Table of contents
Grav
The modern open source flat-file CMS.
As Grav is an open source project, you can find more
open source alternatives and stats
on LibHunt.
A startup from Canada.
A startup from Canada.
Flat-file architecture
Grav is a flat-file CMS, which means it doesn't rely on a database. It stores content in files and folders, making it easy to manage, version control, and requiring less server resources.
Performance
Without a database layer, Grav can deliver faster load times and better performance, especially critical for high traffic websites.
Flexibility and Customization
Grav is highly customizable with a flexible API that allows developers to build and extend functionalities effortlessly.
Ease of Installation and Setup
Grav boasts a simple setup process. You can get started quickly without complex configurations, making it accessible for both developers and non-developers.
Strong Community and Documentation
Grav has an active community that provides robust support. The extensive documentation helps users get through the learning curve quickly.
Security
Flat-file systems like Grav are typically less vulnerable to common database-related security issues like SQL injection attacks.
Themes and Plugins
Grav offers a variety of themes and plugins that enhance its functionality, allowing users to add new features without extensive coding.
Grav is an excellent choice for those who need a fast, flexible, and lightweight CMS without the complexity of a database. It's particularly beneficial for developers who appreciate customizability and control over their project configurations. However, it may not be the best option for non-technical users who require a more traditional CMS experience with extensive support and resources.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Grav is good.
Check the traffic stats of Grav on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Grav on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Grav's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Grav on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Grav on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
I don't even track the clicks, at this point the shortener is just an Apache2 container with a long config file and some shell scripts for me adding new links: https://blog.kronis.dev/blog/sometimes-dropbox-is-just-ftp-building-a-link-shortener Previously it was YOURLS but now it's the simpler setup, the whole reason for me adding it was that Grav (which is otherwise a lovely flat-file CMS) was really bad at... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
For a while flat-file CMSs where all the rage. I've been using Grav for a while, it is based on (markdown) files as well but also has a GUI and a comparatively large community. https://getgrav.org/ "Voted "Best Flat File CMS" in 2017, 2019, 2020 & 2021!" :-). - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
If you're hell-bent on headless, I can personally recommend 11ty (https://www.11ty.dev/) and hugo (https://gohugo.io/). That said, for non-technical admins, you probably want a user interface. For that, Ghost (https://ghost.org/) and Grav (https://getgrav.org/). Or Wordpress! - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
Migrating to SSG is definitely one of the options! I do wonder what other CMSes people do enjoy, though. My blog runs on Grav, a flat file CMS that still allows me to easily keep the content in Git, while also having some dynamic content and search (and optionally an admin UI): https://getgrav.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
> Aether sits in the sweet spot: simple enough for content creators, flexible enough for developers, fast enough for users. A thing that most other developers miss is that non-technical people, like (and especially) content creator,s shy away from a terminal as if it were such a plague. Some of them don't even have the mind concept of a directory tree, from a root drive to nested ones. Therefore, if you have to... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Perhaps "polish" or "a sleek, modern UI" would have been slightly better wording on my part in regards to the look, but otherwise I'm quite happy that I settled on Grav and also the idea of versioning everything in Git, alongside a CI/CD pipeline, instead of one long lived instance on the server. Grav is pretty cool: https://getgrav.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Is there a particular stack you prefer? If JS, maybe consider Astro (for simple blogs)? It has built-in MDX support and deploys in a few seconds. If PHP, maybe https://getgrav.org/? For Go or a prebuilt binary, maybe https://gohugo.io/? - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
There was a whole rash of them a few years back. I'm not sure if any of them took off or what. https://ghost.org/ https://strapi.io/ https://getgrav.org/ https://craftcms.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
But there is a content management system that makes it easier and simpler. And this is especially true for frontend developers. It's Grav CMS. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Good point on the timing, but I really hope Wordpress users aren't migrating to Drupal en masse. Drupal would be a very poor fit for most Wordpress-y sites (simple marketing pages, basic ecommerce, etc.). It's overkill and way too complicated and requires endless maintenance (see my rant in a sibling thread). There are a lot of better, lighter options for people who liked the ease-of-use of Wordpress.... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
