Table of contents
Open Source
Forgejo is open-source, allowing users to inspect, modify, and contribute to the project, ensuring transparency and community collaboration.
Community-Driven
Being community-driven, Forgejo benefits from a diverse range of contributors and users who provide feedback and enhancements based on real-world use cases.
Git-Based
Based on Git, Forgejo provides familiar version control functionalities, making it easy for those experienced with Git to adopt and use effectively.
Self-Hosting Capabilities
Users can self-host Forgejo, giving them control over their data, ensuring privacy, and tailoring the environment to fit specific organizational needs.
Extensibility
Forgejo supports extensibility through plugins and APIs, enabling customization and integration with other developer tools and services.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Forgejo is good.
Check the traffic stats of Forgejo on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Forgejo on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Forgejo's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Forgejo on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Forgejo on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Forgejo looks really popular right now. I have also heard good things about codeberg. https://forgejo.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 29 days ago
If you have somewhere to host it you can go with https://forgejo.org/ and have control over everything. - Source: Hacker News / 29 days ago
I moved a while back to Forgejo -> https://forgejo.org couldn't be happier. Highly recommended. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
> GitLab is in an incredible position to moonshot the next generation of software. I don't think they offer anything unique. Forgejo[1] offers a similar platform. [1] https://forgejo.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
What would you suggest as an alternative? Gitlab really sucks in my personal opinion, but what are your experiences with: Gogs https://gogs.io/ (this IS gitea btw) Forgejo https://forgejo.org/ Self hosted or cloud hosted. Also excluding Github because, please just fracking don't. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
I run a selfโhosted Forgejo instance on my NAS with a runner. Not because GitHub or GitLab are bad โ theyโre great โ but because I know myself. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Self-hosting with open source code: - SourceHut: https://sr.ht/~sircmpwn/sourcehut/ - Forgejo (used by Codeberg, etc.): https://forgejo.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Forgejo is a self-hosted git forge. It forked from Gitea in 2022 when Gitea moved to a for-profit company structure (yes, this is the kind of detail that matters once you've started caring about who owns your tools). It runs in a single container with SQLite. No PostgreSQL cluster, no Redis, no microservices. It speaks the git protocol natively, no web-layer abstraction. If you cloned a repo from Forgejo, you... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
For low-resource usage, Forgejo has a good reputation: https://forgejo.org ie you can run it effectively on even a Raspberry Pi Remember to ensure you have proper backups regardless of whatever you decide to host it on. :). - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Regarding Forgejo [0] there are a number of other open providers listed on the delightful forgejo [1] curated list. In addition there is a Professional services repository [2] where services are listed in the issue tracker. [0] https://forgejo.org [1] https://delightful.coding.social/delightful-forgejo/#public-instances [2] https://codeberg.org/forgejo/professional-services/issues. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
This is gitea's homepage: https://about.gitea.com/ This is forgejo's homepage: https://forgejo.org/ --- The homepages should tell you which is more focused on the self-hosted open source use case. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
People like this CHOSE to use github despite it being a walled garden and now are complaining that they want to destroy the "open source" ecosystem. You see, here's Stallman being right once again. Stallman many times on many topics said he wouldn't use a product that's a walled garden and where his present would contribute to that products dominance (i.e. Network effects - everybody has to use it because... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
Gitlab is a platform similar to Github, I call it software forge, the term is taken from Forgejo. Other than managing Git repositories Gitlab comes with a handful of features like:. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
Forgejo is a community fork of Gitea, born out of disagreements with the for-profit direction Gitea was taking, and concerns over moving to a GitLab-like "open core" model. On the whole, both still offer very similar functionality, but Forgejo development appears to be progressing faster and offers lots of minor improvements, and would be the choice I'd tend towards. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
Time to get off for good. We're moving to https://forgejo.org/. With downtime and this, screw them. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Per-minute pricing for self-hosted runners seems like a very fast way for them to force everyone who actually is using self-hosted runners to migrate away. I suspect we'll be doing that sometime in January or February. I guess forgejo is the easiest migration path? https://forgejo.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
I'm writing this article to quickly show you how-to self-host Forgejo, the Git software forge, And how to do common maintenance operations. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
Just migrate to Forgejo/Codeberg[1][2] or SourceHut[3]. Both are like a light speed compared to GitHub and GitLab. [1] https://forgejo.org [2] https://codeberg.org [3] https://sourcehut.org. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
[Forgejo](https://forgejo.org/). Documentation will be updated to reflect the. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
It all depends on interest from the developer community. Many devs are rooting for forge federation for years and are waiting for it to happen. Both Forgejo [0] and ForgeFed [1] are fully community-driven free software efforts, and things go as fast as there are people stepping up to do the work. The ActivityPub-related [2] epic at Gitlab [3], which I also linked in another comment, is another example. It is a... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
Forgejo [1] works well for me. It can be self-hosted, otherwise e.g Codeberg [2] runs a good instance [2] [1] https://forgejo.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
Do you know an article comparing Forgejo to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Forgejo good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Forgejo here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
