Table of contents
Trix
A rich text editor for everyday writing.
As Trix is an open source project, you can find more
open source alternatives and stats
on LibHunt.
User-friendly interface
Trix offers a simple and clean interface that is easy to navigate for users of various skill levels, making it an accessible tool for content creation.
Rich text features
The editor supports a variety of formatting options, including bold, italic, lists, links, and embedded content, providing flexibility in how text and media are presented.
Embedded multimedia
Users can seamlessly insert images, videos, and other multimedia content directly into the text, enhancing the overall interactivity and engagement of the content.
Cross-browser compatibility
Trix is designed to work consistently across different browsers, ensuring that the editing experience is uniform and reliable no matter what browser is being used.
Simplicity in integration
Integrating Trix into web applications is straightforward with minimal configuration, reducing the time and effort required for setup.
Open-source
As an open-source project, Trix allows developers to contribute to its improvement and adapt the software to fit their specific needs.
Trix is a good choice if you're looking for a lightweight, easy-to-implement text editor that provides the essential features needed for most text editing tasks. However, if you require more advanced functionalities or extensive customization, you might need to consider other alternatives.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Trix is good.
Check the traffic stats of Trix on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Trix on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Trix's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Trix on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Trix on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Itโs actually the opposite, WYSIWYG is better than ever. You just have to seek out the tooling because WYSIWYG isnโt something that everyone benefits from. HyperCard was cool but it had big limitations that made its demise inevitable. It was most useful for prototyping because of those limitations. Its inability to use files over a network is a big limiter. Basically everything HyperCard could do is something the... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
I love how Trix [0] and (I think) ProseMirror [1] work in that regard: it does use contenteditable, but every edit you make is applied to an internal model instead, then the editor state is updated back from the model. [0]: https://trix-editor.org/ [1]: https://prosemirror.net/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
๐ก If you're using the Trix editor, I also show you how to test your view components with a nice helper inspired by Will Olson's article Testing the Trix Editor with Capybara and MiniTest. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Trix is simple and easy to use for basic writing like a blog. Itโs what Basecamp and HEY both use (it was built by 37signals and is the default in Rails) https://trix-editor.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Trix was the winner. It was easy to style, is well maintained, has documentation for embedding it into a form, is easy to create custom keyboard shortcuts for, has great examples on how to save/load content or modify it with javascript. Source: over 2 years ago
In some case, you may need to allow the user to upload the file in the text editor like Trix editor. However, you current configuration not allowed it, you need to configure the CORS. Here the configuration. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
I inspected the text editor and it looks like it's something called Trix. The example on their website has a hyperlink button. No idea how to add links in StoryGraph though, besides the workaround the other user mentioned. Maybe ask Nadia on Instagram or Twitter - she's super responsive! Source: about 3 years ago
I'm sure something like Trix (used in Ruby on Rails) would probably do the job - https://trix-editor.org/. Source: over 3 years ago
For this, you can add a small, isolated component to the page. An example from Rails is the Trix rich text editor: it is a standard web component. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
Yes. Itโs not that hard. There are a lot of HTML Editors based on JS. Such as trix for example https://trix-editor.org. Source: about 4 years ago
Nice to see what I think is a trix[0] editor for the rich text posts. [0] https://trix-editor.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
Trix editor is a rich text editor, i.e a glorified tag that allows to add styles to the text written inside of it. Think of typing applications, such as Google Docs, MS Word, etc. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
Hello everyone ๐ I am trying to use Rails Action Text which based on Trix to implement a posting feature including uploading PDF files. Source: over 4 years ago
Well, there is Trix which uses an internal document model and does not rely on execCommand at all: https://trix-editor.org. Source: almost 5 years ago
Text control (including hyperlinking) is something we definitely want to invest more time into, so super yes to code examples for now, you can copy and paste linked text into the text control, so format the text using something like https://trix-editor.org/ home page - then copy and paste it in can you share more about what you have in mind for diagrams? Drawing them with shapes or detailed diagrams (excel style)... - Source: Hacker News / about 5 years ago
Trix has garnered a mixed to positive reception within the community of web developers and digital content creators, primarily due to its simplicity and usability in basic to moderate content creation. Developed by Basecamp and used as the default rich text editor in Ruby on Rails, Trix is often recognized for its robust integration capabilities and ease of styling, which makes it an attractive choice for developers aiming to incorporate rich text editing functionality into their applications.
Simplicity and Usability: Users appreciate Trix for its straightforwardness and ease of use. It is frequently highlighted as an ideal choice for basic writing tasks, such as blogging, thanks to its minimalistic design that curtails the common complexities found in more feature-heavy rich text editors. This makes it suitable for developers who prioritize functionality without excessive bloat.
Integration with Rails: Trix is praised for its seamless integration with Ruby on Rails, facilitating a more straightforward implementation process for Rails developers. This integration is bolstered by comprehensive documentation and community-contributed resources that provide guidance on embedding the editor into forms, customizing keyboard shortcuts, and managing content through JavaScript.
Modern Development Approach: Trix employs a modern development approach by utilizing content-editable elements while maintaining an internal model. This approach mitigates reliance on deprecated browser commands, thereby ensuring more stable performance and consistency across different web environments.
Limited Functionality: While Trix is praised for its simplicity, this also translates to limited functionality compared to more feature-rich competitors like CKEditor or Quill. Users seeking more extensive customization capabilities and advanced editing features may find Trix lacking in these respects.
File Upload Configuration: Implementing file upload functionalities within Trix requires additional configuration, such as setting up Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS). This necessity can introduce complexities, particularly for developers unfamiliar with server-side configurations.
Community Support and Development: While Trix is well-documented, some developers note the need for more active or extensive community engagement, particularly in troubleshooting edge cases or implementing more complex features. The demand for more detailed examples and responsive support hints at a desire for a more robust community network.
Overall, Trix is considered a reliable and user-friendly choice for developers seeking a basic rich text editor that integrates well with Rails environments. Its simplicity, ease of customization, and modern development practices earn it favor among those valuing straightforward implementation over advanced capabilities. However, for projects requiring extensive functionality or non-standard use cases, developers might find themselves better served by alternative editors with a broader feature set.
Do you know an article comparing Trix to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Trix good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Trix here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
