This blog is running on Hugo. It had previously been running on Jekyll. Both these SSGs ship with the ability to create excerpts from your markdown content in 1 line or thereabouts. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
We also take a look into static site generators, covering Astro, Nuxt, Hugo, Gatsby, and Jekyll. We take a detailed look into their usability, performance, and community support. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
In that case, what we need would be closer to a static site generator (like Gatsby, Hugo, Jekyll). But, static site generators aren't the best choice either because we would have to build a lot of documentation-focused functionality (like versioning, search, and code blocks) ourselves. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Hugo is a popular static site generator specifically designed to create websites and documentation lightning-fast. Its minimalist approach, emphasis on speed, and ease of use have made it popular among developers, technical writers, and anybody looking to construct high-quality websites without the complexity of typical CMS platforms. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
As per many other comments, it sounds like a static site generator like Hugo (https://gohugo.io/) or Jekyll (https://jekyllrb.com/), hosted on GitHub Pages (https://pages.github.com/) or GitLab Pages (https://about.gitlab.com/stages-devops-lifecycle/pages/), would be a good match. If you set up GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD to do the build and deploy (see e.g.... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
Create the technical documentation of your project You can use any of the following options: * A wiki, like the ArchWiki that uses MediaWiki * Read the Docs, used by projects like Setuptools. Check Awesome Read the Docs for more examples. * Create a website * Create a blog, like the documentation of Blowfish, a theme for Hugo. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Doing this made me appreciate existing SSGs like Hugo and Next.js even morešš. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
I suggest hugo: https://gohugo.io/ Generates a completely static website from MD (and other formats) files; also handles themes (including a lot of them rendering well on mobile), and different types of content - posts, articles, etc. - depending on the theme. It's open source and, being completely static, cheap as fuck to self host. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
I would suggest looking into static site generators. Some popular examples, which are used myself are: - Hugo: https://gohugo.io/ - Jekyll: https://jekyllrb.com. Source: 4 months ago
I made a one-page theme for Hugo site generator that looks like Jake's resume. You can create resume page, deploy it on GitHub Pages and just print it to pdf file from browser for your needs afterwards. Demo page: https://schebotar.github.io/hugos-resume/ Repository: https://github.com/schebotar/hugos-resume. Source: 5 months ago
I have been using Hugo to build my landing pages so that they are plain html and some jQuery. I'm now building on my product where you can embed a pricing page in your landing page I had a initial idea of just embedding it as an IFrame. But since the browsers are limiting 3rd party cookies, which my product depends on, it does not look like a good option. Source: 5 months ago
The site has been built with the Hugo static site generator since day one. Back in 2017, when I was originally building the site, I was a big fan of Hugo for its flexibility and speed. Hugo, which is built in Go, is known for extremely fast build times (for example, my 1200+ pages generate in about 7 seconds). This wasn't important when I built it, but it has been beneficial as the site grew large. And, while a... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
The large differences in approaches and product features led us to rebuild the documentation for Camunda 8. C7 docs are hosted at docs.camunda.org; the version 8 documentation lives at docs.camunda.io. The two different sites are built with different tooling (Hugo vs Docusaurus). - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
After running my blog with Hugo hosted on Netlify for nearly a decade, I decided to migrate to a custom solution. I think I resisted the urge to rewrite my personal site for long enough and I deserve to have some fun. I am not going to find an excuse. I wanted to do this in Elixir. I wanted to build all the details of a static website from scratch once. It feels empowering to understand everything. And everything... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
For creating a static site I recommend Hugo. In short this is because it is popular, well-supported, fast, and allows you to get up and running quickly with premade templates. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
I use Hugo. Creating templates was admittedly not easy at first. But as soon as you understand it, you can implement a lot with it. Source: 8 months ago
Export content written in Notion to markdown, compatible for [Hugo](https://gohugo.io/) blog. You can use Notion as a CMS in order to author, edit, and manage all your content while leverage the power of Hugo in order to serve the content statically on your blog site. This lets you leverage the best of both worlds - powerful and expressive UX of Notion for authoring along with speed and pre-built feature rich... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Https://gohugo.io/ is what I've used. I find it easier in some ways then Jekyll, but both have advantages. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
After using Hugo on an Arch-based Linux machine for a while, I realized that a clean, up-to-date, and well-maintained Hugo package is missing. I found/used the following existing packages:. Source: 9 months ago
Hugo is a great tool that let you build website fast and easy. It will render a complete static HTML version of your website. This makes it an ideal candidate to host it on a S3 Bucket. You can then use CloudFront to serve the content across the globe. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
Something like Hugo might be of interest to you. Source: 9 months ago
Do you know an article comparing Hugo to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
This is an informative page about Hugo. You can review and discuss the product here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.