Table of contents
Icinga
Icinga is a fork of Nagios and is backward compatible.
As Icinga is an open source project, you can find more
open source alternatives and stats
on LibHunt.
Scalability
Icinga is highly scalable and can easily handle monitoring for large and complex infrastructures, making it suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises.
Customization
It offers extensive customization options through its modular architecture, allowing users to add or modify functionalities according to their needs.
Open-source
Icinga is open-source software, which means it’s free to use and has strong community support. You can also contribute to its development.
Multi-platform support
Icinga supports multiple operating systems including Linux, Windows, and macOS, providing flexibility in deployment environments.
Advanced monitoring
It offers advanced monitoring capabilities such as performance data collection, notifications, and automated actions.
Extensible
Supports integration with various third-party tools and plugins, enhancing its functionality and allowing for seamless interoperation with other systems.
Robust API
Includes a powerful REST API for managing configurations and retrieving data, which facilitates integration with other applications.
Overall, Icinga is considered a good monitoring solution, particularly for organizations that value customization and the ability to integrate with other tools. Its flexibility and support for various plugins make it a versatile choice for complex IT environments.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Icinga is good.
Check the traffic stats of Icinga on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Icinga on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Icinga's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Icinga on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Icinga on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Two manually updated svg maps on nagvis that integrate with our icinga checks, one for the transport system nodes and one for the routers. Source: over 2 years ago
Might be a bit of an overkill if you just want to check the certificates, but I'm using Icinga (formerly known as Nagios) to keep track of all of the systems - including webpage certificates. Source: over 3 years ago
Some of it can be migrated rather easily to Icinga https://icinga.com/. Icinga forked from Nagios many years ago, they rewrote the engine and have done a nice WebUI. It is able to support e.g. Business branches using "satellites" that act as proxy to the main server/ server cluster. I was one of the two guys doing the setup for a company with multiple branch offices/ factories and during the time I was there it... Source: over 3 years ago
Personally I run https://icinga.com/ (to all my services, including Plex) and it polls every 5sec and after 5 fails in a row it sends me an email. Source: over 3 years ago
Fast forward 12 years and I have Icinga2 collectors in each datacenter using check_by_ssh to run check_systemd, all front-ended by Thruk. The TIG stack is something on my list of things to look into at some point, but with Dynatrace available to do all the fancy application monitoring, there's no rush. Source: about 4 years ago
For alerting for Linux systems, I use Icinga with check_ssh and check_systemd (caveat: distributed primarily on PyPI) with Thruk as the single pane of glass front-end to per-datacenter installations of Icinga. Source: about 4 years ago
Collecting reports from multiple servers can turn into a fairly large to-do. That's why things like Icinga, Sensu, or a bunch of others exist - to continuously monitor and alert for a bunch of machines/services/etc. Source: over 4 years ago
NagVis is a plugin for both Nagios and Icinga. They advertise geographic maps, but you can put building floorplans in it too. We used it with Nagios for years and it worked great. You should be able to add links to your ticketing system, and I expect you could find a way to put exhibit pics in it too. Source: over 4 years ago
Public Opinion and Reception of Icinga
Icinga, an open-source monitoring solution, continues to maintain its prominence in the realm of IT infrastructure and network monitoring tools. Originating as a fork of Nagios in 2009, Icinga set out to enhance the foundational elements of Nagios while incorporating new features and capabilities. Over the years, it has evolved into a scalable, versatile, and robust platform catering to various monitoring needs, especially for enterprise-grade environments. Here's a composite view of how public opinion shapes the understanding and usage of Icinga in contemporary IT setups.
Functionality and Capabilities
Icinga's core offerings include monitoring IT environments' health, measuring network availability, and performance, and providing real-time alerts and comprehensive reporting. Users consistently highlight its adaptability to work with various devices and robust support for specific environments, such as VMware's vSphere. Moreover, the tool stands out for allowing detailed visualization through color-coded graphs and its interactive interface, although a steep learning curve due to text-based configuration is often mentioned.
Scalability and Extensibility
One of Icinga's significant advantages is its scalable architecture, which makes it suitable for monitoring expansive networks across multiple geographic locations. It is praised for its ability to integrate seamlessly with NagVis, enabling visualization through geographic maps or custom layouts like building floorplans. Further, Icinga's API-driven nature and its agility in configuration empower IT professionals to tailor the monitoring tool to specific business needs, including application monitoring and certificate tracking.
Community Support and Documentation
Icinga garners appreciation for its detailed and helpful documentation, which mitigates its complexity and aids new users in overcoming the initial setup challenges. The community-driven aspect fosters innovation and continuous improvement, echoing the collaborative spirit that underscores open-source projects. Community forums and integration with other tools, like Thruk for a unified front-end experience, further augment its appeal among IT specialists.
Comparative Position
In comparison to contemporaries like Zabbix, Datadog, and LibreNMS, Icinga holds a favorable position due to its open-source nature and extensive customization capabilities. While some users occasionally debate between Icinga and more user-friendly alternatives like Monit or Sensu for less complex environments, it remains a top contender for enterprise settings needing comprehensive, flexible monitoring solutions.
Challenges and Considerations
Despite its strengths, Icinga is not without its drawbacks. The need for manual intervention, particularly during initial deployment and configuration, poses challenges for less experienced users. Furthermore, while the open-source structure facilitates agility and customization, it necessitates a commitment to managing updates and handling potential integration issues.
In sum, Icinga's evolution from a Nagios fork to a stand-alone powerhouse in IT monitoring reflects its dedication to addressing the dynamic needs of the industry. Its balance of detailed functionality, scalability, and active community support underpins its enduring relevance and attractiveness as a monitoring solution, particularly in complex enterprise environments. However, potential adopters should weigh Icinga's learning curve against their specific monitoring requirements and available resources.
Do you know an article comparing Icinga to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Icinga good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Icinga here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
