Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Xfce VS Arcan

Compare Xfce VS Arcan and see what are their differences

Xfce logo Xfce

Xfce is a lightweight desktop environment for UNIX-like operating systems. It aims to be fast and low on system resources, while still being visually appealing and user friendly.

Arcan logo Arcan

Game engine and multimedia framework and display server.
  • Xfce Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-04
  • Arcan Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-14

Xfce features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Xfce is known for its minimal resource usage, making it an excellent choice for older machines and systems with limited resources.
  • Fast Performance
    Due to its lightweight nature, Xfce provides fast and responsive performance, even on less powerful hardware.
  • Highly Customizable
    Xfce offers a high degree of customization, allowing users to tweak the desktop environment to fit their preferences.
  • Stable and Reliable
    Xfce has a reputation for being stable and reliable, reducing the likelihood of crashes and other issues.
  • Active Development
    The project benefits from an active community of developers and regular updates, which helps keep the desktop environment secure and up-to-date.
  • Good Balance
    Xfce strikes a good balance between functionality and simplicity, providing essential features without becoming bloatware.
  • Low Learning Curve
    Thanks to its intuitive interface, Xfce is relatively easy for new users to pick up and understand quickly.

Possible disadvantages of Xfce

  • Limited Eye Candy
    Compared to more modern desktop environments like GNOME or KDE Plasma, Xfce may appear less visually appealing due to fewer graphical effects.
  • Less Out-of-the-box Functionality
    While customizable, Xfce might require additional configuration and setup to provide some of the advanced functionalities available in other desktop environments.
  • Limited Applications
    Xfce does not come with as many pre-installed applications as some other desktop environments, potentially requiring users to spend additional time installing needed software.
  • Less Innovation
    Being conservative in its design, Xfce tends to be slower in adopting cutting-edge features or trends compared to other, more dynamic environments.
  • Fragmented Ecosystem
    Some may find the ecosystem fragmented because different distributions may package Xfce differently, leading to inconsistencies across different Linux distributions.

Arcan features and specs

  • Open Source
    Arcan is open-source, allowing developers to access, modify, and improve the source code according to their needs. This fosters a community-driven environment and enhances transparency.
  • Versatility
    Arcan is designed to handle a wide array of graphical and multimedia tasks, making it suitable for various applications beyond just a display server.
  • Security Focus
    The platform emphasizes security by design, providing mechanisms to isolate and protect components and users, which is crucial in multi-user or multi-tenant systems.
  • Performance
    Arcan is optimized for performance, aiming to deliver efficient rendering and resource utilization, which is beneficial for both desktop environments and embedded systems.

Possible disadvantages of Arcan

  • Complexity
    Due to its extensive feature set and adaptable nature, Arcan's framework may have a steep learning curve for new users or developers unfamiliar with its architecture.
  • Limited Adoption
    Compared to more established systems like X11 or Wayland, Arcan has a smaller user base, which can limit community support, third-party integrations, and documentation.
  • Compatibility Challenges
    As Arcan offers a unique approach to handling graphical tasks, it might face compatibility issues with software or systems not specifically designed to work with its environment.

Analysis of Xfce

Overall verdict

  • Xfce is considered a good desktop environment, especially for those who prioritize speed and efficiency over the latest visual effects. It successfully delivers a stable and traditional user experience while being highly customizable and lightweight.

Why this product is good

  • Xfce is a widely praised desktop environment for its lightweight and resource-efficient nature, making it an excellent choice for older hardware or systems with limited resources. It provides a clean, customizable, and user-friendly interface that balances simplicity and functionality. The modular design of Xfce allows users to choose only the components they need, further optimizing performance. Additionally, Xfce is known for its stability and reliability, contributing to its reputation as a solid choice for both novice and advanced users.

Recommended for

  • Users with older or less powerful computers
  • Individuals who value system performance and speed
  • People who prefer a simple and straightforward interface
  • Linux users looking for a reliable and stable desktop environment
  • Those who want a highly customizable desktop experience without sacrificing performance

Xfce videos

Fully functional? - Xfce 4.14 First Impressions

More videos:

  • Review - Debian 10 XFCE Review
  • Review - Xfce Desktop Overview

Arcan videos

A Quick Review of Arcan XL3000 Low Profile Floor Jack

More videos:

  • Review - Arcan 2 Ton Jack For The Lexus Gsf
  • Review - Arcan 3 Ton Aluminum Low Profile Jack Review On The Jeep Wrangler YJ

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Xfce and Arcan)
Linux
90 90%
10% 10
Operating Systems
90 90%
10% 10
Desktop Environments
92 92%
8% 8
Window Manager
82 82%
18% 18

User comments

Share your experience with using Xfce and Arcan. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Xfce and Arcan

