Table of contents
Open Source
Code::Blocks is open-source software, which means it is free to use, modify, and distribute. This makes it accessible to a wide audience, including students and hobbyists.
Cross-Platform
It runs on Windows, Linux, and macOS, allowing developers to maintain a consistent development environment across different operating systems.
Plug-in Extensibility
The IDE supports plugins, enabling users to extend its functionality easily. This provides flexibility and customization to meet specific development needs.
Lightweight
Code::Blocks is relatively lightweight compared to some other IDEs, leading to faster load times and less resource consumption on the host machine.
Multiple Compiler Support
It supports multiple compilers, including GCC, Clang, and MSVC, giving developers the freedom to choose their preferred tools.
Promote Code::Blocks. You can add any of these badges on your website.
Code::Blocks is generally considered a 'good' IDE if your priorities include simplicity, ease of installation, and customization through plugins. It may not have as many advanced features as some other IDEs, but it is a solid choice for educational purposes and for those who need a lightweight, no-frills environment for C/C++ development.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Code::Blocks is good.
Check the traffic stats of Code::Blocks on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Code::Blocks on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Code::Blocks's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Code::Blocks on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Code::Blocks on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
These IDEs support multiple languages. There are language focused IDEs IntelliJ Idea for Java, Atom for Web, Codeblocks for C++ and so on. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
I think other editors are either too domain-specific or are too obscure. Source: about 4 years ago
Code::Blocks — Free Fortran & C/C++ IDE. Open Source and runs on Windows,macOS & Linux. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
Code::Blocks, a popular open-source Integrated Development Environment (IDE), primarily caters to developers working with C, C++, and Fortran languages. As a tool within the expansive landscape of software development, it stands among competitors such as Microsoft Visual Studio, Qt Creator, NetBeans, Eclipse, Xcode, IntelliJ IDEA, and Visual Studio Code (VS Code). Through its rich feature set and flexibility, Code::Blocks has garnered varied public opinion, reflecting its strengths and areas for improvement.
One of the most praised aspects of Code::Blocks is its customizability. The IDE’s architecture supports a broad array of plugins, enhancing its capability and allowing developers to tailor the environment to their specific workflow needs. Whether users require additional language support, improved editing capabilities, or other specialized tools, the extensibility of Code::Blocks is a notable asset. This flexibility has positioned it favorably in discussions about the best C++ IDEs, particularly within circles looking for customizable development environments.
The open-source nature of Code::Blocks is another major draw, making it accessible to a wide audience, from students to seasoned professionals. As it supports multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, it aids developers who prefer cross-platform compatibility. The fact that it is freely available also speaks to its inclusion in lists such as "Professional Software Development at Zero Cost," highlighting its value for individuals and small teams looking to minimize expenses without sacrificing functionality.
While Code::Blocks is commended for its comprehensive support of C/C++, some public discourse suggests that it may be considered too domain-specific, particularly when compared to more versatile editors like Visual Studio Code or VSCodium, which supports a broader range of programming languages. For developers working in multiple programming ecosystems or needing a more generalized tool, this may be seen as a limitation.
Within the competitive landscape, Code::Blocks holds its ground due to its simplicity and focused feature set tailored for C/C++. Competitors like Microsoft Visual Studio offer more extensive features but at the cost of increased complexity and resource demands, while environments like VS Code offer broader language support but may require more configuration for C/C++ specialization.
In conclusion, Code::Blocks is revered for its customizability, cost-effectiveness, and cross-platform capabilities. Despite criticisms of being too domain-specific, it has maintained a strong reputation, especially among those whose primary focus is C/C++ development. For developers seeking a straightforward, effective, and customizable IDE tailored to these languages, Code::Blocks remains a compelling choice. As it continues to evolve, it will likely retain its niche appeal, bolstered by the ongoing contributions of its active development community.
Do you know an article comparing Code::Blocks to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Code::Blocks good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Code::Blocks here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
