Software Alternatives & Startups

Zed VS Boxes.dev

Compare Zed VS Boxes.dev and see what are their differences

Zed

Zed is a high-performance, multiplayer code editor from the creators of Atom and Tree-sitter.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Boxes.dev

Close your laptop again: run Claude Code and Codex in the cloud

No screenshot yet
Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Zed seems to be a lot more popular than Boxes.dev. While we know about 98 links to Zed, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Boxes.dev.

social mentions
98 vs 2
Developer Tools popularity
93% vs 7%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 25

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Zed
Boxes.dev
Website zed.dev boxes.dev
Pricing
Open source
—
Company — Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2026
Listed in

About Zed and Boxes.dev

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Zed
Boxes.dev

No description of Zed yet.

Boxes.dev is a cloud development environment for building software with coding agents. It looks like the Codex or Claude desktop apps, but works a bit differently: Everything is in the cloud, so you can close your laptop and nothing stops. Pick up the same sessions from the iOS and Android apps,...

Read more about Boxes.dev

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Zed 5 features
Boxes.dev 5 features
  • Collaborative Editing
    Zed offers real-time collaborative editing features, allowing multiple developers to work on the same codebase simultaneously, enhancing team productivity and communication.
  • Minimalist Interface
    The interface is designed to be distraction-free and minimalist, which helps developers focus on coding without unnecessary clutter and distractions.
  • Speed and Performance
    Zed is built with performance in mind, offering fast loading times and a smooth user experience, making coding more efficient.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Zed is available on multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it accessible to a wide array of users regardless of their operating system.
  • Innovative Features
    Zed includes several innovative features such as advanced search and navigation capabilities, which can significantly enhance the coding experience.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Extensions
    Compared to more established editors like VS Code, Zed currently has a more limited library of extensions and plugins, which might restrict customization and functionality.
  • Learning Curve
    New users coming from other development environments may face a learning curve due to Zed's unique interface and features.
  • Early Development
    As a relatively new tool, Zed may still be in its early stages of development, with potential bugs and missing features that could affect stability and user experience.
  • Community Size
    The community and user base for Zed is still growing, which can mean less community support, tutorials, and shared resources compared to more mature editors.
  • Instant macOS Development Environments
    Boxes.dev allows developers to quickly spin up macOS virtual machines for development purposes, significantly reducing the time needed to set up clean development environments compared to manual configuration.
  • Native Apple Silicon Support
    Boxes.dev is built to run natively on Apple Silicon (M1/M2/M3/M4) Macs, leveraging the Apple Virtualization framework for near-native performance without the overhead of traditional emulation.
  • Easy to Use Interface
    The app provides a streamlined, user-friendly interface for creating and managing macOS virtual machines, making virtualization accessible even to developers who aren't familiar with complex VM tooling.
  • Pre-configured Environments
    Boxes.dev offers the ability to create environments with development tools pre-installed or easily configurable, saving developers significant setup time when they need fresh or isolated macOS instances.
  • Snapshot and Restore Capabilities
    Users can take snapshots of their virtual machines and restore them to previous states, which is invaluable for testing, CI/CD workflows, and safely experimenting with system configurations without risk.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Zed
Boxes.dev

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Zed is considered a good code editor by many developers.

Why this product is good

  • Zed offers a modern and efficient code editing experience with features such as real-time collaboration, a clean interface, and high performance. It is built to be fast and responsive, making it suitable for developers who value speed in their editing tools.

Recommended for

    Developers looking for a collaborative and fast code editor with a modern interface would benefit from using Zed. It is especially suited for teams that require real-time collaboration capabilities.

Overall verdict

  • Boxes.dev appears to be a solid developer-focused tool that streamlines workflows, though its overall value depends on your specific technical needs and team size.

Why this product is good

  • Developer-centric design that integrates smoothly into existing coding workflows
  • Aims to reduce setup and configuration overhead so teams can focus on building
  • Modern, clean interface that appeals to technical users
  • Potential for improved collaboration and faster project spin-up

Recommended for

  • Software developers and engineering teams looking to simplify their tooling
  • Startups needing to move quickly with minimal infrastructure setup
  • Technical users who value streamlined, code-first workflows
  • Small to mid-sized teams seeking better collaboration on development projects

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Zed 2 videos + Add
Boxes.dev 0 videos + Add

Zed “kills” VSCode

More videos

  • - Zed - The 'Visual Studio Code Killer' - Now on Linux!

No Boxes.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Zed
Boxes.dev
93% 93%
7% 7%
100% 100%
0% 0%
88% 88%
AI
12% 12%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Zed and Boxes.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Zed 98 mentions
Boxes.dev 2 mentions
  • Learning GPUI by Building My Own Text Editor
    GPUI caught my attention because it's the framework behind Zed, and I really like the idea of building native desktop interfaces with Rust. - Source: dev.to / 14 days ago
  • How Our Engineering Team Uses AI, Part II: Meat Proxies
    Zed keeps showing up as well, both for its agent integrations and as a fast, light editor for when a human needs to edit or clean up what the agent wrote. - Source: dev.to / 15 days ago
  • Matt Mullenweg reportedly returns as Automattic CEO 2 days after getting booted
    I use Zed (https://zed.dev) as my agent harness and either the $20 ChatGPT sub + Sol for personal/independent projects or an enterprise Claude account for sponsored/paid work. It's pretty simple, you could probably set up something like... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

View more

  • Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX
    Devin Automations is the most obvious one: solid UX, but can get very expensive to run. There are also a bunch of newer startups in this space. I'm building one myself, https://boxes.dev -- we're very early but building for this exact... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Mitchellh starts a new company: Superlogical
    These tools all assume you have machines to run the agents on. But for parallel agents I'm pretty convinced you want each agent on its own isolated devbox running your dev environment (not e.g. Worktrees on one box) - which isn't trivial... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

Alternatives to Zed and Boxes.dev

When comparing Zed and Boxes.dev, you can also consider the following products.