Xfce Reviews

9 Best Linux Desktop Environments to Use in 2023
XFCE is compatible with a wide range of Linux distros. Xfce does not offer sophisticated modifications, yet it is the most performance-oriented desktop environment. Itโ€™s a compact desktop environment with a comprehensive user interface. XFCE can be installed on a variety of UNIX systems. It has been reported to compile on Ubuntu, NetBSD, Solaris, Cygwin, OpenBSD, and macOS...
Source: geekflare.com
The 8 Best Ubuntu Desktop Environments (22.04 Jammy Jellyfish Linux)
Cinnamon desktop is another fork of the GNOME desktop. It has a rather conservative design and is similar to Xfce. It is uncomplicated to learn and from this reason might be a good choice for someone who is new to Linux.
Source: linuxconfig.org
Top 10 Best Desktop Environments in 2020
Lightweight and Low-resource can be considered the same, but in this case, thereโ€™s a difference. XFCE is a lightweight desktop environment even with a whole lot of built-in customizations and UI perks. LXDE, on the other hand, is a DE that is built to be as low-resource as possible. You certainly can add animations, but they need to be downloaded separately.
The 12 Best Linux Desktop Environments
At first look, Xfce looks a bit older and boring, but we assure you that your mindset will change after unpacking it because it is one of the best Linux lightweight desktop environments available. Xfce is becoming one of the most reliable choices, but it has a comparatively small team for development that results in late updates. Nowadays, many users think that Xfce is an...
Source: linuxhint.com
The Best Desktop Environments For Linux (We Tested Them So That You Donโ€™t Have To)
Xfce is light on resources but proves to provide a feature-rich user experience. If you need a performance-centric desktop environment without needing advanced customizations, Xfce is a great choice to go with.
Source: itsfoss.com

Arcan Reviews

We have no reviews of Arcan yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Arcan might be a bit more popular than Xfce. We know about 21 links to it since March 2021 and only 19 links to Xfce. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Xfce mentions (19)

  • distro hopping
    Pick up your Desktop Environment based on your computer's specs, NOT on your visual preferences. (HINT: XFCE consumes way less system resources than GNOME and KDE). Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Lightweight dev tools.
    Itโ€™s a bit of an interesting challenge and has forced me to re-examine some of my tool usage. I started by a minimal install of Debian โ€œbookwormโ€ with the XFCE Desktop Environment which chews through much fewer resources than the default GNOME 43 based environment (although more than LXDE - but there still has to be room for aesthetics). - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • I Still Use Windows 95 (archived, 2008)
    Luckily you can get an efficient, clean Desktop Environment that works well and is actively developed: Xfce ( https://xfce.org/ ) I think you will like it. It has a very early-2000's feel IMO. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • best lightweight linux distro for old laptop and gaming
    Well, it depends. It was better experience than FreeBSD 7.2 that's for sure. :) It was running Xorg with https://i3wm.org, a web-server, XMPP-server, PostgreSQL, few bots and dovecot / postfix (e-mail server). It was doing fine routing internet for 2PCs and a WiFi router for 10 years until its HDD died. For gaming... erm... I was able to play something like Theme Hospital or Syndicate Wars in dosbox. You have to... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Only one of the four XFCE4's desktop/workspace got hung and now I can't use wallpaper
    Another resource for help might be xfce.org. It's a low traffic site, but responsive. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

Arcan mentions (21)

  • ร‰toilรฉ โ€“ desktop built on GNUStep
    Chisnall has stated several times over on Lobsters that he's thinking of basing is future project on Arcan (https://arcan-fe.com/). It's a very interesting project. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • In praise of grobi for auto-configuring X11 monitors
    Yes, multi-protocol display servers like Arcan are the future. https://arcan-fe.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Dear sir, you have built a compiler (2022)
    You should take a look at arcan, it's almost exactly that: http://arcan-fe.com - https://arcan-fe.com/2022/10/15/whipping-up-a-new-shell-lashcat9/ - https://arcan-fe.com/2024/09/16/a-spreadsheet-and-a-debugger-walks-into-a-shell/ I am not using it as a daily driver, because, emacs, but I keep an eye on it because, well, emacs. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Xpra: Persistent Remote Applications for X11
    This was very cool, and is made in Arcan! https://arcan-fe.com/ a project I just recently discovered and am very excited about. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Ideal OS: Rebooting the Desktop Operating System (2017)
    A lot of this seems like it's done by Arcan (https://arcan-fe.com). - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Xfce and Arcan, you can also consider the following products

LXQt - The LXQt team is proud to announce the release of qtermwidget and qterminal, both in version 0. 8. 0. Read more..

Wayfire - Wayland compositor with 3d effects.

KDE Plasma Desktop - Plasma Workspaces is the umbrella term for all graphical environments provided by KDE.

Unity8 - Mir compositor with Wayland apps support.

i3 - A dynamic tiling window manager designed for X11, inspired by wmii, and written in C.

UKUI - UKUI is a lightweight desktop environment based on pluggable framework for Linux and other Unix-like Distributions.