Comprehensive Information
Reference.com provides a broad range of information across various topics, making it a versatile resource for quick fact-checking and general knowledge.
Search Functionality
The website features a user-friendly search bar that allows users to quickly find information on specific queries without navigating through multiple categories.
Accessible Language
Content on Reference.com is often written in clear and accessible language, making it easy for users of all ages and education levels to understand.
Free Access
Most of the content on Reference.com is available for free, allowing users to access a wealth of information without any subscription or cost barriers.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Reference.com is good.
Check the traffic stats of Reference.com on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Reference.com on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Reference.com's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Reference.com on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Reference.com on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
This wasn't for my team but, I was looking in this comment section for any mention of Billy Butler. Couldn't find any after maybe 2-3 minutes of looking. I remembered him being better than his stats on baseball-reference.com say he is. Maybe that was because I used to play a lot of MLB 2K11 when I was a younger. Source: over 2 years ago
You can use WSJT-X,FLDigi,and other programs with the sdr software,but I'm no help there,as I use ham transcievers for digital. Look on radio https://reference.com for just about anything that you're interested in. It even has a state by state section.along with a database for cities and counties. You can spend a long time on that site,and learn a lot. Source: almost 3 years ago
I think a lot of this depends on the site from where Microsoft culls their answers. For rat, the first that pops up when selecting it says a baby rat is a "kit," but if you search, it changes. Squeaks and nibbles says, "A baby rat is called a kitten or a pup," whereas reference.com says "a baby rat is called a pup.". Source: about 3 years ago
Baseball reference.com shows him at 0 runs on defense, so perfectly average. NOt sure what you're looking at. I suppose statcast? I will have a look there. Source: over 3 years ago
The TOP response (reference.com) says 800f open air to 1500 ideal. Source: over 3 years ago
All stats from basketball reference.com before tonightโs games. Source: over 3 years ago
I just bought a new BCD996p2 on Amazon. I am not a novice scanner user, I am a broadcastify feed provider (4 feeds for over 10 years) I have used scanners for over 50 years. I own 3 BCT15x scanners which are very similar to the 996 but no digital so I figured I would upgrade one. I have programmed the 996 with proscan and downloaded all my channels from radio reference.com. I am using the same roof mounted... Source: almost 4 years ago
I've just been typing stuff in I've seen on the radioreference.com website and the NOAA weather website and all I've been able to get is radio static but thank you for the help ill check out the repeater book. Source: almost 4 years ago
Baseball reference.com says he played left when they put him out there for a batter. Source: almost 4 years ago
Just took the stats from Baseball reference.com. I looked at the splits for 2021. Source: almost 4 years ago
Excluding the shortened 2020 COVID season, Mike Trout's worst season of WAR at baseball reference.com is 7.2. Ramon would get some MVP chatter at 7.2: that is rock bottom WAR for Trout. Not taking anything away from Ramon-I love him. But he isn't Mike Trout-nobody is. Maybe Acuna or Tatis Jr. Can reach that level-it certainly is possible. Nobody throw's Ramon's name around with any of those guys. Source: over 4 years ago
So you're actually mentally disabled then? The first one is an article written by "Staff Writer" for reference.com (whatever the hell that is), which CLAIMS that there's a study in the NEJM proving the lifespan thing. Then they don't link to it or even give concrete figures from the study. Source: over 4 years ago
Hence the criticism of Roman's pass play calls. In other words: we don't know what Boykin would do elsewhere. But if you look up his "per-target" and "per catch" stats, they're better than Smith-Schuster's. Those ratios would surely drop some in a higher volume offense where he's catching little 3 yard hitches and similiar little crap-plays that "high volume" WRs pad their stats with (all of which are... Source: over 4 years ago
Do you know an article comparing Reference.com to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Reference.com good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Reference.com here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.