accessiBe
UserWay
axe DevTools
Siteimprove
Accessibility Checker Pro
A11yanalyzer
Wave
AllAccessible.org
Cppcheck
Clang Static Analyzer
Coverity Scan
lgtm.com
SonarQube
VisualCodeGrepper
Flawfinder
Parasoft C/C++test
accessiBe is the #1 fully automated, AI-powered, web accessibility solution for ADA and WCAG compliance.
The process of becoming compliant using accessiBe is a no-brainer: within 48 hours, after installing just a single line of code, your site is fully accessible and compliant, just like that.
On top of making your website accessible, we also provide a support litigation package, a monthly scan report, an accessibility statement, and thanks to the AI, a 24/7 accessibility maintenance.
accessiBe utilizes a foreground (interface) and a background (AI) components that, together, achieve full compliance. The system scans and analyzes your website using AI technology and applies all the required adjustments to become ADA and WCAG 2.1 compliant.
The solution was developed for 18 months of intensive work with people with disabilities, in collaboration with the lead developer of JAWS (the most common screen reader in the world), web accessibility experts, and legal advisers.
Thanks to accessiBe, every website owner now has an affordable, effortless, and a scalable web accessibility solution.
accessiBe CppcheckCppcheck is recommended for C/C++ developers and development teams, particularly those responsible for maintaining large codebases or projects where code quality and reliability are paramount. It is also beneficial for educational purposes, where students and new developers can learn about potential pitfalls in C/C++ programming.
Based on our record, Cppcheck should be more popular than accessiBe. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I was surprised to find how easily https://accessibe.com/ can add some accessibility options to an existing site this week. I was half expecting it to break the site styles when toggling through the options but it did a really fine job while keeping the character of the site intact. It was a one-line script include. Sure, itโs complex to build that all from scratch but thankfully we have services coming in to help. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Accessibility tip: accessibility overlays like accessiBe generally donโt work, and may even get you sued. Thereโs no shortcut to good accessibility. Get yourself dedicated accessibility testers and put real effort into this stuff. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
This company is accessiBe and they provide a solution that is automated and scalable, growing with you into the future as your site evolves. - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 3 years ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: over 3 years ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: over 3 years ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 3 years ago
UserWay - Accessibility isnโt just โcompliance.โ - Itโs revenue, brand loyalty, and better UX.
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
axe DevTools - Efficient and effective accessibility testing is here.
Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free
Siteimprove - Consider the Siteimprove Intelligence Platform the newest member of your team.
lgtm.com - lgtm.com is a platform for code analytics.
