Table of contents
Aggregated Scores
Metacritic aggregates scores from multiple critics and users, providing an overall perspective on the quality of a game, movie, or album.
Critic Reviews
It offers a consolidated view of professional critic reviews, making it easy to see the general sentiment among industry experts.
User Reviews
Users can leave their own reviews and scores, adding a diverse range of opinions to the aggregated score.
Easy Comparison
The website allows for direct comparison between critic scores and user scores, providing a well-rounded view of the received media.
Comprehensive Database
Metacritic maintains a large database that includes movies, games, TV shows, and music albums, making it a versatile tool for consumers.
Metacritic is generally considered a valuable resource for those seeking aggregated reviews, as it offers a concise overview of critical reception. The site's scoring system can simplify the decision-making process for users. However, some critics believe that Metacritic's weighted average and lack of transparency in the scoring system might not always accurately reflect the diverse opinions out there.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Metacritic is good.
Check the traffic stats of Metacritic on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Metacritic on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Metacritic's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Metacritic on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Metacritic on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
It's Thursday night. I'm considering going to see 'Five Nights at Freddies' but not if it has bad reviews. I go to metacritic.com and it's not in the first row. Not in any of the rows on this horrendous website design. What the actual fuck? Source: over 2 years ago
Go to metacritic.com and search for highest rated for your platform. With a request that broad that's your best option. Source: about 3 years ago
Go to metacritic.com look at the PS5 and Xbox lists of "best games" do a count of the top 20 for each system and see what system has more games you want to play. Source: over 3 years ago
Metacritic may be what you're looking for. Source: over 3 years ago
I think we should always question corporations and whether something is a fluff piece, but I find metacritic.com's critical review scores to be extremely realistic and helpful. Source: almost 4 years ago
Also go to metacritic.com look up metal gear survive, and read the reviews, this is what I meant, if daisuke wanted to retire, got fired, lost his passion, whatever, that's the direction guilty gear could head in. Source: almost 4 years ago
Therefore, every movie returned by this filter (currently 169) is missing the must-see keyword. I believe every single one can be verified on metacritic.com. Source: about 4 years ago
I actually find Steam's overall 'Negative/Positive' to be pretty accurate, but it requires a large sample size. There's of course going to be the trolls and metacritic.com users who lost their way, but on games over a year old, I've found the overall average to be pretty reliable. Source: about 4 years ago
Make your voices heard and share your opinion on the game on metacritic.com. Source: over 4 years ago
So, instead, what you do is head over to a site like metacritic.com which aggregates reviews from both critics and players from around the internet so you can get a more honest idea of whether the game is good or bad. Here's an example of that in action. CoD: Black Ops 4 has an average review score of 83 out of 100 from 72 critic reviews, and a 4.0 out of 10 from 1734 user ratings. Of course, that's not perfect... Source: over 4 years ago
Metacritic.com is better because they don't do this. RT over inflates scores dramatically. Source: over 4 years ago
On the other hand, the Metascore at metacritic.com has been going up, now at 77. Source: over 4 years ago
It shows the current number of ratings and reviews for Stadia games on the website metacritic.com with data updated regularly. Source: almost 5 years ago
I tried sorting out the best PS2 games of all time on metacritic.com, never found anything I liked other than GTA SA, but you know the thing is I've played GTA SA on PC so much I don't care about it on PS2. It's cool it can run on PS2, but... yeah. Source: about 5 years ago
Metacritic.com you got those kids giving another point of view for any and all games pretty much. Source: about 5 years ago
Battlefield V was hated by many players. metacritic.com shows how the players rated it lower than other BF games. It might be the newest, but that doesn't mean the gameplay is better than older BF games. Source: over 5 years ago
So I have a couple of questions. How do you personally judge the quality of a Python module, especially compared to similiar ones in other programming languages? Also, are there website that rank the quality of a Python module, similar to rottentomatoes.com for movies or metacritic.com for games? I would be quite thankful for a bit of an heads up before installing a new Python module. Source: over 5 years ago
If you want something new, try reelgood.com or metacritic.com to find good stuff. Source: over 5 years ago
Metacritic stands as a prominent player in the realm of entertainment reviews, spanning multiple categories such as movies, TV shows, and video games. Known for its unique methodology, Metacritic differentiates itself from other review aggregation platforms by not merely offering an arithmetic average of reviews but by assigning varying weights to criticsโ inputs based on their credibility and past performance. This approach aims to deliver a nuanced overall score, potentially offering a more balanced perspective on the quality of various forms of media.
Public sentiment around Metacritic is diverse, reflecting both its utility and its challenges. On one hand, many users appreciate its aggregated Metascore, acknowledging the siteโs ability to provide a consolidated view of both critical and user opinions. The service is often recommended as a tool for checking reviews across a variety of media, ranging from video games to films. For consumers considering new purchases, such as gaming consoles or deciding which new game release to download, Metacritic is routinely used to compare titles and scrutinize gameplay quality. This affirms its position as a go-to resource for obtaining a broader perspective on entertainment options.
However, criticisms also surface, particularly around the platform's design and user interface. The critique of the website's design, described as cumbersome and unfriendly, indicates difficulty in accessing desired content quickly and efficiently. Such issues can detract from the user experience, potentially driving users to seek alternatives despite their appreciation for the site's critical aggregation.
Moreover, Metacritic is not immune to the issue of review bombing, where user scores can be manipulated to reflect extreme opinions, either overly positive or negative. This phenomenon can skew perceptions and reduces the reliability of user-generated scores, although the critical reviews often maintain a broader semblance of realism and usefulness. Some users emphasize this discrepancy, suggesting that while the user ratings can occasionally be misleading, the critics' scores still provide substantial value.
In the context of competing platforms like IMDb, Rotten Tomatoes, and Letterboxd, Metacritic holds a distinct place due to its comprehensive scoring system. Although Rotten Tomatoes and other platforms offer similar aggregated scores, Metacritic's weighted score system is often highlighted as a more sophisticated tool for discerning qualitative differences between products.
Overall, Metacritic continues to be a respected resource for dedicated media consumers seeking both critical and crowd-sourced reviews. Yet, it faces ongoing challenges in ensuring a seamless user interface and counteracting external manipulations affecting its review system. Understanding these dynamics can help users maximize their engagement with the platform, leveraging its strengths while being mindful of its weaknesses.
Do you know an article comparing Metacritic to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Metacritic good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Metacritic here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
