Decentralization
Scuttlebutt operates on a peer-to-peer network, meaning there is no central server. This enhances privacy and resilience, as there is no single point of failure.
Offline Accessibility
Users can interact with the network and access data even when they are offline. Changes are synchronized once users connect to the network again.
Privacy
Due to its decentralized nature and end-to-end encryption features, Scuttlebutt provides a higher level of privacy compared to centralized social networks.
Community-centric
Scuttlebutt encourages smaller, community-centric interactions rather than wide-reaching, general-purpose social networking.
Scuttlebutt is considered good for those looking for a more private, decentralized alternative to traditional social media networks. Its commitment to privacy, data ownership, and community-driven development makes it appealing for privacy-conscious users and those interested in technology-driven social projects.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Scuttlebutt is good.
Check the traffic stats of Scuttlebutt on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Scuttlebutt on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Scuttlebutt's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Scuttlebutt on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Scuttlebutt on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
However, one common criticism of the Fediverse, when compared to peer-to-peer networks like Nostr, Scuttlebutt, and WireMin, is that it may eventually "recentralize," similar to how client/server models tend to do. (There're already signs of that with a few instances, but we’re still very far from them to be centers.). Source: over 1 year ago
Use scuttlebutt it's a P2P social media network (no need for servers or a cloud). Source: about 2 years ago
Can you explain why Nostry is (apparently?) your favorite over scuttlebutt? Are the protocols similar? https://scuttlebutt.nz/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
I just found this social network called scuttlebutt: https://scuttlebutt.nz/. Source: over 2 years ago
Signal is an app for secure e2e communication. Maybe https://scuttlebutt.nz/ would be something similar to Reddit. Source: over 2 years ago
I prefer the approach taken by Scuttlebutt[1] and nostr[2], where identity is a public key not tied to any particular server. However Mastodon is gaining a lot more adoption and seems to be good enough in practice. 1. https://scuttlebutt.nz/ 2. https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nostr. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
I love the idea. In terms of numbers and caps, I think going with Dunbar's number of 150 might work best. Cal Newport makes a point about how in the early days of Facebook, it was essentially mirroring your real world social network. In fact, I remember how fun and innocent Facebook was in its early days. Perhaps the biggest shift in Facebook's evolution is towards algorithmic feed optimisation and expansion into... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
That is a feature not a bug its certainly more difficult to censor a poly-centric platform like #Mastodon (or any other service on the #Fediverse). Its part of the beuty of freedom. I could be wrong but it sounds like all of yoru concerns could be addressed that you simply don't understand how federation works. No one can just take it all away, ever. And if you don't want the poly-centric life style, go competely... Source: over 2 years ago
App might have been https://scuttlebutt.nz/ off the grid focused p2p messaging system. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
I'd also recommend looking into anything to do with open source, peer-to-peer networks, end-to-end encryption, federation or platform co-operatives. For example: Matrix, Freenet, Cryptpad, Activity Streams, Mastodon, Aether, Scuttlebutt and Resonate. A whole plethora of services from video conferencing to online marketplaces to crowdfunding platforms to streaming platforms can be built using similar principles and... Source: over 2 years ago
Edit: Scratch that, a more fleshed out and popular protocol that implements this P2P concept is Scuttlebutt: www.http://scuttlebutt.nz/ The most user friendly and refined client I’ve found that implements this protocol is Planetary: https://www.planetary.social/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
This looks pretty interesting. Do you know how it is different from similar systems that use the SSB protocol, like Manyverse for example? Source: over 2 years ago
Scuttlebutt exists. You have complete control over your data. Source: almost 3 years ago
Tools like Scuttlebutt (SSB) might be a good place to build community, not dependent on big social media companies. There is already research there about more distributed computing methods, with social and agricultural systems that are more holistic. Source: almost 3 years ago
RSS, Email, Personal sites, Fediverse, Secure Scuttlebutt are the way out. Source: almost 3 years ago
