Actioner
Zapier
PullNotifier
Workbot for Slack
Halp
Axolo for GitLab
Provision.ai
Make.com
Clearbit
Lusha
Apollo.io
DiscoverOrg
Hunter.io
ZoomInfo
UpLead
Lead411
Actioner is a no-code workflow automation platform. It allows you to connect your tools with each other and build human-in-the-loop automation.
Actioner works perfectly with Slack. It has an app directory (https://actioner.com/app-directory) full of Slack bots - these are built by the Actioner team using the platform. They are ready-to-use apps and just require you to connect Slack and the other tool you want to use in Slack.
With seamless integration, you can complete any task in your tool (HubSpot, Zendesk, Jira, PagerDuty, GitHub, Bitbucket, and more.) without leaving Slack. You can access a wide variety of use cases in our library (https://actioner.com/use-cases). You can explore use cases such as sales automation, incident management, ticket management, DevOps automation, pipeline and pull request management, and lots more.
Actioner allows you to turn Slack into a digital HQ with its extended capabilities to integrate any tool with open API with Slack and customize your Slack apps and workflows.
Actioner ClearbitActioner's answer
Actioner is a platform that allows users to build and automate workflows using AI from Slack. It also has an app directory full of pre-built workflows and apps tailored specifically for Slack.
Actioner's answer
Actioner does not have a direct competitor. But why the answer to "why use Actioner?" is; is to establish an AI-first company culture, turn Slack into a digital HQ through running any business operations without leaving Slack.
Actioner's answer
Our primary audience is AI enthusiasts, early adapters, tech geeks and of course Slack users.
Actioner's answer
Actioner was found in 2021 by a group of Ex-Atlassian employees--A team who has founded and developed the leading incident management tool, OpsGenie.
Actioner's answer
Actioner is used by various types of companies and industries, but for privacy concerns for now we prefer to not use any brand names.
Actioner's answer
For storage: AWS DynamoDB, AWS S3, ElasticSearch For computing: AWS ECS Fargate + AWS Lambda For network: AWS Route 53, AWS Cloudfront, AWS API Gateway, AWS ELB For messaging: AWS SQS, AWS SNS, AWS Kinesis
I liked how Actioner abstracts the use cases with dedicated apps while it also provides the ability to customize the entire behavior with platform capabilities.
Have been using Actioner for our internal ticketing; and it's working great! Their support team is also top notch! Price is fair, too, very advantageous especially when you use multiple apps.
Based on our record, Clearbit seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 18 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Some display names need a lookup table, not fuzzy strings. Pairs like Investing.com / Fusion Media Limited or Lyrie.ai / OTT Cybersecurity Inc. Share almost no tokens, so WRatio stays low and that's correct behavior. For irreconcilable aliases like that you still want GLEIF, Clearbit, or simply a maintained slug โ legal_name map. Fuzzy matching handles stylistic drift on the same name; it canโt handle unrelated... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Personal email domains destroy this. Clearbit's Enrichment API returns a null company when it hits gmail.com. Apollo routes personal domains straight to a consumer bucket and skips B2B fields entirely. Even PDL's /person/enrich endpoint โ the most permissive of the major providers โ gives you around 32% hit rate on Gmail addresses versus 74% on corporate domains. I measured this across 6,200 signups for a... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
A few things worth flagging: PDL beats Clearbit's historical rates for US and Western European companies, but drops to ~52% match rate for Japan and South Korea specifically. Apollo underperforms on raw company matching but returns significantly more contacts per domain in Prospector-style queries than Clearbit's Prospector ever did โ the tradeoff is more stale titles in the result set. Hunter.io is fast and cheap... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Match rate of 38% in my test, but the data quality on what it does match is solid: title, seniority, industry, company size all returned cleanly. If you're already in HubSpot and enriching form fills in-place, Clearbit/Breeze is probably your lowest-friction option even at lower match rates. If you're not in HubSpot, there's no reason to choose it over PDL or Prospeo. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
One thing comparison guides consistently get wrong: Clay is not an enrichment API. It's a waterfall orchestration tool that calls People Data Labs, Apollo, Clearbit, and others in sequence for you. It's useful, but it adds 2โ8 seconds of latency per row in my runs and costs more per match than going direct. For a CRM webhook flow where you need sub-second enrichment calls, Clay is the wrong layer to hit first. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Zapier - Connect the apps you use everyday to automate your work and be more productive. 1000+ apps and easy integrations - get started in minutes.
Lusha - Search less. Sell more.
PullNotifier - PullNotifier - a Github and Slack integration app. The most efficient Pull Request notifications on Slack -> PullNotifier allows you to see your team's latest pull request status without getting spammed with notifications.
Apollo.io - Apolloโs predictive prospecting, sales engagement, and actionable analytics help the teams to reach its full revenue potential.
Workbot for Slack - Work your apps from Slack
DiscoverOrg - DiscoverOrg is an IT sales intelligence platform providing technology marketers access to data, IT org charts, and real time projects.