Table of contents
NetBSD
PowerPC, Alpha, SPARC, MIPS, SH3, ARM, amd64, i386, m68k, VAX: Of course it runs NetBSD.
As NetBSD is an open source project, you can find more
open source alternatives and stats
on LibHunt.
Portability
NetBSD is known for its high portability across different hardware platforms. It supports a wide range of architectures, making it a versatile choice for various types of systems.
Clean Design
The operating system is praised for its clean and well-documented codebase, which makes it easier to understand, maintain, and contribute to the development.
Security
NetBSD places a strong emphasis on security, implementing robust security features and frequent updates to maintain a secure environment.
Lightweight
It is designed to be lightweight and efficient, which is beneficial for systems with limited resources, such as embedded devices.
Advanced Networking
NetBSD provides advanced networking capabilities, making it suitable for use in network appliances and services.
The idea of config files is fine, it's the implementation I don't like. I was using NetBSD recently for my senior project and found it fine to use - all the documentation is in one place (well, two - the manpages and netbsd.org). It's when the documentation is nonexistent and you have to search through a million different websites and forum posts to find the one line you have to change - that's what gets me. Linus... Source: over 2 years ago
This is what most of the existing open source operating systems are and it is much easier to contribute to those or fork one that does most of what you want. If you are aiming at a POSIX system then there is a fair amount of work but you at least then get a huge amount of already written software that you can run (IIUC Redox is aiming for this but written in Rust). A structure like Qubes OS would make it easier... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
It looks like one of the vulnerabilities involves being able to sneak in a rogue ICMPv6 route advertisement, with rogue DNS entries. It also mentions doing this kind of stuff against NetBSD 7.1, but that's a couple of versions old, so I guess they were concerned about all the random managed access points floating around? Source: almost 4 years ago
Do you know an article comparing NetBSD to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
This is an informative page about NetBSD. You can review and discuss the product here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
