Lightweight
W3M is a lightweight browser, making it suitable for systems with minimal resources, and performs well even on older hardware.
Text-based
As a text-based browser, W3M is useful for accessing web content via command-line interfaces, which can be beneficial for users who prefer non-GUI environments.
Fast Performance
Due to its minimalistic design, W3M provides fast browsing experiences, especially when handling simple webpages or when operating over slow connections.
Keyboard Navigation
W3M allows efficient browsing using keyboard shortcuts, which can enhance productivity for users who master these controls.
Inline Image Support
W3M supports the display of inline images when combined with certain terminal emulators, offering better multimedia support compared to some other text-based browsers.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if W3M is good.
Check the traffic stats of W3M on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of W3M on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of W3M's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of W3M on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about W3M on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
I should mention, there are other text-based browsers like w3m and Links, but I enjoy using Lynx most. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
[code]Installed Packages Name : w3m-img Version : 0.5.3 Release : 57.git20220429.fc37 Architecture : x86_64 Size : 32 k Source : w3m-0.5.3-57.git20220429.fc37.src.rpm Repository : @System From repo : fedora Summary : Helper program to display the inline images for w3m URL : http://w3m.sourceforge.net/ License : MIT and UCD Description : w3m-img package... Source: over 3 years ago
You should check w3m http://w3m.sourceforge.net/. Source: about 4 years ago
Try http://w3m.sourceforge.net some day. :). Source: over 4 years ago
Does anyone have a chart/rundown of why we should choose links/lynx/w3m? The old main page calls links / lynx "neighbors"... http://w3m.sourceforge.net/ I use links (gentoo user here), but I do not really see a huge difference between the three. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
Lynx is pretty good, but I personally like w3m. Source: over 4 years ago
w3m is a terminal browser, but it can display images and is sensitive to some style attributes. Source: over 4 years ago
There are things like w3m and Lynx are even able to view web pages in just a text based environment instead of fully rendered webpage. Source: almost 5 years ago
Web browsing, bookmarks: w3m, googler, buku. Source: almost 5 years ago
Ikr? Theres even .. this. Including the stereotypical, plain html text-based page with .. Absolutely nothing else. For whatever reason a lot of "foss" project pages still look like that. Source: about 5 years ago
I like links because it has a -g option for graphical-mode viewing. w3m, however, is extremely configurable, scriptable, and can easily integrate other tools and scripts. As an emacs user, eww is surprisingly nice and highly scriptable (emacs-lisp), etc. Source: over 5 years ago
Do you know an article comparing W3M to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is W3M good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss W3M here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.