Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

acme.sh VS GitHub Surf

Compare acme.sh VS GitHub Surf and see what are their differences

acme.sh

A pure Unix shell script implementing ACME client protocol and deploying SSL certificates.

Rating
0 reviews
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
GitHub Surf

Open repositories in a VSCode environment in your browser

No screenshot yet
Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, acme.sh seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 43 times since March 2021.

social mentions
43 vs 0
Software Development popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
27 vs 1

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

acme.sh
GitHub Surf
Website github.com github.surf
Pricing —
Open source
Listed in
Software Development Security & Privacy Web Servers SSL Certificates +1
Developer Tools Productivity Note Note Taking +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

acme.sh 6 features
GitHub Surf 4 features
  • Ease of Use
    acme.sh is simple to install and use because it is written in shell script. It does not require any external dependencies, which makes it lightweight and easy to set up.
  • Wide Platform Support
    The script is compatible with multiple operating systems, including Linux, macOS, and Windows (via WSL), which makes it versatile for different environments.
  • Supports Various DNS Providers
    acme.sh supports many DNS APIs out of the box, allowing users to automate DNS challenges with their preferred provider easily.
  • Automatic Renewal
    acme.sh can automatically renew certificates and deploy them, ensuring uninterrupted HTTPS service without manual intervention.
  • Customizable and Extendable
    Because it is a simple script, users can easily customize and extend its functionality to suit their specific needs.
  • No Root Necessary
    acme.sh does not require root access for installation and operation, improving security since it can be run without elevated privileges.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited GUI
    Since acme.sh is a command-line tool, those accustomed to graphical interfaces might find it less intuitive to manage, compared to web-based interfaces.
  • Learning Curve
    Though it is easy to use for those familiar with the command line, users new to the terminal may face a learning curve when first using acme.sh.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community that supports acme.sh, the support might not be as extensive or swift as commercial solutions, potentially leading to delays in troubleshooting.
  • Misconfiguration Risks
    Because the installation and configuration are done manually, there is a risk of errors or misconfiguration, especially for users unfamiliar with SSL/TLS certificates.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    GitHub Surf provides an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface that makes it accessible for both beginners and experienced users.
  • Integration with GitHub
    The tool seamlessly integrates with GitHub, allowing users to easily access repositories and track changes efficiently.
  • Real-Time Collaboration
    It supports real-time collaboration features, enabling multiple users to work on the same project simultaneously and see each other's edits instantly.
  • Visual Representation
    Provides a visual representation of project histories and branches, which helps in understanding the development process better.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Offline Capabilities
    GitHub Surf requires an internet connection for most functionalities, which limits its usability in offline scenarios.
  • Learning Curve
    Users new to GitHub or similar platforms might experience a learning curve when first using GitHub Surf, owing to its various features and tools.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users may experience performance lags or slower response times when working with large repositories.
  • Privacy Concerns
    As with any online tool, there might be concerns related to data privacy and security, especially when dealing with sensitive project information.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

acme.sh
GitHub Surf

No analysis of acme.sh yet.

Overall verdict

  • GitHub Surf appears to be a niche tool designed to enhance the experience of browsing and exploring GitHub repositories, offering a more visual or streamlined interface than GitHub's native UI. It seems useful for developers who want a faster or more intuitive way to navigate codebases, though as a smaller or newer service, it may lack the robustness, feature completeness, or long-term support of GitHub's official tools.

Why this product is good

  • Provides an alternative, potentially more visual or user-friendly way to browse GitHub repositories
  • May offer quicker navigation or discovery features compared to GitHub's default interface
  • Useful for developers who want to explore codebases without cloning them locally
  • Likely lightweight and focused on a specific browsing use case

Recommended for

  • Developers who frequently browse open-source repositories and want a different visual experience
  • Users looking for quick repository exploration without needing full GitHub account features
  • Casual coders or students exploring codebases for learning purposes
  • Those seeking alternative UI/UX for GitHub navigation as a supplementary tool

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

acme.sh 1 video + Add
GitHub Surf 0 videos + Add

Free SSL Let's Encrypt - Acme.sh - Wordpress - Openlitespeed

No GitHub Surf videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
acme.sh
GitHub Surf
100% 100%
Software Development
0% 0%
0% 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100%
100% 100%
Security & Privacy
0% 0%
0% 0%
Note Taking
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using acme.sh and GitHub Surf. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

acme.sh 43 mentions
GitHub Surf 0 mentions
  • Let's Encrypt has been down most of today
    Acme.sh is maintained by ZeroSSL. https://github.com/acmesh-official/acme.sh#2%EF%B8%8F%E2%83%A32%EF%B8%8F%E2%83%A3-about-this-repository. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • SSL certificate requirements are becoming obnoxious
    Lots of ACME software supports configuring CA fallbacks, so even if a CA is down hard for an extended period you can issue certificates with the others. Using LetsEncrypt and ZeroSSL together is a popular approach. If you need a stronger... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • I no longer have an old-school cert on my HTTPS site
    I was amazed by them having so much distrust of the various clients. Certbot is typically in the repositories for things like Debian/Ubuntu. My favourite client is probably - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

View more

Tracking GitHub Surf since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to acme.sh and GitHub Surf

When comparing acme.sh and GitHub Surf, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...