Table of contents
Otter Browser
Web browser controlled by the user, not vice-versa.
As Otter Browser is an open source project, you can find more
open source alternatives and stats
on LibHunt.
Pricing:
- Open Source
Customization
Otter Browser is highly customizable, allowing users to modify the interface and functionality to suit their preferences, making it a good choice for power users who want more control over their browsing experience.
Lightweight
The browser is designed to be lightweight, which means it typically consumes fewer system resources compared to more mainstream browsers, leading to potentially faster performance on older or less powerful hardware.
Privacy-Focused
Otter Browser emphasizes user privacy, providing features and settings that allow users to browse the web with greater anonymity and control over their data.
Open Source
As an open-source project, Otter Browser allows users and developers to inspect the code, contribute to its development, and trust that there are no hidden tracking or data collection methods.
Otter Browser is a solid choice for users looking for a customizable and lightweight browser that balances classic features with modern web compatibility. It's particularly appealing to those who have fond memories of the classic Opera browser or who want more control over their browsing environment.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Otter Browser is good.
Check the traffic stats of Otter Browser on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Otter Browser on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Otter Browser's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Otter Browser on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Otter Browser on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
It took me a bit of searching, but it's nice to know that there are desktop browsers that are not based on Chromium or Gecko, i.e. Webkit [1]. I would like to Otter Browser [2], next time I use my Windows machine. [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/browsers/comments/nkzrj0/comment/gzht47d/ [2] https://otter-browser.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
There are WebKit browsers for Windows: Otter Browser and my Split Browser (alpha). Source: over 3 years ago
Ditch Opera for Otter Browser, which is a spiritual continuation of the classic Opera. Source: over 3 years ago
Proof of concept for split screen and based on qt is long available with the otter browser - you may be interested in the project https://otter-browser.org/. Source: about 4 years ago
Opera GX is overloaded with features, which take more RAM. Use the regular Opera for more lightweight experience. Or Otter Browser for even less RAM. Source: about 4 years ago
There is otterQt WebEngine, it doesn't have a lot of extensions but it does have a proper adblocker and auto cookies cleaner (similar to Cookie AutoDelete on FireFox) , the only problem that I have with this browser is that it feels little bit sluggish on youtube (my workaround for this problem is to download FreeTube) other than that it is a great browser. Source: over 4 years ago
Try https://otter-browser.org itโs chromium based. Source: over 4 years ago
Iridium Browser, Falkon and Otter browser are also Chromium based, decent and Ungoogled. Source: over 4 years ago
Still Otter Browser is made mostly by a single developer and it's not based on Gecko/Blink, but WebKit. Source: over 4 years ago
Beware of Chromium-based browsers, they are memory hog. Use Pale Moon (Goanna), Otter Browser (QtWebKit) or Epiphany (WebKitGTK+), they are really lightweight. Source: over 4 years ago
Opera is safe as much as Google Chrome is. It uses the same web engine Blink. It just sends data to Opera servers in Norway instead of Google. However, it is not open source. If you prefer the look and feel of the classic Opera, try the open source Otter Browser. Source: almost 5 years ago
Opera GX and Brave don't make much substantive change to the underlying Chromium base. If you want something truly different you'll have to look towards Firefox (Gecko) or Otter (WebKit). Source: over 4 years ago
Otter Browser is very lightweight and open source, Dot Browser (based on Firefox), Skye (a fork of Wexond, which is based on Electron) and Midori Browser (based on Blue Hawk, which is a fork of Falkon) are also being developed in the open. Source: almost 5 years ago
Otter Browser is a lightweight web browser which incorporates the classic Opera features. Source: almost 5 years ago
I never tried it on RPi, but there is the Otter Browser: https://otter-browser.org. Source: almost 5 years ago
One of the lightest web browsers in terms of RAM usage are: K-Meleon or Otter Browser (ignoring the old ones such as NetSurf, Dillo or Links). Source: almost 5 years ago
So far, my favorite one is the Otter Browser but I am still a new user: https://otter-browser.org/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 5 years ago
For an open-source recreation of Opera 12, there is Otter: https://otter-browser.org. - Source: Hacker News / about 5 years ago
For true old Opera experience there's Otter. https://otter-browser.org/ But it's being developed by a very small community, and probably can't keep up, haven't tried it in a while. - Source: Hacker News / about 5 years ago
There is Otter Browser, which is open source and provides a sidebar like Opera (press F4). Source: over 5 years ago
Based on various public mentions and discussions, the Otter Browser emerges as a distinctive option in the realm of web browsers, particularly appealing to users seeking alternatives to popular Chromium-based browsers. Inspired by the classic Opera, the Otter Browser's primary ambition is to revive the features and user experience associated with Opera's earlier iterations while implementing modern web technologies. Here is an analytical summary of public opinion:
Otter Browser's charm largely stems from its nostalgic appeal, successfully resonating with users who favor the "classic Opera" experience. Often framed as a spiritual successor, Otter attracts former Opera users who appreciate its interface and functionality reminiscences of the once-popular browser. Its development is noted for being community-driven, with contributions mainly from a small team of developers. This perhaps cultivates a dedicated niche following, despite some users expressing concern over whether the small scale can sustain ongoing feature development and improvements.
A recurring theme in user opinions is Otter Browser's efficiency concerning system resources. Many users applaud its lightweight nature, specifically noting minimal RAM consumption compared to bulkier Chromium and Blink-based browsers like Opera GX, which are criticized for high memory usage. Such characteristics make Otter an attractive option for users operating on hardware with limited resources or seeking a faster browsing experience without sacrificing functionality.
Otter Browser's utilization of the QtWebKit engine sets it apart from the majority of contemporary browsers that typically run on more common engines like Blink or Gecko. This choice makes it a preferred alternative among a subset of users who deliberately seek non-Chromium or non-Gecko options, often out of concern for privacy or desiring a divergence from mainstream tech ecosystems. However, this divergence does come with trade-offsโsome users report that it can feel sluggish, particularly in handling media-rich content like YouTube videos, suggesting occasional performance limitations.
Functionally, Otter receives praise for integrating features that bolster privacy, such as effective ad-blocking and automatic cookie cleaning capabilities. These attributes appeal to privacy-focused users seeking control over their data and browsing footprint. Nevertheless, there are mentions of limited availability of extensions, which might hinder its flexibility for users who are heavily reliant on add-ons available in more extensible browsers such as Firefox.
The discussion surrounding Otter Browser occasionally touches on its development trajectory. The project is perceived as largely driven by a passionate yet small group of developers, and while there is an appreciation for their work, some users express apprehension regarding the project's capacity to keep pace with rapidly evolving web standards and security protocols.
In summary, Otter Browser stands as a compelling choice for users yearning for classic Opera functionality, efficient resource management, and distinct non-Chromium technology. While it excels in certain niches, prospective users should weigh its performance on modern, media-intensive sites and potential limitations in available extensions against their primary needs. As with any software, user experiences can vary, and ongoing community support will be essential in shaping its future landscape.
Do you know an article comparing Otter Browser to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Otter Browser good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Otter Browser here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
