Kinda exactly this lol. I remember lurking the snopes.com forums 20+ years ago, and I feel like I've been chasing that high since. Source: 10 months ago
For example, we have snopes.com that examines whether something is true or not. Are there private scam investigators that objectively examine whether something is a scam or not? Source: 12 months ago
I fact checked your post at snopes.com and it says 'mixed'. Source: about 1 year ago
I just want to let you know that your snopes.com source states that Kamala Harris was supporting peaceful protests, and that she hate denounced violence. Will you update your post to show that the quote was misleading? Source: about 1 year ago
100% true, fact check confirmed I read it on snopes.com. Source: over 1 year ago
There was a time where he was sharing videos from superspyguy some one told him he shouldnt promote him because a couple women came forward and he was sexually harassing women and was a pedophile. Mikes response was "aaah the internet" and how he doesnt believe things like this unless theyre from snopes.com or other trusted sources because people all get together and ruin reputations all the time, and from his... Source: over 1 year ago
Massive amounts of money is not being "funneled to Ukraine". You do realize that you can go to snopes.com and see what Internet conspiracy theories have been debunked, right? Source: over 1 year ago
Yep! This is high strangeness, not snopes.com. Source: over 1 year ago
How do you know though? Well how do you know? A good place to start is factcheck.org, politifact.com, and snopes.com. Getting your news from Reuters.com and apnews.com is a good bet. Especially since the AP is kinda the default source. And it is what cable news uses for many stories it then spins to fit its own agendas.. Source: over 1 year ago
Actually, that's been debunked. According to snopes.com it is snopes.com. Source: over 1 year ago
Hes said some pretty awful things to people who fancast tom kenny as a classic eggman or do their own voice for a fan work of eggman. Heck he even defended sonic insanity/dillin for being an abusive lolicon saying that victims like to group up and make people look bad and he only believes victims with legal proof like snopes.com? Source: over 1 year ago
Factcheck.org, snopes.com, mediaite, and 538 are all politically partisan organizations that anyone with a brain knows not to trust considering how much propaganda the push. They intentionally false frame stories and disprove narratives that no one stated. They literally inject a ton of false information into the articles and fail to provide actual real context. Source: over 1 year ago
Mostly r/worldnews as a delta hub for everything and then I check the sources individually through mediabiasfactcheck.com and secondary sources. APnews, The Atlantic, BBC, Reuters, NYT, and a couple of German publications such as TAZ or SZ have a good rep when it comes to reporting, but clickbaity titles are everywhere nonetheless. Several political neutral sources drifted off into a more biased reporting style... Source: over 1 year ago
I didn't know this about snopes.com. Source: almost 2 years ago
But something I wanted to write... I like to apply the argument of laziness to situations where my Dad quotes some anonymous source on the internet. I mean, I love the internet, but I don't know what we can do about misinformation. That stuff can make one anxious and depressed, and desiring to feel active, like they have to accomplish something, or they jump out of their skin. Kinda like smoking. I love websites... Source: almost 2 years ago
Found this on snopes.com. There are times when it is an indicator but some variables could give you a false positive. Source: almost 2 years ago
95% of this shit was 'snopes.com' copy/pastes. Source: almost 2 years ago
What are you talking about? I am checking "two hours ago", and there isn't one. Plus, this is coming from snopes.com. Which means it has been fact-checked. You can also listen to it as well. Source: almost 2 years ago
I assert your post is biased because you have made tons of posts in this thread saying that the history.com article is a biased source, when you could have spent 10 seconds searching Google and found hundreds of sources that couldn't all be biased, as well as snopes.com's page about it, which is a website who's entire job is to be unbiased as fark. Source: almost 2 years ago
Is boatos like the Brazilian version of http://snopes.com? Source: almost 2 years ago
Even snopes.com, which is liberal rubbish admits the Obama administration built the cages. Talk about bad faith politics. Physician, heal thyself. Source: almost 2 years ago
Do you know an article comparing Snopes to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
This is an informative page about Snopes. You can review and discuss the product here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.