
Plain English checks for AI-built apps, with the exact fix for each problem.
A startup from Pakistan, founded by Zohaib Umar Yousaf.
This page is designed to help you find out whether GuardCue is good and if it is the right choice for you.
GuardCue checks apps built with Claude Code, Lovable, Bolt, Cursor or any other AI tool for the problems that cost money, and explains each one in plain English for the person who built it, not for a developer.
What it finds
How it works
Paste your address and get a free check, with no card and no sign up. Every problem comes worst first, with what it could cost you and the proof of how we know. Paid plans add the exact words to paste into the tool you built with, a read of the code behind the app, and weekly checks with alerts. Check again after a fix and GuardCue confirms on your live site that it worked.
Inside your AI tool
Connect GuardCue to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code or Lovable and say "check my app and fix what you find". Your tool gets each problem with its fix, makes the change, and GuardCue checks the live site again.
Our data
In our study of 50 public apps built with AI tools, 18 of the 47 whose code we could read had a secret key in it.
Listed in
Plain English results
Every problem explained for a non developer, worst first, with what it could cost you
Fix to paste
The exact words to paste into Claude Code, Lovable, Bolt, Cursor or any other AI tool
Open database check
Finds tables a stranger can read without signing in, including Supabase
Secret key check
Finds secret keys shipped in the page or in the code
Bill run up check
Finds paid services a stranger can use on your account
Fix confirmed live
Checks the live site again to prove a fix worked
Works inside your AI tool
Connects to Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code and Lovable
Free first check
No card and no sign up
Founders and small teams who built an app with Claude Code, Lovable, Bolt, Cursor, v0, Replit, Base44 or any other AI tool, often without a developer, and want to know it is safe before they launch or take payments. Agencies that build apps this way for clients can use it too.
Most security scanners are written for developers and report in technical terms. GuardCue is written for the person who built the app with an AI tool and cannot read code. Every problem says what it could cost you, how we know, and the exact words to paste into Claude Code, Lovable, Bolt, Cursor or any other AI tool to fix it. Then it checks your live site again to prove the fix worked. It also runs inside those tools, so they can check and fix in one step.
Three reasons. It shows proof, not guesses: when it says a table is open, it read rows from it without signing in. It avoids false alarms: a public product list is called fine, a customer table is called a breach. And it closes the loop: the fix is written for your AI tool, and a second check confirms it on the live site. The first check is free, with no sign up.
GuardCue started in September 2026 at Hexspire, a small software studio. People were launching apps built with AI tools in a weekend, and the same mistakes kept showing up: databases anyone could read, secret keys in the page, paid services anyone could run up. The tools that find these problems were written for developers, so the people most at risk could not use them. We built GuardCue to explain each problem in plain English and hand over the fix. Our first study of 50 public AI-built apps found a secret key in the code of 18 of the 47 we could read.
TypeScript, Node.js and Next.js, with a PostgreSQL database. Claude by Anthropic helps write the plain English explanations, and every finding is confirmed by a fixed, repeatable check before anyone sees it. It also uses open source scanners including Semgrep, Gitleaks, OSV-Scanner and Retire.js.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if GuardCue is good.
Check the traffic stats of GuardCue on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of GuardCue on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of GuardCue's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of GuardCue on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about GuardCue on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Do you know an article comparing GuardCue to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is GuardCue good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss GuardCue here. The primary details have been verified within the last quarter. So they could be considered up to date. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.