Fast and reliable screenshot API built to handle millions of screenshots a month.
Remove ads, trackers, and cookie banners
Proxies
Scrolling and animated screenshots
OpenAI Vision API
Promote ScreenshotOne. You can add any of these badges on your website.
Developers who value their time and want to outsource boring tasks of dealing with screenshot automation to focus on their core business features.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if ScreenshotOne is good.
Check the traffic stats of ScreenshotOne on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of ScreenshotOne on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of ScreenshotOne's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of ScreenshotOne on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about ScreenshotOne on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
I'm working on a project that requires automated website screenshots, and I've hit the cookie banner problem. I initially tried a brute-force approach, cataloging common button classes and text to simulate clicks, but the sheer variety of implementations makes it unmanageable. So many different classes, button texts etc. I've resorted to "https://screenshotone.com", because it takes a perfect screenshot every... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Because I want to assess the modern landscape of technologies that enable screenshot rendering. And I want to rethink some architectural choices I made for ScreenshotOne back at times. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
If you don't want to read the post and want to jump straight away into the code, I open-sourced the Tail Worker code I use for my screenshot API product. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
There's a market for it: https://screenshotone.com/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
I am bootstrapping html rendering API. Is it a good business? What do you think? Source: over 2 years ago
If you don't have time to implement and generate animated screenshots and deal with video streaming infrastructure, you can rely on ScreenshotOne API. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
In case you like building, I advise you to use Puppeteer or satori from Vercel (especially if you use Next.js). But if you want a quick and hassle-free solution, feel free to use ScreenshotOne API, which is ready to render any kind of HTML for your needs. I hope you enjoyed our journey to link previews and how to generate them. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
I didn't set up Puppeteer to take screenshots of the sites but decided to use a screenshot as a service API. It gives a bunch of free screenshots to render websites, so that's enough to play with our project. Because taking screenshots of the site is not a core topic of the post, and using Puppeteer would be a pain in the ass. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
I migrated my screenshot API project to Google Cloud. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
By coincidence 😅 I have recently built a screenshot API recently and can help you to make screenshots. Source: over 3 years ago
Hey, folks 👋 I built screenshot API as a service to take screenshots of any URL with various options: different viewports, caching, custom headers, delays, and so on. Source: over 3 years ago
By the way, I am building screenshot API and, just out of interest, tried to reproduce your idea with a screenshot https://api.screenshotone.com/take?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tradingview.com%2Fsymbols%2FNASDAQ-AAPL%2F. Source: over 3 years ago
Public Opinion Summary on ScreenshotOne
ScreenshotOne, a tool designed for developers to automate the process of capturing website screenshots, has garnered significant attention in technical forums and discussions. The general sentiment towards ScreenshotOne appears positive, with various users highlighting its effectiveness and reliability in capturing high-quality screenshots without the encumbrance of cookie banners, which commonly hinder automated screenshot processes.
A noteworthy point from user feedback is ScreenshotOne's ability to bypass cookie banners seamlessly. This feature stands out, as many developers initially attempt to manually handle cookie banners by cataloging classes and button texts—often a futile endeavor given the diversity of banner implementations. The tool's ability to handle these variations effectively signifies a strong competitive advantage for ScreenshotOne, especially when contrasted with other services that struggle with such intricacies.
Discussions also reveal the openness of ScreenshotOne's development ecosystem. There's a mention of open-sourced components related to ScreenshotOne, indicating a community-driven approach that might attract developer participation. This openness not only supports community engagement but also suggests a commitment to transparency and collaborative improvement—a trait appreciated in technical circles.
Furthermore, ScreenshotOne is positively noted for its ease of integration and versatility. Users have praised it as a preferred choice over manual solutions like Puppeteer for quick, hassle-free screenshots. The readiness to deliver results without requiring extensive setup is cited as a benefit for those seeking expedient solutions to render HTML screenshots, including Open Graph images.
However, while much of the discourse is centered around the tool's superior performance, there's a competitive landscape that ScreenshotOne navigates. It faces direct competition from other players such as Screenshot Machine, Urlbox.io, and ScreenshotAPI.net among others. These competitors also target developers looking for effective screenshot automation solutions, but ScreenshotOne's distinguishing attributes—automatic handling of cookie banners, reliability, and ease of use—emerge as compelling reasons for its preference among developers.
In conclusion, ScreenshotOne holds a favorable position in the realm of developer tools for screenshot automation. Its ability to handle complex scenarios like cookie banners with ease, combined with transparent development practices and versatile service offerings, contributes to its standing as a robust choice for developers. As evidenced by user feedback and comparisons with other products, ScreenshotOne is well-regarded for its efficiency and effectiveness, which are critical qualities for developers dealing with automated website screenshots.
Do you know an article comparing ScreenshotOne to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is ScreenshotOne good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss ScreenshotOne here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
