zrok VS StackPicks.dev
Compare zrok VS StackPicks.dev and see what are their differences
Generate professional standard operating procedures in minutes. AI-powered SOP creation built on 10,000+ industry procedures.
featured
zrok
ngrok
Pinggy.io
localhost.run
LocaltoNet
LocalXpose
Pagekite
sish
StackPicks.dev
Composio.dev
Pipedream
Autocode
Dexter
ifttt
Stackcodify
StackHive
Curated directory of 165+ open-source dev tools with honest curator takes, plus StackPicks Connect โ a unified MCP gateway connecting 800+ apps (GitHub, Gmail, Slack, Meta Adsโฆ) to Claude and Cursor through one OAuth link. โน99/$2.99 lifetime, no subscription.
StackPicks.devStackPicks.dev's answer:
Indie developers and AI builders Solo founders and small startup teams Affiliate marketers connecting ad platforms to Claude (For that last one โ if a field requires real company names, just leave it empty. Never invent customers; SaaSHub and AI crawlers penalize fabricated claims, and it can bite you later. "Early-stage, used by indie builders" is the honest + safe answer.)
StackPicks.dev's answer:
StackPicks combines two things nobody else bundles: a curated directory of 165+ open-source dev tools with honest "use this / skip this" takes, AND a unified MCP gateway that connects 800+ apps to AI agents through one OAuth link. Most directories just list star counts; most MCP tools are developer-only and bill per call. StackPicks gives you both โ opinionated curation plus consumer-grade Claude integration โ for a one-time $2.99 lifetime fee, no subscription.
StackPicks.dev's answer:
Composio and Pipedream are powerful but built for developers and priced per usage. StackPicks Connect is consumer-grade: paste one URL into Claude, log in through your browser, and every connected app works โ no API keys, no per-call billing. It's bundled into a one-time lifetime plan instead of a meter. For solo builders, indie hackers, and small teams who just want their AI agent to use their apps, it's the simplest and cheapest path.
StackPicks.dev's answer:
Solo developers, indie hackers, AI builders, and small startup teams โ people who use Claude, Cursor, or ChatGPT daily and want their AI agent to actually do things across GitHub, Gmail, Slack, Notion, and their ad platforms. Also marketers and growth folks who want to pull ad-platform data (Meta Ads, Google Ads) into Claude. India-first pricing via Razorpay, but used globally.
StackPicks.dev's answer:
StackPicks started as a curated directory of open-source dev tools โ the differentiator being honest curator takes instead of raw GitHub star counts. As MCP (Model Context Protocol) took off in 2025-26, it became clear that connecting apps to AI agents was painful: one MCP server per app, a wall of config, API keys everywhere. So we built StackPicks Connect โ a unified gateway that connects 800+ apps to Claude and Cursor through a single OAuth link. Built solo by Piyush Jangir.
StackPicks.dev's answer:
Next.js 15 (App Router), TypeScript, Supabase (Postgres + Auth), Razorpay for payments, Nango for OAuth, and the Model Context Protocol (MCP) for the AI-agent gateway. Hosted on Railway.
Based on our record, zrok seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 82 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Take a look at Zrok it might be what you want: https://zrok.io. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
Regarding peer to peer VPNs: I want to access homeservers and LAN videogames. I was testing zrok [1] until they went paid, then I went to ongoing experiments with Lanemu [2] (a bittorrent-based P2P VPN) and Anywhere Lan (AWL) [3]. So far, the best is AWL - it actually works, peer discovery is fast, and it gives you mDNS-style domains for connected machines. I wish the peer discovery in Lanemu worked better, as it... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
How does this compare to zrok (https://zrok.io/)? Looking forward to experimenting, though I'm a little worried as it sounds like it's not private by default. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Thanks for the feedback, tons in there. - Agreed. OpenZiti is not trying to focus on indie hosts. It has the goal to completely transform how networking and connectivity are done, to make secure by default and a simple user experience the de facto standard. - Our path to do this definitely depends on monetising enterprise rather than indiehosters. That said, you can build abstractions on OpenZiti, which are much... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
For replacing port forwarding, OpenZiti definitely works. zrok, which is built on top of OpenZiti, could also be a great option for sharing resources - https://zrok.io/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.
Composio.dev - Make Agents Actually Useful!
Pinggy.io - Public URLs for localhost without downloading any binary
Pipedream - Integration platform for developers
localhost.run - Instantly share your localhost environment!
Autocode - Build app-to-app API workflows with automatic codegen