Extended Markdown Syntax
MyST Markdown extends the standard Markdown syntax with additional features, like the ability to include directives and roles, which allow for more complex and structured documents.
Compatibility with Sphinx
MyST integrates seamlessly with Sphinx, a popular documentation generator, allowing users to leverage Sphinx's powerful features such as cross-references, indexing, and more.
Flexibility
It provides flexibility for users to create richer content by including features like citations, math formulas (via LaTeX), and more nuanced control over document formatting.
Community and Extensions
MyST benefits from a growing community and a variety of extensions, which means users have access to a wealth of additional functionality and community support.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if MyST Markdown is good.
Check the traffic stats of MyST Markdown on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of MyST Markdown on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of MyST Markdown's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of MyST Markdown on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about MyST Markdown on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Only cons: precise typesetting is not harder. But this is less of the problem. I would prefer a content that is friendly to read and is responsive, than a precise typesetting. [1] https://mystmd.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 days ago
I am lazily posting this all over the thread, but do check out MyST Markdown too! https://mystmd.org. We handle footnotes as a structured object. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Feel free to check out MyST Markdown, which very much aims to specify "structured Markdown": https://mystmd.org. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Much (but not all) of what you are looking for exists in the reStructuredText [1] space. Sphinx [2] is an SSG focused on technical writing about software that you may find worth exploring. Also, the scientific text community has been pushing MyST [3] which is an attempt to take some of the best ideas of reStructuredText and reapply them to Markdown-style syntax as a baseline. The MyST tools are a lot more recent... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Do you know an article comparing MyST Markdown to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is MyST Markdown good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss MyST Markdown here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.