Apache Struts VS EngFlow

• Robust Framework
  Apache Struts is a mature and well-established framework for Java web applications, providing stable and reliable tools for enterprise-level applications.
• MVC Architecture
  Struts adheres to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) design pattern, which separates business logic, presentation, and navigation, making code maintenance and development easier.
• Extensive Documentation
  Struts has comprehensive documentation and a wealth of online resources, including tutorials, community forums, and user guides, which can support developers throughout their projects.
• Rich Tag Library
  It comes with a rich set of custom tags that enhance the JSP (JavaServer Pages) to create dynamic web content easily.
• Plugin Support
  Apache Struts supports various plugins that can extend its functionality, allowing developers to integrate additional features without much effort.

Possible disadvantages

• Steep Learning Curve
  New developers might find Struts challenging to learn due to its complexity and the need for a good understanding of the MVC architecture and Java web application development.
• Configuration Overhead
  The framework requires extensive XML configuration, which can be cumbersome and time-consuming compared to convention-over-configuration frameworks.
• Performance
  Struts can be slower than some newer, lighter frameworks due to its broader feature set and the overhead associated with its extensive configuration.
• Security Vulnerabilities
  Struts has had notable security vulnerabilities in the past. Although patches and updates are available, it necessitates proactive monitoring and maintenance.
• Outdated Compared to Modern Frameworks
  With the advent of modern frameworks like Spring MVC and JavaServer Faces, some developers consider Struts to be less up-to-date with the latest web development standards and practices.

• Fast Build and Test Execution
  EngFlow provides a remote execution and caching platform that dramatically accelerates build and test times by distributing work across clusters of machines and reusing previously computed results, reducing developer wait times significantly.
• Bazel Compatibility
  EngFlow is built to be fully compatible with Bazel's remote execution API (as well as other build systems that support the Remote Execution API), making it straightforward to integrate into existing Bazel-based workflows without major migration efforts.
• Scalable Infrastructure
  The platform is designed to scale to support large engineering organizations with thousands of developers, handling massive build workloads efficiently through distributed remote execution clusters, whether on-premises or in the cloud.
• Build Observability and Analytics
  EngFlow offers detailed build and test result analytics, providing visibility into build performance, cache hit rates, flaky tests, and resource utilization, enabling teams to identify bottlenecks and optimize their CI/CD pipelines.
• Founded by Bazel Experts
  EngFlow was founded by former Google engineers who worked on Bazel and Google's internal build system (Blaze), lending deep expertise and credibility to the product's design and its ability to address real-world build system challenges at scale.

Possible disadvantages

• Niche Market Focus
  EngFlow is primarily targeted at organizations already using Bazel or compatible build systems with the Remote Execution API. Teams using other build systems like Gradle, Maven, or CMake without RE API support may find limited applicability.
• Cost Considerations
  As a commercial enterprise platform, EngFlow can be expensive, particularly for smaller teams or startups. The pricing for managed remote execution infrastructure may be a significant investment compared to self-hosted or open-source alternatives.
• Complex Setup and Configuration
  Setting up remote execution and caching infrastructure, even with EngFlow's managed platform, can involve significant initial configuration effort including networking, authentication, and tuning build rules for remote compatibility.
• Limited Public Documentation and Community
  Compared to widely adopted open-source CI/CD tools, EngFlow has a smaller public community and less freely available documentation, which can make troubleshooting and knowledge sharing more challenging without direct vendor support.
• Vendor Lock-in Risk
  Relying on EngFlow's proprietary platform for critical build infrastructure introduces a degree of vendor dependency. Migrating away to another remote execution backend or self-managed solution could require significant effort and planning.

Finding and Fixing Apache Struts CVE-2017-5638 with Black Duck Hub

More videos

No EngFlow videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• 17 Popular Java Frameworks for 2023: Pros, cons, and more
  raygun.com · Nov 2022

  You can integrate Struts with other Java frameworks to perform tasks that aren’t built into the platform. For instance, you can use the Spring plugin for dependency injection or the Hibernate plugin for...

• 10 Best Java Frameworks You Should Know
  www.simplilearn.com · Feb 2022

  Followed by Struts Framework, the next leading framework currently being used in the IT industry is the Wicket.

We have no reviews of EngFlow yet. Be the first one to post

• 1 an experienta intr-un domeniu irelevant, now what?

  The Apache Struts website (https://struts.apache.org/) offers tutorials and other resources for learning about the Apache Struts framework. Source: almost 4 years ago

• Most Popular Web Application Frameworks

  3) Struts 2 - Also a popular java based framework. Backed by the Apache Foundation and built to easily integrate with Spring. This is the easiest choice when converting from a Struts 1 framework to a more modern and secure framework. - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago

Tracking EngFlow since Oct 2021.