Table of contents
Plagiarism Detection
Turnitin provides robust plagiarism detection by comparing submitted work against an extensive database of academic papers, articles, and web content. This helps maintain academic integrity.
Feedback Tools
The platform offers various tools for educators to provide feedback on student assignments, including inline comments, voice comments, and rubric-based assessments.
Integration
Turnitin can be integrated with multiple learning management systems (LMS) like Canvas, Moodle, and Blackboard, streamlining the assignment submission and grading process.
Originality Reports
Students and educators can access detailed originality reports that show the percentage of text that matches other sources, helping to identify potential issues.
Educational Resources
Turnitin provides resources for teaching academic writing and ethical scholarship, helping students improve their writing and research skills.
Overall, Turnitin is considered a good tool for preventing plagiarism and promoting originality in academic writing. However, some users argue that it can occasionally flag content inaccurately or that its heavy use might inhibit genuine writing exploration. Despite these criticisms, its comprehensive database and additional educational tools generally make it a valuable resource in academic settings.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Turnitin is good.
Check the traffic stats of Turnitin on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Turnitin on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Turnitin's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Turnitin on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Turnitin on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
I was a philosophy major and ran arch in college without too many issues. The main thing I needed was a doc/docx compatible word processor for submitting my essays to turnitin.com (though I believe I was simply able to email or turn in a physical copy for a lot of the them) and LibreOffice sufficed for that. Google Docs should also work for this and there shouldn't be any issues using the web version of... Source: almost 2 years ago
This works for most schools and colleges as most teacher's arent given turnitin.com which is way more accurate and is what professors and universities use themselves. As someone who relied on zerogpt for months, It isn't as accurate at detecting as it claims so its probably isnt safe to submit important tasks like this. Source: almost 2 years ago
As a final grade for my english class, we had to create a college personal statement essay and submit it through turnitin.com. I am hoping to submit this personal statement also to my colleges, but im scared im going to get marked for plagerism. Any answers to this? Would really help! Source: about 2 years ago
And how exactly would that work? Schools and colleges use services like turnitin.com all the time to check for plagiarism. I don't think you know what you're talking about. If I was your teacher, I would LOVE to see you try and sue me or make me lose my job. Source: over 2 years ago
The closest one that exists is turnitin.com premium which is close but not really accurate and definitely not free. Source: over 2 years ago
Turnitin, widely recognized as a premier tool in plagiarism detection and educational technology, has become a standard fixture in academic institutions worldwide. Its primary value lies in its ability to assist educators in identifying potentially plagiarized content in student submissions and to foster academic integrity. However, recent discussions and articles in the industry present a more nuanced public opinion of Turnitin, acknowledging both its strengths and limitations.
Turnitin's strengths are primarily attributed to its robust plagiarism detection capabilities, which have been cemented by longstanding partnerships with many educational institutions. Major publications and discussions within the industry consistently recognize Turnitin's effectiveness in comparing student submissions against a vast database of internet sources, academic journals, and previously submitted student papers. This expansive repository of information enables Turnitin to detect everything from direct word-for-word plagiarism to more subtle issues like synonym swapping.
Additionally, Turnitin supports interaction between educators and students. Some educators appreciate Turnitin's ability to facilitate clear communication through its feedback tools, empowering teachers to provide detailed comments and guide students towards improving their work. Moreover, the software simplifies the submission process for students, giving teachers easy access to manage and review assignments within the platform's dashboard.
Despite its prominent role, Turnitin has faced criticisms, particularly regarding its inability to address complex scenarios beyond basic plagiarism detection. Critics argue that while Turnitin is adept at highlighting content duplication, it may not effectively capture more nuanced plagiarism or deeper grammatical issues—a gap that competitors like Scribbr, which emphasize human editing, aim to fill. The human touch in proofreading and editing, as offered by Scribbr, is often highlighted as a significant advantage over Turnitin's largely automated process.
Furthermore, scrutiny has been directed towards the limitations of Turnitin’s detection capabilities when compared to other more diverse services like Grammarly, which offers comprehensive linguistic tools including grammar and vocabulary enhancements, along with plagiarism checks that integrate smoothly with platforms like MS Word and Google Chrome.
Turnitin's impact on the student experience is another focal point in public discourse. Students frequently encounter Turnitin as part of their assignment submission process, spanning scenarios from regular homework submissions to crucial tasks like college personal statements. This integration into academic settings underscores its role as an industry standard, yet it also raises concerns among students about potential issues, such as false positives for plagiarism and the accuracy of submissions through Turnitin's systems.
In conclusion, while Turnitin remains a leader in the field of plagiarism detection and educational tools, offering significant benefits to educators and students alike, the ongoing industry discussions highlight a demand for improvement and diversification of features. Competitors that pivot towards integrating human oversight and broader linguistic tools may provide compelling alternatives for those seeking a more comprehensive approach to educational integrity and content originality.
Do you know an article comparing Turnitin to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Turnitin good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Turnitin here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
