
Invision
Axure
Balsamiq
Proto.io
Flinto
Webflow
Moqups
Collaboration app for UI designers & frontend developers

Formspree.io
Basin
Netlify
Formcarry
StaticForms.dev
Paperform
Form backend for static sites. Point your form action at a URL and read submissions in an inbox.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Zeplin seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 23 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | zeplin.io | catchform.dev |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | Startup from the United States | 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Zeplin yet.
CatchForm is a form backend for static websites. You change one attribute in your HTML — the form's action — and submissions start landing in an inbox. Each submission is stored, shown in a web inbox, emailed to an address you confirm, and optionally POSTed to a webhook. Field names are yours:...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
No features have been listed yet.
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Zeplin is best suited for designers and developers working in teams where clear design specifications and organized collaboration are critical. It's particularly beneficial for teams using Figma, Sketch, or Adobe XD who want to ensure precise design implementation and reduce misunderstandings between design and development departments.
No analysis of CatchForm.dev yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
No CatchForm.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Zeplin and CatchForm.dev.
CatchForm.dev's answer:
CatchForm is deliberately not a form builder. Your HTML defines the fields — whatever your form posts is what gets stored — so adding a field means editing your own markup, not reconfiguring anything here.
Two defaults are unusual. Notifications only go to an address you have confirmed by clicking a link sent to it, so an endpoint cannot be pointed at a stranger's mailbox. And redirects after submit are restricted to the host you set in your form's settings, so the endpoint cannot be used to bounce visitors to somewhere else.
Submissions are stored independently of email. If a notification bounces or lands in spam, the message is still in your inbox here.
CatchForm.dev's answer:
Because it is not tied to where your site is hosted. The same form works on Netlify, Vercel, Cloudflare Pages, GitHub Pages, S3 or your own server, and keeps working when you move between them.
The free plan is meant to be used on a real site rather than to expire: one form, 100 submissions a month, no card. Pro is $12/month or $120/year for 10 forms, 10,000 submissions a month, file uploads and webhooks.
It is built and supported by one developer. Support, billing and bug reports go to one address and are answered by the person who wrote the code — there is no ticket queue to navigate.
CatchForm.dev's answer:
Developers and small web studios building static sites — Astro, Hugo, Eleventy, Jekyll, or hand-written HTML — where there is no server to process a contact form and adding one is out of proportion to the need.
Typically a portfolio, a landing page, documentation, or a small business site with a contact or enquiry form. People who want the form to work, not a form product to learn.
CatchForm.dev's answer:
CatchForm grew out of a set of small tools built by one developer in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. The form backend was the one with demand that never goes away: every static site eventually needs a contact form, and every time it means either standing up a server for a single POST or pasting a mailto: link that quietly loses messages.
It launched publicly on catchform.dev in 2026. It stays deliberately small — one job, done properly, rather than a form builder that grows features until it needs a manual.
Share your experience with using Zeplin and CatchForm.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


As aforementioned, Zeplin suffers some inherent drawbacks that may dent designers’ hopes for faster, easy, and reliable UI design. To avert such scenarios, you don’t have to get stuck with Zeplin as there are numerous...
Zeplin is super affordable. It offers 2 plans: Team, which costs $8.00 per user per month, and Establishment, which costs $16.00 monthly. Zeplin also provides a feature-limited Free Plan and Enterprise Plan.
Zeplin is a workspace collaboration tool to document what to build and how designs should behave in a central collaborative place for the entire dev team.
We have no reviews of CatchForm.dev yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tools like Zeplin's AI layer, Supernova, and the emerging generation of Figma plugins with AI backends do this today. The output is not a PDF full of screenshots. It is structured data: exact values, token references, and context — the... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Zeplin.io AI-powered design-to-dev handoff. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Additionally, thank you to all our community launch partners across the frontend ecosystem for helping us bring Storybook 8 to the world! Thanks to Chromatic, Figma, ViteConf, Omlet, DivRiots, story.to.design, StackBlitz, UXpin, Nx, Mock... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Tracking CatchForm.dev since Sep 2026.
When comparing Zeplin and CatchForm.dev, you can also consider the following products.

Prototyping and collaboration for design teams
Compare Invision to Zeplin or CatchForm.dev:

Just send your form to our URL and we'll forward it to your email.
Compare Formspree.io to Zeplin or CatchForm.dev:

The most powerful way to plan, prototype and hand off to developers, all without code. Download a free trial and see why professionals choose Axure RP 9.
Compare Axure to Zeplin or CatchForm.dev:

Collect form submissions, filter spam, and automate workflows — with AI landing pages from Basin Sites.
Compare Basin to Zeplin or CatchForm.dev:

Balsamiq. Rapid, effective and fun wireframing software.
Compare Balsamiq to Zeplin or CatchForm.dev:

Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket
Compare Netlify to Zeplin or CatchForm.dev: