
Figma
UXpin
Sketch
ProtoPie
Invision
Mockplus
Balsamiq
Adobe XD is an all-in-one UX/UI solution for designing websites, mobile apps and more.

PDF Generator API
PDFShift
DocRaptor
PDFCrowd
pdflayer
PDF Toolkit API
Doczilla
Generate PDFs, images and Word or PowerPoint files from JSON with Jinja2, Liquid or Handlebars templates. Autocomplete from your data, page-accurate preview, EU hosting.

Which is more popular?
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | adobe.com | formfeed.dev |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | Startup from the United States | 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Adobe XD yet.
Formfeed turns templates and JSON into print-ready PDFs and images. Write HTML templates in Jinja2, Liquid or Handlebars in an editor whose preview paginates like the PDF, or tag the Word and PowerPoint files your team already uses. Render them with one API call from your code (SDKs for...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Sketch vs Adobe XD: Which One Should You Use?
More videos
No Formfeed.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Adobe XD and Formfeed.dev.
Formfeed.dev's answer:
Formfeed treats document templates like code. You write them in Jinja2, Liquid or Handlebars, or tag a Word or PowerPoint file, preview them in an editor that paginates like the final PDF, and render them with one API call. A CLI keeps templates in Git with snapshot tests and pull-request previews, and release channels let a template change roll out like a deploy. Rendering and storage run in Frankfurt (EU) by default.
Formfeed.dev's answer:
Switching is quick: apitemplate.io, PDFMonkey and jsreport templates import directly, and an apitemplate.io-compatible endpoint keeps existing integrations working. Data stays in the EU by default, with rendering and storage in Frankfurt and the sub-processors listed publicly. You choose the template language (Jinja2, Liquid or Handlebars) or use Word and PowerPoint files, with helpers for money, dates, QR codes, GiroCodes, barcodes and charts. Developers get SDKs for TypeScript and Python and a CLI, agents get an MCP server. Pricing is in EUR and simple: one unit is a PDF of up to five pages or one image, and 100 units a month are free.
Formfeed.dev's answer:
Developers whose product has to send documents: invoices, quotes, certificates, reports, tickets and social images. In particular teams that want document data to stay in the EU, teams moving off apitemplate.io or PDFMonkey, no-code builders who render from Zapier, Make or n8n, and developers building AI agents that produce documents.
Formfeed.dev's answer:
Formfeed is made in Germany and launched in 2026. It started from a simple conviction: a document template is code. It deserves an editor that knows your data, a preview you can trust, tests and a proper release process, rather than a drag-and-drop canvas. Keeping rendering and storage in the EU was part of the plan from the start, because invoices and contracts are full of personal data.
Formfeed.dev's answer:
TypeScript throughout, in an Nx monorepo. Documents are rendered by headless Chromium (Playwright) on Fly.io in Frankfurt, Word and PowerPoint files through LibreOffice (Gotenberg), and PDF tools use pdf-lib and qpdf. The API gateway and CDN run on Cloudflare Workers with Hono, files live in Cloudflare R2, and Supabase (Postgres) holds the data and handles sign-in. The app is Angular with the Monaco editor and Paged.js for the paginated preview; the template engines are Nunjucks, LiquidJS and Handlebars. The website is built with Astro, the docs with Docusaurus, and billing runs on Stripe.
Share your experience with using Adobe XD and Formfeed.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


While not a direct competitor to Figma regarding design capabilities, Zeplin serves as a bridge between designers and developers by providing a platform for sharing design specs, assets, and style guides. Its seamless...
Adobe XD gives Figma a run for its money as it’s loaded with robust features to make your visual content stand out. The software is generally easy-to-use for various visual content, concept mapping, and prototypes.
Furthermore, you can share your designs and collect feedback so you can iterate quickly without having to jump to a different tool. Adobe XD lets you do it all.
We have no reviews of Formfeed.dev yet. Be the first one to post
When comparing Adobe XD and Formfeed.dev, you can also consider the following products.

Team-based interface design, Figma lets you collaborate on designs in real time.
Compare Figma to Adobe XD or Formfeed.dev:

PDF generation API that turns your JSON data into documents from templates built with AI or a drag-and-drop editor, which your users can edit inside your app through a white-label embedded editor.
Compare PDF Generator API to Adobe XD or Formfeed.dev:

Design is really about solving problems. UXPin is the UX Design Platform that gets that right.
Compare UXpin to Adobe XD or Formfeed.dev:

Convert any HTML documents to high-fidelity PDF using a single POST request
Compare PDFShift to Adobe XD or Formfeed.dev:


As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more
Compare DocRaptor to Adobe XD or Formfeed.dev: