Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
x

xfce-panel VS i3status-rust

Compare xfce-panel VS i3status-rust and see what are their differences

Monitask
Employee Monitoring Software with Screenshots, Internet, Activity and Time Tracking featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

xfce-panel logo xfce-panel

Xfce componet to switch between opened windows, launch applications, switch workspaces and menu plugins to browse applications or directories.

i3status-rust logo i3status-rust

i3status-rs is a feature-rich and resource-friendly replacement for i3status, written in pure Rust. It provides a way to display "blocks" of system information (time, battery status, volume, etc) on bars that support the i3bar protocol.
  • xfce-panel Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-06-30
Not present

xfce-panel features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Xfce-panel is designed to be lightweight, making it an ideal choice for systems with limited resources or users looking for a fast and efficient desktop environment.
  • Highly Configurable
    Users can easily configure the xfce-panel to suit their needs by adding, removing, or rearranging applets and components.
  • Plugin Support
    Xfce-panel supports numerous plugins, allowing users to extend its functionality with additional features like weather updates, system monitoring, and more.
  • Stable and Reliable
    Xfce-panel is known for its stability and has a long history of reliable service, making it a dependable component for daily use.
  • Consistent User Experience
    The panel offers a consistent and intuitive user experience that aligns with the overall design philosophy of the XFCE desktop environment.

Possible disadvantages of xfce-panel

  • Limited Eye Candy
    Xfce-panel is designed with performance in mind, leading to a more simplistic visual appearance which may not appeal to users who prefer more visually rich environments.
  • Less Modern Look
    Compared to other desktop environments, the xfce-panel might appear somewhat dated, which may not be ideal for users seeking a modern aesthetic.
  • Fewer Advanced Features
    While it covers the basics well, xfce-panel might lack some of the advanced features found in panels from other desktop environments like GNOME or KDE.
  • Limited Development Speed
    The development pace of Xfce-panel can be slower compared to other popular desktop panels, which might delay the introduction of new features.

i3status-rust features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to xfce-panel and i3status-rust)

xfce-panel

i3status-rust

App Launcher
70 70%
App Launcher
30% 30
Productivity
70 70%
Productivity
30% 30
Note Taking
70 70%
Note Taking
30% 30
LMS
50 50%
LMS
50% 50

User comments

Share your experience with using xfce-panel and i3status-rust. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing xfce-panel and i3status-rust, you can also consider the following products

Yambar - Modular status panel for X11 and Wayland, inspired by polybar.

Waybar - Highly customizable Wayland bar for Sway and Wlroots based compositors. :v: :tada: - GitHub - Alexays/Waybar: Highly customizable Wayland bar for Sway and Wlroots based compositors.

ironbar - Customisable Wayland gtk bar written in Rust.

nwg-panel - Nwg-panel is a GTK3-based panel for sway and Hyprland Wayland compositors. The panel is equipped with a graphical configuration program that frees the user from the need to manually edit configuration files.

wf-shell - wf-shell is a repository which contains the various components needed to built a fully functional DE based around wayfire. Currently it has only a GTK-based panel and background client.

Quickshell - A Flexible toolkit for making desktop shells with QtQuick, targeting Wayland and X11.

Loading...