Tier lists (prefems)
Rank anything with 2 to 12 tiers, using images or plain text. You name the tiers yourself.
Rank anything with 2 to 12 tiers, using images or plain text. You name the tiers yourself.
Other people re-rank your tier list (prefem) their own way, so you can see item by item where they agreed with you and where they did not.
Global Hopinion
Every ranking a subject has ever received, added up into one shared community ranking from S down to F.
Opinion Explorer
A permanent page for every subject, showing the community tier distribution with percentages and vote counts. Two subjects can be compared side by side.
Controversiality score
A 0 to 10 score per subject, so you can tell a settled opinion apart from a split one.
Pros and cons
Short notes written by the community on each subject, voted up or down by everyone else.
Subject library
A shared library of things to rank, or add something nobody has ranked before.
Nests
Communities built around one interest, each with its own tags, standards and moderators.
Feeds
Sort by trending, newest, or only the people, nests and subjects you follow.
Comments
Text, images and GIFs, with replies, mentions and pinned comments.
Drafts
Save a list and finish it later, or send one to someone else to complete.
Levels and reputation
Levels grow with what you post. Reputation reflects how other people vote on it.
Account
Free. Sign in with email, Google or Apple.
Prefems is a free consumer product, so it has communities rather than customers.
Most tier list tools give you an image to post. Prefems gives you the reaction to it.
You publish a ranking, and other people rank the same items their own way. Their version is called a hopinion, and you can see item by item what they moved and how far.
Those rankings do not disappear after the post. Every item you rank is a subject with its own permanent page, and every ranking that subject has ever received is counted there into one shared community ranking. So the question stops being "what does this one person think" and becomes "what do people actually think", with the vote counts behind it.
Other tier list makers are drawing tools. You arrange items, export a picture, and post it somewhere else. The conversation happens off the site, and nothing is kept.
On Prefems the ranking is the start. People answer your list with their own version, the disagreement is shown per item, and every ranking feeds a running total for the item itself. You also get a page per subject with the tier distribution, a 0 to 10 controversiality score, community written pros and cons, and a side by side comparison against any other subject.
It also has the parts a drawing tool has no reason to build: communities with their own rules and moderators, follows, comments, drafts and a feed. It works in the browser and as an app on iOS and Android, and it is free.
People who already rank things and argue about it. Gaming, music, film and TV, football, food, anything with a fandom that likes to debate.
Most of them have made a tier list before, posted the image somewhere, and watched the replies scroll away. They are the ones who care that the disagreement gets counted.
The second group is people who want the answer rather than the argument. They use the Opinion Explorer to look up what a community actually settled on for one thing, and how split that community was.
The site is 16+ and everything public is moderated.
Everyone ranks things. It is one of the oldest ways people talk about what they like, and the tier list made it a format.
The problem was what happened next. You spend an hour on a list, post the image, and get back a pile of comments saying you were wrong. There is no way to see how wrong, which items people actually disagreed on, or what the group as a whole would have said. The opinion is real, and then it is gone.
Prefems was built to keep it. Someone answers your list by ranking the same items themselves, so the disagreement is measured instead of described. Every one of those answers is added to the item's own page, so over time the community builds a ranking for a game or an album that nobody had to write down. The word prefem is short for preferences, because that is all a tier list ever was.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Prefems is good.
Check the traffic stats of Prefems on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Prefems on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Prefems's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Prefems on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Prefems on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Do you know an article comparing Prefems to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Prefems good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Prefems here. The primary details have been verified within the last quarter. So they could be considered up to date. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
