Table of contents
Decap CMS
Open source content management for your Git workflow.
As Decap CMS is an open source project, you can find more
open source alternatives and stats
on LibHunt.
Pricing:
- Open Source
Easy to Use
Decap CMS provides a user-friendly interface making it accessible for non-technical users to manage content effectively without needing extensive technical knowledge.
Git-Based Workflow
Content management is directly integrated with Git, allowing for streamlined version control, collaboration, and deployment workflows that are familiar to developers.
Static Site Generators Compatible
Decap CMS is designed to work seamlessly with static site generators like Jekyll, Hugo, and Gatsby, enabling the creation of fast and secure static websites.
Free and Open Source
As an open-source tool, it is free to use, and the community can contribute to its development, ensuring continuous improvement and adaptation to new needs.
Customizable
Decap CMS offers a high level of customization, allowing developers to adapt the CMS to fit specific project requirements, from UI to content structure.
Ease of Use
Netlify CMS is designed to be user-friendly, providing a simple interface for content editors. It allows non-technical users to manage content without needing to understand complex coding or technical details.
Git Integration
Being Git-based, Netlify CMS integrates seamlessly with Git repositories, allowing you to manage content in a version-controlled manner. This makes tracking changes and collaboration among multiple content editors straightforward.
Static Site Support
Netlify CMS is particularly well-suited for static site generators like Jekyll, Hugo, and Gatsby. It complements the JAMstack architecture, enabling consistent workflows from development to deployment.
Open Source
As an open-source project, Netlify CMS benefits from community contributions and transparency. Users can inspect the source code, contribute new features, or fork the repository to create bespoke solutions.
Built-in Previews
Offers real-time preview capabilities, enabling content editors to see exactly how their content will appear on the live site as they are editing it. This reduces the likelihood of formatting errors and enhances content quality.
Deploy Hooks
Integrates well with Netlify's deployment hooks, allowing for smooth continuous deployment processes. Changes in the CMS can trigger automatic rebuilds and deployments of the site.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if Decap CMS is good.
Check the traffic stats of Decap CMS on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of Decap CMS on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of Decap CMS's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of Decap CMS on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about Decap CMS on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Is it similar to battle tested DecapCMS? https://decapcms.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
Not easily without additional tooling. Hugo has no admin panel โ content is Markdown files in a Git repository. You can add a headless CMS like Decap CMS, Tina, or Forestry to provide a web-based editor backed by Git. This adds complexity but makes Hugo accessible to non-developers. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
I used this opportunity to explore Decap, which is a git-based CMS that I wanted to try for some time but never took the time to explore. Some years ago I discovered the project while I was thinking in doing something similar. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
There are at least a few CMS editors for static sites intended for non-technical/less-technical users. They often still require someone technical to setup (config files and OAuth connections to GitHub, for example) but then provide an experience somewhat like what one would expect from the WordPress Admin Page. Two examples I've briefly worked with: Decap CMS (formerly Netlify CMS): https://decapcms.org/ Lume CMS:... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Iโm building my personal blog with 11ty and Decap[0], previously known as Netlify CMS, to manage content. Basically it provides a UI and all changes are pushed to GitHub which will launch the release process back in Netlify. Seems it might fit your requirements too. 0. https://decapcms.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
Big fan of DecapCMS if you get tired of only writing from VScode or w/e. https://decapcms.org/ Shameless plug for my AI blog run on Hugo -- https://reticulated.net/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Thankfully, there are many Git-based CMS such as Decap CMS, TinaCMS, or Crafter CMS. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
There are CMSes that work with static site generators. Static site generators do not imply that the input is markdown, though this is often the usecase. https://decapcms.org/ https://getkirby.com/ https://tina.io/ https://statamic.com/ ect ect. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
