Table of contents
Purecss
A set of small, responsive CSS modules that you can use in every web project.
As Purecss is an open source project, you can find more
open source alternatives and stats
on LibHunt.
Lightweight
Pure.css is extremely lightweight, under 4KB when minified and gzipped, which makes it very fast to load.
Responsive
Pure.css comes with a set of responsive design modules that can be easily integrated, ensuring that your web pages look good on all devices.
Modular
The library is modular, meaning you can include only the parts that you need, which keeps your project lean.
Easy Integration
Pure.css can be easily dropped into existing projects without much hassle, allowing for quick and effective styling.
Customization
Pure.css is designed to be easily customizable, enabling developers to tweak the styles to fit their project's needs.
CSS Vanilla Approach
Pure.css sticks to a vanilla CSS approach, making it easy for developers who are familiar with standard CSS.
Yes, PureCSS is good, especially for certain use-cases.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Purecss is good.
Check the traffic stats of Purecss on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Purecss on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Purecss's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Purecss on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Purecss on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Purecss - A set of small, responsive CSS modules. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Neat lacks a header and navigation; this by design, and may be enough for simple sites. If you want more capability, Pure.css is good to try too https://purecss.io/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
I found Pure.css and it looks nice but maybe there is something better? Source: about 3 years ago
Some examples: - https://simplecss.org/ - https://purecss.io/ (I've used this one for over a decade and works great). Source: almost 4 years ago
Now, to test our CSP, we just have to load some external resources. Let's bring on Pure.css and Lodash. Update index.ejs to look like this :. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago
Personally I don't like either. Bootstrap seems too bloated and cookie-cutter, and Tailwind is inline styles and clutter. Lately I've used Bulma (CSS framework) and Buefy (Bulma + Vue) on a couple of projects. I also like the look of Pure CSS, but I haven't used it. Source: over 4 years ago
I use https://purecss.io/ all the time. Source: over 4 years ago
Pure.css is one of the best lightweight CSS frameworks. All the modules are packed in at 3.7KB minified and gzipped, equipped with different features. Pure.css is developed keeping mobile devices in mind. If you plan only to use one subset of these modules, you will end up saving even more bytes. - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago
Hi everyone. How can I set up PureCSS with Svelte? I tried using the CDN as mentioned in their website but I guess that's not the way to go here. Source: over 5 years ago
I had to do some research and it came down to Pure CSS, Tailwind CSS, and Milligram, I believe it was. - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago
Public Opinion on Pure.css
Pure.css, developed by Yahoo, stands out in the realm of CSS frameworks for its minimalist design and highly efficient performance, especially for mobile-first applications. As a highly lightweight CSS framework, it is often lauded across various discussions and articles as a viable alternative to more robust CSS frameworks like Bootstrap. Pure.css focuses solely on CSS, without integrating JavaScript components, which appeals to developers favoring minimalism and simplicity.
Size and Performance: One of the most highlighted aspects of Pure.css is its diminutive size. With a footprint of approximately 3.7KB to 4.5KB when minified and gzipped, Pure.css is regarded as one of the smallest frameworks available. This attribute is particularly advantageous for mobile devices where resource efficiency is crucial. Developers appreciate the ability to select only the necessary modules, further optimizing loading times.
Compatibility and Integration: Pure.css works effectively with other libraries, particularly Normalize.css, ensuring consistent rendering across browsers. Its design allows seamless integration with any JavaScript library or framework, providing flexibility in application development.
Ease of Use: Offering basic CSS modules such as grids, menus, and buttons, Pure.css simplifies the development of responsive designs. The framework's straightforward nature is conducive to both beginners and seasoned developers seeking to manage the required styling without the overhead of additional frameworks.
Focus on Mobile: Designed with mobile devices in mind, Pure.css effectively caters to the growing trend of mobile-first development. This design philosophy aligns with current web development practices, making it a preferable choice in scenarios emphasizing responsive design.
Limited Features and Templates: Despite its efficiency, a notable drawback of Pure.css is its limited range of templates and design components compared to feature-rich alternatives like Bootstrap and Tailwind CSS. Developers seeking extensive out-of-the-box components might find Pure.css's offerings inadequate for complex projects.
CSS Only: While the pure CSS approach is a strength in terms of size and simplicity, it may also serve as a limitation for projects needing integrated JavaScript components. This necessitates additional tools or custom coding to achieve dynamic and interactive UI elements.
The technical blogging community generally holds Pure.css in high regard for projects where minimalism and speed are prioritized. Developers often mention it in the context of Bootstrap alternatives, appreciating its efficiency but also acknowledging that it is not as feature-rich. While some developers extol its simplicity for various projects, others prefer frameworks like Tailwind or Materialize when comprehensive styling and component libraries are needed.
The balance Pure.css strikes between function, form, and size has continued to secure its place in the toolkit of developers focused on lightweight and responsive web development. As a testament to its longevity and continued relevance, Pure.css is still actively considered in discussions on CSS frameworks, despite the competitive and ever-evolving nature of web development tools.
Do you know an article comparing Purecss to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Purecss good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Purecss here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