Git-ssb is really nice for decentralized hosting between friends. Uses Secure Scuttlebutt (https://scuttlebutt.nz/) and I've used it for over a year to collaborate on projects with people over ssb. I'm a bit scared of putting this link here, as the gateway is not super reliable, so I'll ask people who are curious, to get ssb running locally and pull down the data if they want to look into it deeper. But... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
Try [Scuttlebutt](https://scuttlebutt.nz/), which is fully peer to peer. You'll experience the limitations soon enough. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
Check out the decentralized git repo created by the Secure Scuttlebutt folks. Source: about 3 years ago
Scuttlebutt is one such attempt and the best I've seen so far. However user discovery is currently awful and it's extremely hard to get started. Also; using multiple devices doesn't seem to work and I think that needs to be solved before it becomes useful. Maybe some kind of combination between peer to peer and federation could create a very very censorship resistant design. Source: about 3 years ago
If you are looking for social media that supports Tor as a "first-class citizen", I suggest Secure Scuttlebutt. Along with tor support, it is also open source, noncommercial, and fully decentralized/uncensorable. Source: over 3 years ago
"A bulletin board that works on your phone" is actually a decent summary of gossip protocol based p2p systems like Secure Scuttlebutt (https://scuttlebutt.nz). Data can be transferred when devices are in near enough proximity to each other (share a network, bluetooth, whatever). Messages are cryptographically signed (and possibly encrypted) so you could use this as a way of maintaining (albeit slowly)... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Scuttlebutt, known as a decentralized alternative to mainstream social networks like Facebook, has garnered attention for its innovative approach to data ownership and peer-to-peer (P2P) networking. As observed from various discussions and mentions across platforms, the following themes emerge in public opinion regarding Scuttlebutt.
A consistent highlight in discussions is Scuttlebutt’s emphasis on data ownership. Users appreciate that they can literally take their data into their own hands. As noted, a microSD card can comfortably store a couple of years’ worth of updates and interactions, showcasing the minimal storage requirements and personal control over data. This resonates well with those advocating for privacy and data sovereignty, providing a clear distinction from centralized platforms where user data is often stored on remote servers.
Scuttlebutt's fully decentralized model stands out in comparison to centralized alternatives, attracting users interested in avoiding potential censorship and over-reliance on server-based systems. Its P2P model ensures that no single entity controls the network, appealing to users concerned about privacy and autonomy. However, this model also results in challenges, such as difficult user discovery and struggles with multi-device usage, which can impede its growth and user-friendliness.
When compared to other decentralized networks such as Mastodon and Nostr, Scuttlebutt's distinct architecture receives mixed reviews. While some users prefer Scuttlebutt's decentralized, server-less protocol, others find parallels with Nostr’s approach. Thoughts on Mastodon reveal that although it gains broader adoption, some find Scuttlebutt’s model of public keys as identities more appealing for ensuring privacy and sovereignty.
Although many find the principles of Scuttlebutt appealing, some feedback indicates usability hurdles. As observed, getting started can be daunting due to its complex setup and user discovery issues. Those familiar with navigating technical intricacies see potential but acknowledge that for broader mainstream adoption, Scuttlebutt must address these usability barriers.
The versatility of Scuttlebutt as a protocol extends beyond social interactions. Discussions mention its use as a decentralized communication tool, akin to a bulletin board, that works even without continuous internet connectivity. This aspect, combined with its use in decentralized git repositories, highlights Scuttlebutt’s potential not only in social media but also as a tool for resilient communications and collaboration.
Scuttlebutt’s foundation in open-source ethos is attractive to many software enthusiasts and developers. It is often included in discussions alongside other open-source, peer-to-peer technologies, fostering a sense of community among those who prioritize innovation and collaboration in the tech industry.
In sum, public opinion on Scuttlebutt paints it as a compelling, albeit niche, player in the realm of decentralized communication tools. While its principles of data ownership and decentralization are highly praised, broader adoption could be contingent on resolving user experience and scalability issues. The platform’s development trajectory may benefit from continued community engagement and iterative enhancements to make it more accessible to a mainstream audience.
Do you know an article comparing Scuttlebutt to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Scuttlebutt good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Scuttlebutt here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.