Apache Struts VS Editor.js

• Robust Framework
  Apache Struts is a mature and well-established framework for Java web applications, providing stable and reliable tools for enterprise-level applications.
• MVC Architecture
  Struts adheres to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) design pattern, which separates business logic, presentation, and navigation, making code maintenance and development easier.
• Extensive Documentation
  Struts has comprehensive documentation and a wealth of online resources, including tutorials, community forums, and user guides, which can support developers throughout their projects.
• Rich Tag Library
  It comes with a rich set of custom tags that enhance the JSP (JavaServer Pages) to create dynamic web content easily.
• Plugin Support
  Apache Struts supports various plugins that can extend its functionality, allowing developers to integrate additional features without much effort.

Possible disadvantages

• Steep Learning Curve
  New developers might find Struts challenging to learn due to its complexity and the need for a good understanding of the MVC architecture and Java web application development.
• Configuration Overhead
  The framework requires extensive XML configuration, which can be cumbersome and time-consuming compared to convention-over-configuration frameworks.
• Performance
  Struts can be slower than some newer, lighter frameworks due to its broader feature set and the overhead associated with its extensive configuration.
• Security Vulnerabilities
  Struts has had notable security vulnerabilities in the past. Although patches and updates are available, it necessitates proactive monitoring and maintenance.
• Outdated Compared to Modern Frameworks
  With the advent of modern frameworks like Spring MVC and JavaServer Faces, some developers consider Struts to be less up-to-date with the latest web development standards and practices.

• Modular Architecture
  Editor.js is designed with a modular architecture, allowing users to add and remove tools (blocks) as needed, which provides flexibility and extensibility.
• Block Style Editor
  The editor uses a block-style approach, where each type of content (paragraphs, images, videos, etc.) is treated as a separate block, making complex layouts easier to manage and edit.
• Clean JSON Output
  Produces structured JSON data that is easy to parse and process, which is beneficial for storing content in a database or serving it via an API.
• API Flexibility
  Offers a well-documented API that developers can use to create custom tools and extensions, enhancing the editor's functionality and adapting it to specific use cases.
• Lightweight & Fast
  The editor is lightweight and performs well, offering a responsive experience for users, even on less powerful devices.
• Open Source
  As an open-source project, Editor.js allows developers to contribute to its development and tailor it to their own needs without licensing fees.
• Rich Plugin Ecosystem
  A variety of plugins are available that extend the core functionality of Editor.js, covering a wide range of use-cases from simple text editing to complex multimedia integration.

Possible disadvantages

• Steep Learning Curve
  While powerful, the modular architecture can be confusing for new users who are not familiar with block-based editors.
• Limited Built-In Tools
  Out-of-the-box, Editor.js provides only basic functionality, requiring additional plugins or custom development for more advanced features.
• Dependency on JavaScript
  Editor.js heavily relies on JavaScript, which might be a limitation for environments where JavaScript is restricted or needs to be minimized.
• Plugin Compatibility
  Since the ecosystem includes plugins developed by various contributors, there may be issues with compatibility or stability between different plugins.
• Configuration Complexity
  Setting up and configuring Editor.js with all necessary tools and plugins can be time-consuming and complex, requiring a good understanding of JavaScript and its ecosystem.
• Lack of Native Features
  Some features that are standard in other rich-text editors, like WYSIWYG capabilities, are not natively available in Editor.js, necessitating additional development.
• Accessibility Concerns
  Ensuring the editor meets accessibility standards (e.g., WCAG) might require extra effort, as not all plugins and customizations may adhere to best practices.

Finding and Fixing Apache Struts CVE-2017-5638 with Black Duck Hub

More videos

Editor.js - An Awesome Next Gen Block Styled Content Editor!

More videos

• 17 Popular Java Frameworks for 2023: Pros, cons, and more
  raygun.com · Nov 2022

  You can integrate Struts with other Java frameworks to perform tasks that aren’t built into the platform. For instance, you can use the Spring plugin for dependency injection or the Hibernate plugin for...

• 10 Best Java Frameworks You Should Know
  www.simplilearn.com · Feb 2022

  Followed by Struts Framework, the next leading framework currently being used in the IT industry is the Wicket.

• 14 Best Open Source WYSIWYG HTML Editors
  itsfoss.com · Sep 2023

  Editor.js gives you the perks of a block-style editor. The headings, paragraphs, and other items are all separate blocks, which makes them editable while not affecting the rest of the content.

• 1 an experienta intr-un domeniu irelevant, now what?

  The Apache Struts website (https://struts.apache.org/) offers tutorials and other resources for learning about the Apache Struts framework. Source: almost 4 years ago

• Most Popular Web Application Frameworks

  3) Struts 2 - Also a popular java based framework. Backed by the Apache Foundation and built to easily integrate with Spring. This is the easiest choice when converting from a Struts 1 framework to a more modern and secure framework. - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago

Tracking Editor.js since Mar 2021.