Table of contents
Expert Contribution
Citizendium encourages contributions from subject-matter experts, providing a platform where users can expect articles to have input from knowledgeable individuals.
Real-Name Policy
The platform requires users to register with their real names, promoting accountability and civil discourse among contributors and editors.
Community Oversight
The community-driven oversight ensures that editors and authors work collaboratively to improve the quality and accuracy of content.
Reliable Sources
Citizendium emphasizes the importance of citing reliable sources, aiming to improve the trustworthiness of the information provided.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Citizendium is good.
Check the traffic stats of Citizendium on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Citizendium on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Citizendium's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Citizendium on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Citizendium on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
> the only conclusion is that the system is flawed. There's a need for a fundamental change in approach There are attempts of creating more "professional" electronic encyclopedia like Citizendium [1] and Scholarpedia [2] but it seems that such tasks are rather hard since Wikipedia solidified its position already, despite flaws [1] - https://en.citizendium.org/ [2] - http://www.scholarpedia.org/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Larry Sanger was more or less evicted from Wikipedia because his viewpoints and personality conflicted with virtually everyone else, which was, as it still is, made of a broad group of people across the globe. He was with Wikipedia for a year and has criticized the project since he left after his salary was cut. His follow up project, Citizendium is dead. Source: about 4 years ago
Sanger hasn't built anything that amounted to anything. He's been involved with a bunch of failed projects like Citizendium, most of which were based on the premise that Wikipedia is broken because 1) it allows anyone to contribute and 2) it's not conservative enough. History has proved him wrong. Source: about 4 years ago
Do you know an article comparing Citizendium to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Citizendium good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Citizendium here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
