TweakThis
A visual website feedback tool: clients point at what should change on their site, and Claude Code or Codex fixes it over MCP, or you fix it by hand.
A visual website feedback tool: clients point at what should change on their site, and Claude Code or Codex fixes it over MCP, or you fix it by hand.
This page is designed to help you find out whether TweakThis is good and if it is the right choice for you.
TweakThis is a visual website feedback tool for anyone who looks after websites, their clients' or their own. You or a client open the TweakThis extension for Chrome or Firefox on the site, point at an element or draw around a region, and write what should change. Nothing is embedded in the site: the extension works on localhost, previews and production.
Every note arrives with what a developer would otherwise have to ask for:
Input values are never read, and the reporter can black out anything before sending.
Claude Code or Codex reads the feedback from the hosted MCP server at https://tweakthis.io/mcp. It claims an item, asks a question when something is unclear, fixes the code in your repository and submits a resolution. You can also read, assign and fix every item by hand in the dashboard. Either way, the fix comes back for review, and the client accepts it or reopens it with a note.
Compare plans at tweakthis.io/pricing, and see how it differs from Marker.io, BugHerd and others at tweakthis.io/compare.
Listed in
Point at any element
Pick an element or draw around a region with the Chrome or Firefox extension, and write what should change. Works on localhost, previews and production, with nothing to embed in the site.
Context for coding agents
Every note carries the page URL, viewport, selector candidates, an HTML excerpt, key computed styles, a page screenshot and an element crop.
Fixed by Claude Code or Codex over MCP
Your agent lists, claims and fetches feedback from the hosted MCP server, asks when something is unclear, fixes the code and submits a resolution for review.
Free reporters for clients
Invite clients with a reporter link. Reporters take no seat, and each client sees only their own sites.
Review and sign-off
Every fix comes back as ready for review. The client accepts it or reopens it with a note.
Redaction before upload
Input values are never read, and the reporter can black out anything in the screenshot before it is sent.
Freelance developers and small studios who look after several client websites and fix them with Claude Code or Codex. Also developers reviewing their own web apps, who want to point at what should change instead of describing it to their agent.
TweakThis is built around one loop: a client points at something on their own site, a coding agent fixes it, and the client signs off. The agent doesn't just read a report. It claims the item so no one else works on it, asks the client a question when something is unclear, and submits a resolution that the client accepts or reopens. Feedback is captured with a Chrome or Firefox extension, so nothing is added to the site, and it works the same on localhost, previews and production.
If your coding agent does the fixing, TweakThis gives it what it needs: the note, the page URL and viewport, selector candidates, an HTML excerpt, computed styles, a page screenshot and an element crop. Claude Code and Codex connect to a hosted MCP server with OAuth. Clients report for free, because reporters take no seat, and each client sees only their own sites. There is a free plan with no card (1 active project, 3 reporters, 20 feedback items a month), and paid plans start at €15 a month.
Coding agents are good at the fix, but they lack what the person saw. Getting feedback to an agent meant describing the page in words, saving screenshots and dragging them into the terminal, and client feedback arrived as emails and calls that lost most of the context on the way. We built TweakThis with TweakThis: the first real item went through the loop on 26 September 2026, when Claude Code fetched a note left on our own dashboard and submitted its fix about ten minutes later. The next four items were on our landing page; each fix was merged as a pull request, and none was reopened.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if TweakThis is good.
Check the traffic stats of TweakThis on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of TweakThis on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of TweakThis's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of TweakThis on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about TweakThis on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Do you know an article comparing TweakThis to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is TweakThis good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss TweakThis here. The primary details have been verified within the last quarter. So they could be considered up to date. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
