
Adalo
Bubble.io
FlutterFlow
Glide
zeroqode
Webflow
NoCode.tech
Airtable
Cppcheck
Clang Static Analyzer
Coverity Scan
lgtm.com
SonarQube
VisualCodeGrepper
Flawfinder
Parasoft C/C++test
Adalo
CppcheckCppcheck is recommended for C/C++ developers and development teams, particularly those responsible for maintaining large codebases or projects where code quality and reliability are paramount. It is also beneficial for educational purposes, where students and new developers can learn about potential pitfalls in C/C++ programming.
Based on our record, Cppcheck should be more popular than Adalo. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Adalo: Focuses on building true native mobile apps (iOS/Android) and PWAs. Great for directory apps, event apps, simple social apps. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Yes, I think no-code solution can work easily for this use case. There are no of solutions you can try and see which one fits best in your use case. https://bubble.io, https://drapcode.com, etc works best for web apps. If you need Mobile Apps, then you can try using https://adalo.com or Thunkable/GlideApps etc. - Source: Hacker News / almost 5 years ago
Thanks, but it look so expensive. For mobile app, I still evaluating thunkable.com and adalo.com. Source: almost 5 years ago
After dropping several hints in recent months, AWS finally launched the beta version of Amazon Honeycode, the companyโs spanking new rendition of a no-code product. For the longest time, customers of the no-code market segment have turned to brands like bubble.io and adalo.com for quick and engaging app development projects. But with Beta Honeycode now around, itโs interesting to see what tricks AWS has up its... Source: about 5 years ago
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 3 years ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: over 3 years ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: over 3 years ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 3 years ago
Bubble.io - Building tech is slow and expensive. Bubble is the most powerful no-code platform for creating digital products.
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
FlutterFlow - FlutterFlow is an online low-code platform that empowers people to build native mobile apps visually.
Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free
Glide - Send lightning fast video messages, see responses live or whenever it's convenient. Get closer to the ones you love with video communication.
lgtm.com - lgtm.com is a platform for code analytics.