Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Apache HTTP Server VS ejabberd

Compare Apache HTTP Server VS ejabberd and see what are their differences

Apache HTTP Server logo Apache HTTP Server

Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

ejabberd logo ejabberd

ejabberd is a robust, massively scalable and extensible XMPP server.
  • Apache HTTP Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-21
  • ejabberd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-22

Apache HTTP Server features and specs

  • Open Source
    Apache HTTP Server is open source, meaning it is freely available for anyone to use, modify, and distribute. This promotes a large, active community that contributes to its maintenance and improvement.
  • Cross-Platform
    Apache is compatible with a variety of operating systems, including Unix, Linux, and Windows, providing flexibility and widespread usability.
  • Highly Customizable
    It offers a modular architecture that allows users to enable or disable features as needed, and to extend functionality through modules.
  • Robust Documentation
    Apache provides comprehensive and detailed documentation, which makes it easier for users to install, configure, and troubleshoot the server.
  • Widespread Adoption
    With its long history and widespread use, Apache has proven to be reliable and trusted by many organizations worldwide, ensuring a level of trust and stability.
  • Rich Feature Set
    Apache includes many features out-of-the-box, such as SSL/TLS support, URL redirection, authentication, load balancing, and more.

Possible disadvantages of Apache HTTP Server

  • Performance Overhead
    Compared to some lightweight web servers like Nginx, Apache can have higher memory and CPU usage, which may not be ideal for high concurrency needs.
  • Complex Configuration
    Apache's extensive customization options can lead to a complex configuration process, which may be challenging for beginners or those without specific expertise.
  • Less Efficient in Serving Static Content
    While Apache is highly capable, it may be less efficient at serving static content compared to specialized web servers like Nginx.
  • Initial Learning Curve
    Due to its rich features and configurability, new users might face a steep learning curve when first setting up and using Apache HTTP Server.
  • Module Compatibility Issues
    Sometimes, third-party modules may not always be compatible with the latest versions of Apache, causing potential integration issues.

ejabberd features and specs

  • Scalability
    ejabberd is designed to handle large numbers of concurrent users, making it highly scalable. Its architecture can efficiently manage thousands of connections, catering to large-scale deployments.
  • High Availability
    It supports clustering and distributed deployments, ensuring that services remain available even when single nodes fail, thus providing robust reliability.
  • Compliance with Standards
    ejabberd complies with XMPP standards and protocols, ensuring compatibility with other XMPP-based applications and services.
  • Extensibility and Customization
    Offers flexibility via modules, allowing developers to extend and customize its functionalities to fit specific use cases, thanks to its modular architecture.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Works on multiple operating systems, including Linux, Windows, and MacOS, providing flexibility in deployment environments.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, ejabberd benefits from a community of developers contributing to its growth and improvement.

Possible disadvantages of ejabberd

  • Complex Setup and Configuration
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for those unfamiliar with Erlang, the language ejabberd is written in.
  • Resource Intensive
    Given its scalability features, ejabberd can be resource-intensive, which might be overkill for small-scale applications.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might experience a learning curve when integrating and maintaining ejabberd, mainly due to its extensive feature set.
  • Documentation Quality
    While the documentation is comprehensive, it might be perceived as less user-friendly or lacking in examples, which could hinder new developers.
  • Erlang Requirement
    Development or troubleshooting may require knowledge of Erlang, which is not as widely used or known as other programming languages.

Analysis of Apache HTTP Server

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Apache HTTP Server is generally considered a good and reliable web server.

Why this product is good

  • Apache HTTP Server is one of the most widely used and established web servers in the world. It is open-source, highly configurable, and supports a wide range of features through modules. Its robustness, extensive documentation, strong community support, and flexibility are some of the reasons it remains popular.

Recommended for

  • Developers and organizations looking for a reliable and versatile web server solution.
  • Those who need extensive customization and configuration options for their web environment.
  • Users who prefer an established platform with a large community and extensive documentation.
  • Teams that require compatibility with various operating systems and environments.

Apache HTTP Server videos

No Apache HTTP Server videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

ejabberd videos

Build a Cordova Chat APP using Strophe and eJabberd : XMPP Basics

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Apache HTTP Server and ejabberd)
Web And Application Servers
Group Chat & Notifications
Web Servers
100 100%
0% 0
Communication
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Apache HTTP Server and ejabberd. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Apache HTTP Server and ejabberd

Apache HTTP Server Reviews

9 Best XAMPP Alternatives Cross Platform Web Server
However, compared to XAMPP and other popular web servers in the market Apache HTTP Server is a bit more complicated and is a little difficult to navigate for a complete newbie, but if you want to understand web development from the very fundamentals and understand how Apache as a web server software works then this software can be of great help to you.
Litespeed vs Nginx vs Apache: Web Server Showdown
The most commonly used Web Server is by far Apache HTTP Server from the Software Apache Foundation. Created in 1995 by Rob McCool and Brian Behlendorf, among others. The name is a pun for A PatCHy server, as at the time of itโ€™s inception, Apache was based on some existing code, along with some perhaps โ€œhacky or clunkyโ€ software packages, enabling it to run. Additionally, the...
Source: chemicloud.com
10 Best alternatives of XAMPP servers for Windows, Linux and macOS
Apache is an open-source and free web server software that owns about 46% of websites worldwide. The official name is Apache HTTP Server and is maintained and developed by the Apache Software Foundation. This allows website owners to serve content on the web โ€“ hence the name โ€œwebserverโ€.
Top 5 open source web servers
As the Apache HTTP Server has been the most popular web server since 1996, it "benefits from great documentation and integrated support from other software projects." You can find more information on the Apache Foundation project page.
Source: opensource.com

ejabberd Reviews

We have no reviews of ejabberd yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache HTTP Server seems to be a lot more popular than ejabberd. While we know about 71 links to Apache HTTP Server, we've tracked only 2 mentions of ejabberd. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Apache HTTP Server mentions (71)

View more

ejabberd mentions (2)

  • What you gonna add to your selfhost stack this year?
    Also a fan of XMPP, ejabberd.im is a formidable piece of software that pretty much just works once you have it all set up and configured. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Alternative to Signal
    It supports voice and video calls, and you use it on your own server (like prosody.im and ejabberd.im). It's also really simple to get a user to create an account on a server you run/a public one and.... It does not require a phone number or an email address. Source: over 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Apache HTTP Server and ejabberd, you can also consider the following products

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

Openfire - Openfire (formerly Wildfire) is a cross-platform instant messaging (IM) and groupchat server.

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

Prosody - Prosody is a modern flexible communications server for Jabber/XMPP written in Lua.

LiteSpeed Web Server - LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

Matrix.org - Matrix is an open standard for decentralized persistent communication over IP.