FileFeedback is a collaborative review and approval platform for creative and production teams who need fast, structured feedback on PDFs, images, and videos.
Instead of scattering comments across email threads, Slack messages, and marked-up screenshots, teams and their clients leave pinpoint comments directly on the file โ click anywhere on a PDF page or image to drop a comment, or pause a video at the exact timestamp that needs a note. Every comment lives in context, so nothing gets lost in translation.
Key features Multi-format review โ PDFs, images, and video all supported in one tool, with timestamp-linked comments for video and x/y-pinpoint comments for static files Threaded discussions โ replies and /todo slash commands turn feedback into trackable action items without leaving the review Guest reviews, no account required โ invite clients or external reviewers via a secure link; they can comment without signing up Public share links โ share a single file or a curated portfolio of work with a client-facing gallery view Approval workflow โ lock threads once a revision is approved, tag and archive assets, and track status (in review / approved) across a gallery-first dashboard Team & role management โ organization-based multi-tenancy with Owner/Admin/Member/Watcher roles and granular per-thread access control White-label branding (Agency plan) โ custom logo and brand colors for client-facing review links Kanban pipeline view โ track files through review stages alongside the standard gallery view Who it's for Video editors, designers, agencies, marketing teams, and production companies who need a faster client approval loop than email โ and want a single source of truth for "what feedback did we actually get on version 3?"
Pricing Free tier (2 members, 2GB storage) up through paid plans with more storage and team seats, plus an Agency tier for white-label client-facing reviews.
A startup from the United Kingdom.
Pinpoint Video Comments
Click anywhere on a video to drop a pin and leave precise, location-specific feedback. Comments are anchored to exact coordinates so reviewers know exactly what you mean.
Multi-Media Threaded Replies
Reply to any comment to keep discussions focused. Nested threads keep conversations organized without clutter.
Comment Status Tracking
Mark comments as Open, Resolved, or Won't Fix. Track review progress at a glance and close the loop on every piece of feedback.
File Versioning
Upload new revisions of any file without losing the original. Switch between versions to compare changes and track feedback across iterations.
Public Share Links
Generate a shareable link for any file review. Anyone with the link can view the file and leave comments โ no account required.
Personalised Guest Email Invites
Invite external clients or reviewers by email. They receive a unique link to access the file and leave feedback without creating an account.
Granular Permissions
Assign roles (Author, Collaborator, Viewer, Watcher) at the file level. Control who can comment, view, or be notified per review session.
Organization-Wide Sharing
Share files with your entire organization in one click, with role-based controls for who can interact with the content.
Multi-Tenant Organizations
Every organization gets a fully isolated workspace. Invite your team, set roles, and keep client work completely separate.
Team Roles
Assign Owner, Admin, Member, or Watcher roles to team members. Roles determine what actions each person can take across the workspace.
User Groups
Create groups of team members and assign group-level access to files. Manage permissions for entire teams at once.
Inline To-Do Creation
Create tasks directly from comments using the /todo slash command. Link action items to specific feedback without switching tools.
Task Assignment & Priority
Assign tasks to team members and set priority levels (Urgent, Medium, Low). Keep everyone accountable with clear ownership.
Task Status Tracking
Track tasks through Open, In Progress, Completed, and Cancelled states. Get a clear picture of what's done and what's pending.
Task Watchers
Team members can watch tasks they care about and receive updates as status changes.
White-Label Branding
Upload your company logo and replace FileFeedback branding throughout the client-facing experience. You can even use your own custom subdomain to create a seamless integration with your agency website.
FileFeedback is the only review tool that handles every creative format โ PDFs, images, videos, and live website snapshots โ in a single workspace with format-native feedback. Comments are pinned to exact pixel coordinates on images, specific timecodes on video, and individual pages on PDFs. Clients can leave feedback without creating an account, and agencies can present finished work as branded portfolios with a public share link. Everything from feedback to task creation to client approval lives in one place, with no switching between tools.
FileFeedback is built for the full feedback loop, not just annotation. Where most tools stop at commenting, FileFeedback converts feedback directly into tasks, tracks them through to completion, and lets you lock a file once it's approved โ so nothing gets re-opened. Guest access requires no account, which removes the biggest friction point in getting clients to actually respond. The white-label plan lets agencies present it as their own client portal. And at $12/month for a full team, the pricing is a fraction of tools like Frame.io or Filestage.
Creative and marketing agencies, freelance designers and video editors, and in-house creative teams who regularly need structured feedback from clients or stakeholders on visual assets. Typically 2โ20 person teams who are tired of chasing feedback through email threads and need a professional, client-friendly way to collect and act on it.
It started with an email that read: "Can you move the thing on the left a bit? And the colors feel a bit off and flat."
That was the feedback. No screenshot. No annotation. No indication of which "thing," which "left," or which shade of which color. Just a vague paragraph that could mean a dozen different things โ and a client waiting on the other end expecting changes by end of day.
After years working in creative, I'd grown used to this. The back-and-forth. The "can you jump on a quick call?" that turns into 45 minutes of screen-sharing. The email chains with subjects like "Re: Re: Re: Finalv3ACTUALFINAL." The revision requests that only make sense once you've already built the wrong thing.
The real problem wasn't that clients were difficult. It was that they're not creatives. They don't think in pixels, timecodes, or font weights. They know what feels wrong when they see it โ they just don't have the vocabulary to tell you. So they approximate. They gesture. And you spend half your day trying to decode what they actually meant.
I tried every tool I could find. Some were built for designers talking to other designers. Some required clients to create accounts just to leave a comment โ and half of them never bothered. Some worked fine for images but fell apart with video. None of them handled the full loop: feedback in, task created, revision uploaded, approved, done.
So I built FileFeedback to fix my own problem. The core idea was simple: let anyone โ even someone with no design vocabulary โ point at exactly what they mean. Click the image, drop a pin, leave a note. Scrub the video to 0:42, click, done. No jargon required. No account needed for the client.
What started as a tool I built for myself turned into something my team couldn't imagine working without. And once I saw how much time it gave back โ fewer calls, fewer misread emails, fewer "wait, which version is this?" moments โ I knew other creative teams had the same problem.
FileFeedback exists because the feedback loop was broken, and the people suffering most were the ones trying hardest to do good work.
Next.js (React), TypeScript, PostgreSQL with Prisma ORM, Redis with BullMQ for background jobs, AWS S3 for file storage, Clerk for authentication, Stripe for billing, and Postmark / AWS SES for transactional email. Hosted on AWS Amplify.
FileFeedback appears to be a niche tool designed to help teams and creators collect structured feedback on files (documents, designs, videos, etc.) rather than a mainstream, widely-reviewed product. Based on its stated purpose, it can be a good fit for streamlined feedback collection, though it lacks the broad market validation and long track record of larger established tools.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if FileFeedback is good.
Check the traffic stats of FileFeedback on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of FileFeedback on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of FileFeedback's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of FileFeedback on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about FileFeedback on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Do you know an article comparing FileFeedback to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is FileFeedback good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss FileFeedback here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.