There were many ways for doing this (thanks to redditors!). One of the best was generating static website and utilizing a CMS that allows github syncing. I went for 11ty (Eleventy) + Decap CMS (formerly Netlify CMS) + Netlify Identity and I was able build something like this within couple of days:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Its inconvenient to have to sit in front of a computer and open a text editor to write a blog post every time. A common solution is to use a CMS (Content Management System). I used to use Decap CMS (formally Netlify CMS), but it wasnt very convenient for connecting to a GitHub repo, and it didnt generate a blank line between YAML frontmatter and the body, which sometimes caused issues. So this time, I used Tina... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Seems that the target audience for this are non-technical people? Since I am a developer I am more interested in a CMS tool like https://decapcms.org/ that is open source and I can integrate within my app. Perhaps it'd be useful to you to check it out! - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Looks like there was a pull request merged about 8 months ago https://github.com/netlify/netlify-cms, otherwise it's been like two years. I found a post about it on netlify at one point too, where netlify basically just washed their hands of it. Shame. I REALLY loved it's simplicity and git based approach but I can't have clients using a CMS that works that way with no hope of fixes. I'm still trying to find... Source: over 3 years ago
You may give editors a friendly UI and simple workflows with the help of the open source content management system Netlify CMS for your Git workflow. It may be used with any static site generator to produce web projects that are quicker and more adaptable. Besides, it also helps in multi-channel publishing and handling content updates inside Git. It is designed as a one-page React application; thus, you can create... - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
Here are a few that are in the ball park, but mostly lacking the form bit (you have to make your own though most of these offer a way to have a append-only user for the form to act as): - Strapi (https://github.com/strapi/strapi) - Directus (https://github.com/directus/directus) - React Admin (https://github.com/marmelab/react-admin) - Netlify CMS - a bit off the mark but maybe worth considering... - Source: Hacker News / over 5 years ago
Decap CMS, formerly known as Netlify CMS, holds a reputable position within the ecosystem of Git-based content management systems. Often celebrated for its open-source nature and flexibility, Decap CMS is commonly utilized by developers seeking an accessible and efficient way to integrate content management into static site generators like Hugo and 11ty. Through a synthesis of recent posts and product mentions, we can draw several insights into the public's perception and experiences with Decap CMS.
Integration and Flexibility: Decap CMS is frequently praised for its seamless integration capabilities, particularly with static site generators. Users appreciate its capacity to synchronize changes via GitHub, making it an ideal solution for developing static websites with minimal hosting costs. This seamless Git-based workflow empowers users to manage content without the need for extensive technical overhead, a feature underscored by the mention of its compatibility with hosting solutions like Netlify and Cloudflare.
Developer-Friendly: For those with a technical background, Decap CMS is especially appealing due to its open-source nature. It provides developers with the opportunity to modify and integrate the CMS within their apps, tailoring it to specific needs and project specifications. This aspect is particularly valuable for developers who wish to maintain control over their websiteโs backend configuration and deployment.
Community and Resources: As an open-source project, Decap CMS benefits from a robust community. The support and resources available from other users play a significant role in aiding both new and experienced developers to overcome potential hurdles and optimize their deployment of the CMS effectively.
Usability Issues: Despite its advantages, Decap CMS is not without criticism. Users have noted certain usability issues, particularly in scenarios where convenience and straightforward integration are paramount. For instance, while the CMS is suited for developers, non-technical users might find the setup and collaboration processes challenging. Additionally, some users reported that initial configuration, such as connecting to GitHub repositories, can be cumbersome.
Static Site Limitations: Though Decap CMS excels in static site applications, some users feel constrained by its reliance on static site generators, which may not accommodate dynamic features needed for more complex sites or applications.
Minor Technical Shortcomings: There are minor technical criticisms, such as the need for more intuitive formatting, including automatic spacing issues between YAML frontmatter and the content body, which have driven some users towards alternatives like Tina CMS.
In conclusion, Decap CMS garners a generally positive reception for developers seeking a customizable and efficient CMS compatible with static websites. While some usability complications and technical limitations exist, its open-source foundation and strong community support continue to make it a viable choice for developers focused on cost-effective and flexible content management solutions.
Do you know an article comparing Decap CMS to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is Decap CMS good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss Decap CMS here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
