Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

3proxy VS Netmaker

Compare 3proxy VS Netmaker and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

3proxy logo 3proxy

3proxy freeware proxy server for Windows and Unix. HTTP, SOCKS, FTP, POP3

Netmaker logo Netmaker

Netmaker automates mesh VPN's and software-defined networks using WireGuard.
  • 3proxy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-11-04
  • Netmaker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-12

3proxy features and specs

  • Lightweight
    3proxy is a very lightweight proxy server, which makes it suitable for running on low-resource systems and can be easily managed with minimal overhead.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source software, 3proxy allows users to inspect, modify, and enhance the source code to suit their specific needs.
  • Highly Configurable
    3proxy provides a high level of configurability, allowing users to tailor it for a wide range of use cases, from simple web proxying to complex network setups.
  • Supports Multiple Protocols
    It supports a variety of protocols, including HTTP, HTTPS, SOCKS, and FTP, making it versatile for different applications.

Netmaker features and specs

  • Scalability
    Netmaker is designed to easily scale with growing network demands, making it suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises.
  • Performance
    The platform optimizes for speed and low-latency connections, which enhances overall network efficiency and user experience.
  • Security
    Netmaker provides robust security features, including encryption and controlled access, which help protect network data and reduce vulnerabilities.
  • Automation
    Automated network management features simplify the process of setting up and maintaining virtual networks, reducing manual work and potential errors.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Netmaker supports a wide range of operating systems, allowing seamless integration across diverse device landscapes.

Possible disadvantages of Netmaker

  • Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex, requiring a certain level of technical knowledge, which might be challenging for non-technical users.
  • Cost
    While offering a free tier, the advanced features and enterprise-level services come at a cost that might not fit within all organizations' budgets.
  • Limited Support
    As of now, support options may be limited, which could be a drawback for users who require extensive customer service or immediate assistance.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its comprehensive features and capabilities, new users might experience a steep learning curve when adapting to the platform.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running the software might be resource-intensive on certain systems, potentially requiring upgrades or additional hardware investment.

3proxy videos

Setting up ipv6 proxies using 3proxy libraries.

Netmaker videos

免费开源的组网神器NetMaker,wireguard协议LAN to LAN对等网络

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Netmaker v0.2 - Site to Site and Gateway over WireGuard Tutorial
  • Review - Netmaker - A powerful, open source, self hosted, GUI for setting up Wireguard networks and VPNs.
  • Review - Automated Failover / Relay for WireGuard ® Networks with Netmaker EE

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to 3proxy and Netmaker)
Proxy Server
100 100%
0% 0
VPN
0 0%
100% 100
Network & Admin
100 100%
0% 0
Security & Privacy
0 0%
100% 100

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing 3proxy and Netmaker.

What makes your product unique?

Netmaker's answer:

  1. Netmaker uses kernel WireGuard, which makes it way faster and more modern than the alternatives.
  2. Netmaker can also be fully "self-hosted" so you don't have to rely on a 3rd party with potential access to your sensitive data. 3 Netmaker creates a Mesh VPN, which is like the best of software-defined networking, zero trust, and VPNs all combined into one.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Netmaker's answer:

Netmaker is faster, more configurable, cheaper, and can be fully-self hosted. With Netmaker, you're in control.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Netmaker's answer:

IT admins, sysadmins, DevOps, InfraOps, platform engineers, and developers.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Netmaker's answer:

WireGuard, Golang, and Docker.

User comments

Share your experience with using 3proxy and Netmaker. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Netmaker seems to be a lot more popular than 3proxy. While we know about 63 links to Netmaker, we've tracked only 1 mention of 3proxy. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

3proxy mentions (1)

  • How to set up TCP/UDP transparent proxy with iptables
    Also, not all SOCKS5 servers support UDP associate. Dante, 3proxy and gost support it, but ssh -D doesn't. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

Netmaker mentions (63)

  • PrivateVPN is horrible. Don't do it.
    With Netmaker, you can have greater control and customization by assigning dedicated IP addresses to specific nodes within your network. I just stumble upon it yesterday, check it out. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Benefit of connect device under NAT to VPN network
    These days, I'm trying to deploy full mesh VPN network with netmaker. It is really easy to use and manage. However there are something makes me confused. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Web based self service CA for OpenVPN
    If a TCP based protocol isn't an absolute must have, I'd ditch OpenVPN for Wireguard with some kind of management overlay. e.g netmaker. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Tailscale increased free plan user limit form 1 to 3 and device cap to 100 also... unlimited subnets
    Do the net maker https://github.com/gravitl/netmaker worth trying to use instead of Tailscale? Tailscale is good, but I can watch YouTube over Wi-Fi in another country, but when I try to use Jellyfin to watch movies it’s not loading well. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Tips & Tricks for Productivity with Android E-Ink Devices (Obsidian, Syncthing, Weylus, RustDesk, Termux, KDE Connect, ZeroTier)
    Very relatable! At first, I struggled for days trying to make Netmaker or Innernet functional for my personal home server (Raspberry Pi behind multiple routers). But then I stumbled upon ZeroTier, and everything worked seamlessly within a couple of hours. Tailscale was actually the next one on my list because I heard many positive things about it over at r/selfhosted (especially about headscale). However, I did... Source: over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing 3proxy and Netmaker, you can also consider the following products

Squid Proxy - Website Content Acceleration and Distribution. Thousands of web-sites around the Internet use Squid to drastically increase their content delivery. Squid can reduce your server load and improve delivery speeds to clients.

TailScale - Private networks made easy Connect all your devices using WireGuard, without the hassle. Tailscale makes it as easy as installing an app and signing in.

Apache Traffic Server - Fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/S 2 and 1.1 compliant caching proxy server.

ZeroTier - Extremely simple P2P Encrypted VPN

WinGate - WinGate is highly capable web proxy software for Windows: caching, intercepting, forward and reverse proxy with https inspection and SSL offload, SOCKS server, email

Twingate - Simply Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)