Table of contents
Skeleton CSS
A Beautiful Boilerplate for Responsive, Mobile-Friendly Development.
As Skeleton CSS is an open source project, you can find more
open source alternatives and stats
on LibHunt.
Lightweight
Skeleton CSS is extremely lightweight, with a file size of just about 400 lines of code, making it quick to load and easy to manage compared to bulkier frameworks.
Simplicity
Its simplicity makes it easy to learn and implement, which is ideal for beginners or for small projects that don't require complex styling.
Responsive Grid
Skeleton CSS includes a responsive grid system, which helps in creating responsive layouts that easily adjust to various screen sizes.
Clean Design
Skeleton offers a clean and minimal design by default, providing a good starting point for further customization without unnecessary bloat.
Promote Skeleton CSS. You can add any of these badges on your website.
Skeleton CSS is a good choice for developers seeking a minimalist framework that provides essential styling without unnecessary complexity. It's particularly beneficial for small projects or when you need to rapidly prototype designs. However, for larger projects with extensive UI component requirements, a more comprehensive framework might be more suitable.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Skeleton CSS is good.
Check the traffic stats of Skeleton CSS on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Skeleton CSS on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Skeleton CSS's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Skeleton CSS on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Skeleton CSS on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
I had been using similar projects such as skeleton[0] and milligram[1] for small experiments such as repfl[2], and wanted to create something similar that I would find aesthetically pleasing and that would fit in as little space as possible. The current version of concrete.css is less than 1kb minzipped! [0] http://getskeleton.com/ [1] https://milligram.io/ [2] https://repfl.ch/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Here's my personal goto: Find some minimal CSS framework. My preference is Skeleton [0] or Bootstrap [1]. The key is just finding something minimal that works without too much fuss. Personally, I rather have a minimal framework provide 'responsiveness' so I don't have to worry about it but I also want it to get out of the way of anything I do. Use JQuery [2]. Don't rely on CSS for animations or interactivity. In... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
I've used http://getskeleton.com/ in the past. I think it's probably just what you're looking for. Source: over 3 years ago
I use an older css library called skeleton. It’s a utility framework that came out before css grid. It has a really nice and easy to use grid system built without css-grid. I had to get rid of the media queries to get it work but it’s been great otherwise! Source: over 3 years ago
I use a minified and customised simple boilerplate / grid system based in skeleton (http://getskeleton.com/). It has no mediaqueries predefined, but the rules for each screen resolution are stated. I start making the website for computer screen formats (large resolutions) and end adapting up the design to phone screens. Source: over 3 years ago
If all you need is a basic grid and typography you might consider Skeleton (http://getskeleton.com/.). - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
I'm not sure what the stats are, but I'm willing to bet that over 50% of websites and webapps started off using a CSS framework. I'm talking about frameworks like Bootstrap, Bulma, Ant, Material UI, Skeleton, and many more. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
I think http://getskeleton.com/ can do this for you if you wanted a really lightweight base to work off. Source: about 4 years ago
There is nothing special here, except I used Skeleton CSS for minimalist styling, you can download it here. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
Think it's a little more than a grid but still very minimal: http://getskeleton.com/. Source: over 4 years ago
Skeleton - not as robust as other mentions here, but the best implementation of this idea of a boilerplate, IMO. Similar to Suzy and BourbonSASS. Source: over 4 years ago
Skeleton is one of the ideal lightest CSS frameworks, which has only about 400 lines of code. Still, it manages the features of the grid, typography, forms, media queries, and many more. You can get started quickly with Skeleton with zero compiling or installation. - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago
The front-end of this app is inspired on this example app that use skeleton css and we will use that framework too. So we will need to serve some static files. - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago
Check out Skeleton for a basic mobile-friendly CSS template. Source: almost 5 years ago
For a basic site, Skeleton is a great simple CSS template that's mobile-friendly. Source: almost 5 years ago
See if you can do anything with this: http://getskeleton.com/. Source: about 5 years ago
When I just want an instant simple site though to display something, I often consider Skeleton. Source: about 5 years ago
Skeleton CSS, a lightweight CSS framework, has garnered diverse opinions in the developer community due to its simplicity and specific use cases. Positioned within the realm of CSS tools and design frameworks, Skeleton encounters competition from more feature-rich alternatives like Bootstrap, Foundation, Tailwind CSS, and Materialize CSS. Public opinion reflects a balanced mix of admiration for its minimalism and acknowledgment of its limitations.
Lightweight and Minimalistic: Skeleton CSS is praised for its lightweight nature, consisting of approximately 400 lines of code. This minimal design philosophy is appreciated for projects that require basic styling without the overhead of more complex frameworks. It is particularly recommended for small and straightforward websites where the emphasis is on functionality rather than extensive design features.
Responsive Grid System: The framework includes a 12-column fluid grid system, similar to more robust options, facilitating responsive web design. This feature allows for mobile-first design strategies, enabling layouts to adapt seamlessly across different device sizes.
Ease of Use: Many developers highlight Skeleton’s minimal learning curve and straightforward implementation. Its simplicity makes it accessible for beginners and a quick prototype tool for experienced developers who need a functional base without delving into intricate styling options.
Fast Development Process: Owing to its simplistic setup, Skeleton allows rapid development, enabling developers to bootstrap small projects or experiments quickly. This trait is favorable for those who prioritize speed in delivering functional prototypes or temporary solutions.
Limited Features and Customization: One of the chief criticisms of Skeleton CSS is its lack of features compared to frameworks like Bootstrap or Tailwind CSS. It offers only essential components such as buttons, forms, and typographic elements, which may not suffice for complex applications requiring extensive UI components and styling options.
Outdated Techniques: Skeleton still employs older layout technologies, such as floats and clear fixes, which present compatibility challenges in modern web environments. Such outdated practices can pose problems for developers seeking to implement modern CSS methodologies.
Maintenance and Security Concerns: The framework has been noted for its lack of active maintenance, raising concerns about its long-term viability, especially regarding security updates and community support. Additionally, the security of its official website has been questioned, which might deter usage among developers prioritizing security and stability.
Skeleton CSS remains relevant in niche scenarios where its strengths in simplicity and lightweight architecture align with project requirements. However, developers must weigh these advantages against its limitations and potential drawbacks. It serves as a suitable choice for projects where resource efficiency is paramount, or as a learning tool for those new to CSS frameworks. Yet, for more feature-rich applications requiring up-to-date practices and community backing, developers might prefer exploring more actively maintained and robust alternatives.
Do you know an article comparing Skeleton CSS to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Skeleton CSS good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Skeleton CSS here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