- Site meta-data To learn more about GravCMS: https://getgrav.org/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Not mentioned in OP: https://getgrav.org/ I used it for a project once and both me and the client were happy. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Also php driven https://getgrav.org has a webui admin panel which can replace it's CLI admin tool chain. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
I took a more traditional approach, focusing on something that's "good enough", which in my case was a cheap VPS and an install of Grav: https://getgrav.org/ Some optional customization for page templates/fonts/CSS, some CI so I can build and deploy it inside of a Docker container, Matomo for analytics that respect privacy (which I already use elsewhere) and some additional web server configuration to hide... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
I'd check out Grav. https://getgrav.org/. Source: about 3 years ago
Also, there is a CMS called Grav. Both Gravity and Grav use a very similar (but not identical) font for their logo. Source: about 3 years ago
I would use a flat file cms like https://getgrav.org. Source: about 3 years ago
As an alternative to a static site with Hugo you can use grav for dynamic sites. Can't use it with GitHub pages, of course, but it does allow you to add searches and such to your site, while still writing your content in markdown files. Source: over 3 years ago
If not, then it's grav cms which is more than enough for you. Source: over 3 years ago
I moved my personal blog to Grav a couple of years ago: https://pathar.tl/ https://getgrav.org/ There are plugins for WordPress to generate markdown files from your posts and then you can import that into Grav. I self-host this in Docker and find it much more pleasing to actually write things. Statamic is another similar markdown-based CMS that I've been eyeballing. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
Another area of CMS Systems are Flat File System based CMS which I did last time not hear a lot around but there was a lot of noice in the past from Kirby CMS and Grav CMS. Instead of a database they store all there data inside files and I mostly saw more for simpler website build with it where not specific security releated user context based content where used. Source: over 3 years ago
Grav is often characterized as a modern, sleek, and interactive platform, drawing attention for its simplicity, flexibility, and speed. Being a flat-file CMS, it eliminates the complexity of database management, which appeals to developers looking for a lightweight yet feature-rich solution. While Grav is not as widely adopted as industry giants like WordPress, Joomla, or Drupal, those who do use it generally report a positive experience, emphasizing its suitability for content-focused projects and ease of customization.
One of Gravโs standout features is its powerful API, extensive hooks, and flexible Twig templating system, allowing developers to extend functionality and apply custom designs effortlessly. The platform's ecosystem includes over 300 plugins, catering to diverse customization needs, from backend administration to enhanced functionality. Grav also offers "skeletons"โpre-configured packages with sample websitesโto simplify site setup, making it easier for users to get started.
The administration interface is user-friendly, which helps cater to non-technical content creators while remaining robust enough for developers. The presence of a web admin panel sets Grav apart from more developer-centric systems that rely entirely on command-line interfaces. This balance makes it an attractive option for teams comprising both developers and non-technical staff.
Grav's community, though smaller than those of larger CMS platforms, is described as active and supportive. This community aspect contributes to an easier problem-solving process, providing users with resources and guidance when required. Additionally, the combination of markdown files with YAML frontmatter is appreciated by users who prefer content versioning in Git, facilitating seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines.
Given its file-based nature, Grav is positioned as a sound alternative to static site generators like Hugo and Jekyll, offering a dynamic content management experience while still enabling users to work within version control systems. This aligns well with individuals who prefer managing content in a streamlined, efficient fashion without the overhead of a traditional database-driven CMS.
That said, Grav does have its limitations. Installation can be daunting for users unfamiliar with command-line operations or package managers like npm or Composer. This hurdle may deter the less technical audience who may gravitate towards the virtually frictionless installation processes of platforms like WordPress.
In sum, Grav occupies a unique niche within the CMS landscape, appealing to those who prioritize flexibility, speed, and simplicity. While it doesn't match the market reach of larger players, it finds favor among developers and tech-savvy users looking for a performant, customizable, and community-driven content management solution.
Do you know an article comparing Grav to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Grav good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Grav here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
