Software Alternatives & Startups

xeoma VS cppq

Compare xeoma VS cppq and see what are their differences

xeoma

AI-powered Xeoma supports 99% of cameras and runs on Windows, Linux/ARM (Raspberry Pi), macOS, iOS and Android. Trusted worldwide and available in 78 languages, with a free mode and demo licenses to try first.

Rating
5.0 · 1 review
Pricing
Freemium Free trial $15 / One-off (Lite, 1 camera, remote access, motion detection, endless footage)
cppq

Simple, reliable & efficient distributed task queue for C++

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, xeoma seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
2 vs 0
Security popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

xeoma
cppq
Website felenasoft.com github.com
Pricing
Freemium Free trial $15 / One-off (Lite, 1 camera, remote access, motion detection, endless footage) Official pricing
—
Platforms
Desktop Docker Windows Mac Linux ARM +3
—
Company 2004 —
Listed in —

About xeoma and cppq

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

xeoma
cppq

Xeoma - surveillance made powerful and easy Looking for video surveillance software that's as flexible as it is powerful? Xeoma has been actively developed and refined since 2004, giving you a mature, reliable platform you can trust to protect what matters. Works everywhere you do. Run Xeoma on...

Read more about xeoma

No description of cppq yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

xeoma 9 features
cppq 5 features
  • Remote access from anywhere on the globe
    View your cameras and control Xeoma remotely no matter where you are, even if you don't have static external IP address! Xeoma mobile and desktop apps allow you to connect to your cameras and watch them live or check footages anytime. Xeoma offers WOW-opportunity, the company's own development: 100% free P2P remote connection.
  • Administration and user profiles
    Rapid integration of as many as 3000 cameras per server, compatible with any camera resolution (10 megapixels and above), user-friendly management interface for restoring settings, compatibility with both LDAP and LDAPS protocols, capability for connecting to multiple servers, network clustering features, detailed customization of access rights, and the option to launch a personal cloud service, ensuring the system's reliable operation with minimal oversight.
  • AI-Powered Assistance
    Artificial intelligence modules in Xeoma: face recognition, license plate recognition, object and sound type recognition, speed detection, color recognition and many more.
  • Floorplans
    Multi-layered interactive map of a site (eMap), device list of cameras, image rotation, zoom in/out
  • Notifications & Alerts
    SMS and email notifications, PUSH-notifications and instant alerts with photos/video fragments of the even
  • Dual Functionality
    Dual streaming from cameras
  • Supported Devices
    1000+ supported camera models: ONVIF, MJPEG, H.264, H.264+, H.265, H.265+, H.266, Fisheye, WiFi, PTZ, audio, RPI module etc.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Works on all popular OSes: Windows, Linux, Linux/ARM (Raspberry), macOS, iOS and Android.
  • Interface
    Simple interface — easy setup and module combination. Assemble the required configuration in minutes, without studying complex manuals.
  • Lightweight C++ implementation
    cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
  • Redis-backed reliability
    Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
  • Inspired by proven design (asynq)
    The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
  • Native integration for C++ projects
    For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
  • Open source and inspectable
    Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited maturity and battle-testing
    Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
  • Smaller community and ecosystem
    Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
  • Documentation gaps
    As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
  • C++ build and dependency complexity
    Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
  • Fewer built-in features and tooling
    cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

xeoma
cppq

No analysis of xeoma yet.

Overall verdict

  • cppq is a lightweight, Redis-backed distributed task queue for C++ inspired by Go's popular 'asynq' library. It's a good choice for developers who need a simple, dependency-light job queue system in C++ without the overhead of larger enterprise messaging systems, though it's a smaller, less battle-tested project compared to mature alternatives.

Why this product is good

  • Simple and lightweight design makes it easy to understand and integrate into existing C++ projects
  • Built on Redis, a well-established and reliable backend for queue storage, giving it a solid foundation
  • Inspired by asynq (a proven Go library), so the design patterns and task queue semantics are based on a well-thought-out model
  • Open source on GitHub, allowing developers to inspect, modify, and contribute to the code
  • Good fit for projects already using Redis, minimizing the need for additional infrastructure
  • Straightforward API for enqueueing and processing background jobs in C++ applications

Recommended for

  • C++ developers needing a background job/task queue without adopting a heavyweight message broker
  • Projects already using Redis as part of their infrastructure
  • Small to medium-sized applications requiring asynchronous task processing
  • Teams comfortable working with less mainstream or smaller open-source libraries and willing to contribute or debug issues themselves
  • Developers familiar with asynq (Go) looking for a similar pattern in C++
  • Prototyping or hobby projects where a minimal task queue solution is sufficient

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

xeoma 3 videos + Add
cppq 0 videos + Add

Real-time event detection with Xeoma Security Manager

More videos

  • - Xeoma - your All-in-One Security Solution
  • - What is Xeoma and where to apply it?

No cppq videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
xeoma
cppq
100% 100%
0% 0%
100% 100%
0% 0%
100% 100%
0% 0%
100% 100%
0% 0%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing xeoma and cppq.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

xeoma's answer

1) Xeoma is a cross-platform video surveillance program, unlike many competitors. It can work on Windows, Linux, Linux/ARM(!), Mac OS X, Android.

2) In Xeoma, there is no increase in the cost of licenses depending on the type of cameras; replacing one camera with another without unnecessary hassles.

3) Xeoma has an intuitive interface. Easy to learn without the need for training webinars or hours of consultation.

4) The Xeoma motion detector allows you to select many detection zones of any shape and size.

5) Xeoma does not affect the settings of your cameras outside the program.

6) In Xeoma, it’s easy to work with sound from cameras, without unnecessary complications, untying and tying to cameras.

7) On FTP, Xeoma saves not only pictures, but also videos.

8) Xeoma has no restrictions on simultaneous viewing via the web server

9) Xeoma has no restrictions on simultaneous viewing through a mobile application

10) Xeoma has more reactions, launching applications is not only bat and exe.

11) Xeoma has the opportunity to create your own cloud service Xeoma Pro Your Cloud.

12) Xeoma allows you to completely customize both the server and clients, changing not only the name, but also the functionality and appearance of the program.

13) Xeoma has its own WOW-development for remote access to a server without static IP.

What's the story behind your product?

xeoma's answer

In active development since 2004, Xeoma has seen continuous improvements to both its core engine and feature set. That depth of experience lets us build solutions that power security and analytics operations for clients around the world, day in and day out.

User comments

Share your experience with using xeoma and cppq. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

xeoma 5.0 · 1 review
cppq no reviews yet

We have no reviews of cppq yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

xeoma 2 mentions
cppq 0 mentions
  • How do you handle security cameras?
    I use Reolink cameras over POE with a Xeoma docker running on Unraid. Agent DVR is also a great free alternative NVR. Source: almost 5 years ago
  • Ask HN: Security Camera That Doesn't Talk to 3rd Parties?
    - Blue Iris /r/HomeSecurity may also be helpful [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-dsZlSggdU [2] https://felenasoft.com/xeoma/en/ [3]... - Source: Hacker News / over 5 years ago

Tracking cppq since Nov 2022.

Alternatives to xeoma and cppq

When comparing xeoma and cppq, you can also consider the following products.