Table of contents
Ease of Use
Karate is designed to be user-friendly with a simple syntax, making it easy for testers with minimal programming knowledge to write and execute tests efficiently.
Integration of API and UI Testing
Karate offers the ability to perform both API and UI testing within the same framework, providing a unified approach to comprehensive application testing.
Built-in Assertions
Karate has powerful built-in assertions, which allow testers to easily verify API responses and integrate validations without requiring additional libraries.
Support for Data-Driven Testing
Karate supports data-driven testing, enabling testers to execute test cases with varying data sets easily, enhancing coverage and testing efficiency.
Parallel Execution
The framework supports parallel test execution out of the box, which enhances performance by reducing the time taken to run large test suites.
Promote Karate. You can add any of these badges on your website.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Karate is good.
Check the traffic stats of Karate on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Karate on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Karate's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Karate on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Karate on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
https://github.com/karatelabs/karate It gives you full control of constructing requests and assertions because test scenarios may include arbitrary JavaScript. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
For a few years I've used Cucumber for higher level testing, and only more recently started using Karate. While Cucumber is a great tool, I think Karate really shines in reducing the boilerplate that comes along with step definitions and making it easy to write meaningful tests quickly, especially when it comes to API testing. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
This is why we need better tools which will give benefits for the added complexity. If you need to create both the feature files AND the code, it's just complexity with little benefits. But frameworks like https://github.com/karatelabs/karate are hiding this complexity and remove the code layer entirely. Which, in my view, this is where you need to be in 2023, particularly for API testing. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Congrats on the launch ! I'm the lead dev of [Karate](https://github.com/karatelabs/karate) and the IDE and traditional solutions fall short. I hope Karate's syntax passes your "memory friendly" test :) We get regular feedback is that it is easy to read and even non-programmers can pick it up. One thing I feel we do really well is chaining of HTTP requests. And we have plugins for... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
I recently found a BDD style tool that has native HTTP comprehension, which seems like it hits a similar area in the testing concept space: https://github.com/karatelabs/karate. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
I'm doing something similar but taking the approach of karate framework making it a kitchen sink of e2e testing tools. Love to see another rust based solution! I might open source mine at some point, I've implemented curl + webdriver, I will expand to support other things in my stack like desktop automation. Source: almost 4 years ago
We use karate to test our fully integrated graphql backend. Has Gherkin language support. Source: almost 4 years ago
Karate is a BDD tool for testing APIs. My experience with it is limited but positive. Itโs probably your best option if you want to do BDD. Other then that I used Python and the requests package, ugly but works great, and Newman the Postman command line utility with some JS test code. https://github.com/karatelabs/karate. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
As we are using Karate DSL for API testing, a straightforward choice would be to go with Gatling, as it nicely integrates with Karate DSL, and we can reuse our existing tests for performance testing. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
Karate framework is pretty good for bdd tests and useful for restful services. Https://github.com/karatelabs/karate. Source: almost 5 years ago
Just posted this tutorial for unit testing a GraphQL API with Karate DSL (https://github.com/intuit/karate) - if you're interested in the code for the demo you can check that out here as well (https://github.com/martin-hasura/testing-hasura-api-karate). Source: over 5 years ago
I can offer this - I use Karate (https://github.com/intuit/karate) to perform tests against the REST API in an ordered way, if necessary, such that the running backend (usually in an EC2 instance) can receive those requests in such an order that I can test end-to-end a whole process. The issue may be DB cleanup later (you may want to configure a script to restore a backed up version). Source: over 5 years ago
Karate has emerged as a noteworthy alternative in the competitive landscape of test automation tools, particularly for APIs, web services, and UI testing. Its distinct feature is its Gherkin-based Domain Specific Language (DSL), which simplifies the process of writing tests, even allowing non-programmers to engage with ease. This inclusivity is highly appreciated in professional circles, as it reduces the complexities often associated with test creation and execution.
Public opinion on Karate appears to be generally favorable, highlighting its versatility and efficiency in test automation. It operates by unifying functionalities often split between multiple tools, such as API, browser, and UI testing, thereby providing a comprehensive solution. The tool supports both SOAP and REST APIs, allowing testers to send requests, receive responses, and validate the response data, which is crucial for maintaining robust API operations in any software environment.
Comparison with its competitorsโsuch as Robot Framework, Cucumber, and othersโoften centers on Karate's ability to streamline testing workflows. Users commend the elimination of the boilerplate code required by some of its counterparts, like Cucumber, allowing for faster and more straightforward test scenario development. This reduction in complexity is emphasized in discussions, highlighting that while Cucumber requires writing both feature files and step definitions, Karate integrates these layers, simplifying the process. This factor makes it particularly appealing for teams looking to minimize the learning curve and development time associated with testing.
Moreover, Karate's integration capabilities have also been positively received. Its interoperability with tools like Spring Boot for dependency injection or Gatling for performance testing further extends its utility beyond basic API testing. The feedback is that this flexibility enables teams to leverage their existing tools and frameworks efficiently, ensuring smoother workflows and more consistent testing environments.
The tool's support for chaining HTTP requests, easy readability, and compatibility with popular IDEs like IntelliJ and VS Code bolsters its appeal among developers. These features are frequently mentioned as aspects that improve productivity and make the testing process more intuitive. The open-source nature of the tool, while challenging to maintain, provides a continual influx of community feedback and contributions, which aids in its growth and refinement.
Despite its robust feature set, some users indicate potential areas of improvement or future development needs, especially for more niche use-cases, as seen in tools like Hurl. However, the consensus remains that Karate stands strong among its peers in providing a comprehensive, user-friendly, and effective test automation tool that suits a wide array of testing needs.
In summary, Karate is celebrated for its simplicity, efficiency, and comprehensive testing capabilities. Its strength lies in its ability to deliver a unified testing experience while minimizing complexity, making it a compelling choice for teams seeking to enhance their testing strategies without a steep learning curve.
Do you know an article comparing Karate to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Karate good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Karate here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
