source software, 3proxy allows users to inspect, modify, and enhance the source code to suit their specific needs.
  • Highly Configurable
    3proxy provides a high level of configurability, allowing users to tailor it for a wide range of use cases, from simple web proxying to complex network setups.
  • Supports Multiple Protocols
    It supports a variety of protocols, including HTTP, HTTPS, SOCKS, and FTP, making it versatile for different applications.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Apache Traffic Server 2 videos + Add
3
3proxy 1 video + Add

Transparent HTTP proxying with Apache Traffic Server

More videos

  • - Yahoo's Adventure with Apache Traffic Server - Shu Kit Chan, Vijay Prashanth Hosahithlu

Setting up ipv6 proxies using 3proxy libraries.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Apache Traffic Server
3
3proxy
62% 62%
38% 38%
67% 67%
33% 33%
55% 55%
45% 45%
55% 55%
45% 45%

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache Traffic Server and 3proxy. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Apache Traffic Server 6 mentions
3
3proxy 1 mention
  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Apache Traffic Server — A free, fast, and scalable HTTP caching system that improves network efficiency. It supports forward and reverse proxy caching and is configurable to run simultaneously on either or both options. It also provides... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Wikipedia now has up to 1000X reduction of ATS disk read latency at the p999
    Apache Traffic Server: https://trafficserver.apache.org/ Here’s how they use it along with Varnish: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Caching_overview. - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
  • How does Content delivery/distribution network work?
    The LARGE majority of CDNs use either Apache Traffic Server (https://trafficserver.apache.org/) or Nginx for their cache webserver, so the mechanisms used are pretty easy to find if you look through the docs. Source: over 4 years ago

View more

  • How to set up TCP/UDP transparent proxy with iptables
    Also, not all SOCKS5 servers support UDP associate. Dante, 3proxy and gost support it, but ssh -D doesn't. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

Alternatives to Apache Traffic Server and 3proxy

When comparing Apache Traffic Server and 3proxy, you can also consider the following products.